Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31440
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Reputation: A Bibliometric Analysis

Authors: Songdi Li, Louise Spry, Tony Woodall

Abstract:

Nowadays, Corporate Social responsibility (CSR) is becoming a buzz word, and more and more academics are putting efforts on CSR studies. It is believed that CSR could influence Corporate Reputation (CR), and they hold a favourable view that CSR leads to a positive CR. To be specific, the CSR related activities in the reputational context have been regarded as ways that associate to excellent financial performance, value creation, etc. Also, it is argued that CSR and CR are two sides of one coin; hence, to some extent, doing CSR is equal to establishing a good reputation. Still, there is no consensus of the CSR-CR relationship in the literature; thus, a systematic literature review is highly in need. This research conducts a systematic literature review with both bibliometric and content analysis. Data are selected from English language sources, and academic journal articles only, then, keyword combinations are applied to identify relevant sources. Data from Scopus and WoS are gathered for bibliometric analysis. Scopus search results were saved in RIS and CSV formats, and Web of Science (WoS) data were saved in TXT format and CSV formats in order to process data in the Bibexcel software for further analysis which later will be visualised by the software VOSviewer. Also, content analysis was applied to analyse the data clusters and the key articles. In terms of the topic of CSR-CR, this literature review with bibliometric analysis has made four achievements. First, this paper has developed a systematic study which quantitatively depicts the knowledge structure of CSR and CR by identifying terms closely related to CSR-CR (such as ‘corporate governance’) and clustering subtopics emerged in co-citation analysis. Second, content analysis is performed to acquire insight on the findings of bibliometric analysis in the discussion section. And it highlights some insightful implications for the future research agenda, for example, a psychological link between CSR-CR is identified from the result; also, emerging economies and qualitative research methods are new elements emerged in the CSR-CR big picture. Third, a multidisciplinary perspective presents through the whole bibliometric analysis mapping and co-word and co-citation analysis; hence, this work builds a structure of interdisciplinary perspective which potentially leads to an integrated conceptual framework in the future. Finally, Scopus and WoS are compared and contrasted in this paper; as a result, Scopus which has more depth and comprehensive data is suggested as a tool for future bibliometric analysis studies. Overall, this paper has fulfilled its initial purposes and contributed to the literature. To the author’s best knowledge, this paper conducted the first literature review of CSR-CR researches that applied both bibliometric analysis and content analysis; therefore, this paper achieves its methodological originality. And this dual approach brings advantages of carrying out a comprehensive and semantic exploration in the area of CSR-CR in a scientific and realistic method. Admittedly, its work might exist subjective bias in terms of search terms selection and paper selection; hence triangulation could reduce the subjective bias to some degree.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility, corporate reputation, bibliometric analysis, software data analysis.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 406

References:


[1] Baldarelli, M. and Gigli, S., 2014. Exploring the drivers of corporate reputation integrated with a corporate responsibility perspective: some reflections in theory and in praxis. Journal of Management & Governance, 18 (2), 589-613.
[2] Balica, M. and Lonescu, S., 2018. Perception of the Organizations Reputation. FAIMA Business & Management Journal, 6(4), pp.42-54.
[3] Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A., 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6), 1173.
[4] Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R. and Lefebvre, E., 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, 2008(10), p.P10008.
[5] Brammer, S.J. and Pavelin, S., 2004. Building a good reputation. European Management Journal, 22(6), pp.704-713.
[6] Brammer, S.J. and Pavelin, S., 2006. Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of management studies, 43(3), pp.435-455.
[7] Brin, S. and Page, L., 1998. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30 (1-7), 107-117.
[8] Brown, T.J. and Dacin, P.A., 1997. The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. The Journal of Marketing,, 68-84.
[9] Carroll, A.B., 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4 (4), 497-505.
[10] De Quevedo-Puente, E., De La Fuente-Sabaté, Juan Manuel and Delgado-García, J.B., 2007. Corporate social performance and corporate reputation: Two interwoven perspectives. Corporate Reputation Review, 10 (1), 60-72.
[11] Dowling, G.R. and Otubsnjo, T., 2011. Corporate and organizational identity: Two sides of the same coin. AMS review, 1(3-4), pp.171-182.
[12] Feng, Y., Zhu, Q. and Lai, K.H., 2017. Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 158, pp.296-307.
[13] Fernando, S. and Lawrence, S., 2014. A theoretical framework for CSR practices: integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), pp.149-178.
[14] Fombrun, C.J. and Van Riel, C.B., 1997. The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 1 (2), 5-13.
[15] Fombrun, C.J., Gardberg, N.A. and BARNETT, M.L., 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105 (1), 85-106.
[16] Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, , 39-50.
[17] Garcia-Castro, R., Ariño, M.A. and Canela, M.A., 2010. Does social performance really lead to financial performance? Accounting for endogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 92 (1), 107-126.
[18] Gatzert, N., 2015. The impact of corporate reputation and reputation damaging events on financial performance: Empirical evidence from the literature. European Management Journal, 33 (6), 485-499.
[19] Goodpaster, K.E., 1991. Business ethics and stakeholder analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 53-73.
[20] Hillenbrand, C. and Money, K., 2007. Corporate responsibility and corporate reputation: Two separate concepts or two sides of the same coin? Corporate Reputation Review, 10 (4), 261-277.
[21] Hillman, A.J. and Keim, G.D., 2001. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? Strategic management journal, 22(2), pp.125-139.
[22] Hitlin, S., 2003. Values as the core of personal identity: Drawing links between two theories of self. Social psychology quarterly, 66(2), p.118.
[23] Hjørland, B., 2013. Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing & Management, 49 (6), 1313-1325.
[24] Hoejmose, S.U., Roehrich, J.K. and Grosvold, J., 2014. Is doing more doing better? The relationship between responsible supply chain management and corporate reputation. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(1), pp.77-90.
[25] Joyner, B.E., Payne, D. and Raiborn, C.A., 2002. Building values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility into the developing organization. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7 (1), 113.
[26] Lin-Hi, N. and Blumberg, I., 2018. The link between (not) practicing CSR and corporate reputation: Psychological foundations and managerial implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 150 (1), 185-198.
[27] Lindgreen, A. and Swaen, V., 2005. Corporate citizenship: Let not relationship marketing escape the management toolbox. Corporate Reputation Review, 7 (4), 346-363.
[28] Mahon, J.F. and Wartick, S.L., 2003. Dealing with stakeholders: How reputation, credibility and framing influence the game. Corporate Reputation Review, 6 (1), 19-35.
[29] Mcwilliams, A. and Siegel, D., 2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21 (5), 603-609.
[30] Melewar, T.C. and Tucker, L., 2005. Corporate reputation and crisis management: The threat and manageability of anti-corporatism.
[31] Orlitzky, M. and Benjamin, J.D., 2001. Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review. Business & Society, 40 (4), 369-396.
[32] Persson, O., Danell, R. and Schneider, J.W., 2009. How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at His 60th Birthday, 5, 9-24.
[33] Podsakoff, P.M., Mackenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y. and Podsakoff, N.P., 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879.
[34] Radicchi, F., Castellano, C., Cecconi, F., Loreto, V. and Parisi, D., 2004. Defining and identifying communities in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(9), pp.2658-2663.
[35] Raiborn, C.A. and Payne, D., 1990. Corporate codes of conduct: A collective conscience and continuum. Journal of Business Ethics, 9 (11), 879-889.
[36] Rossouw, G.J., 2005. Business ethics and corporate governance in Africa. Business & Society, 44 (1), 94-106.
[37] Scott, S.G. and Lane, V.R., 2000. A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management review, 25(1), pp.43-62.
[38] Sen, S. and Bhattacharya, C.B., 2001. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2), 225-243.
[39] Siltaoja, M.E., 2006. Value priorities as combining core factors between CSR and reputation–a qualitative study. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), pp.91-111.
[40] Sinkovics, N., 2016. Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review, 33(3), pp.327-350.
[41] Stuart, H., 1999. Towards a definitive model of the corporate identity management process. Corporate communications: an international journal, 4(4), pp.200-207.
[42] Velasquez, M., Andre, C., Shanks, T. and Meyer, M.J., 1996. Thinking ethically: A framework for moral decision making. Issues in Ethics, 7(1).
[43] Vidaver-Cohen, D. and BRØNN, P.S., 2015. Reputation, responsibility, and stakeholder support in Scandinavian firms: A comparative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 127 (1), 49-64.
[44] Vidaver-Cohen, D., 2007. Reputation beyond the rankings: A conceptual framework for business school research. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), pp.278-304.
[45] Waltman, L. and Van Eck, N.J., 2013. A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. The European Physical Journal B, 86 (11), 471.
[46] Wartick, S.L., 2002. Measuring corporate reputation: Definition and data. Business & Society, 41(4), pp.371-392.