The Mechanism Underlying Empathy-Related Helping Behavior: An Investigation of Empathy-Attitude- Action Model
Empathy has been an important issue in psychology, education, as well as cognitive neuroscience. Empathy has two major components: cognitive and emotional. Cognitive component refers to the ability to understand others’ perspectives, thoughts, and actions, whereas emotional component refers to understand how others feel. Empathy can be induced, attitude can then be changed, and with enough attitude change, helping behavior can occur. This finding leads us to two questions: is attitude change really necessary for prosocial behavior? And, what roles cognitive and affective empathy play? For the second question, participants with different psychopathic personality (PP) traits are critical because high PP people were found to suffer only affective empathy deficit. Their cognitive empathy shows no significant difference from the control group. 132 college students voluntarily participated in the current three-stage study. Stage 1 was to collect basic information including Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised (PPI-R), Attitude Scale, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and demographic data. Stage two was for empathy induction with three controversial scenarios, namely domestic violence, depression with a suicide attempt, and an ex-offender. Participants read all three stories and then rewrite the stories by one of two perspectives (empathetic vs. objective). They would then complete the VAS and Attitude Scale one more time for their post-attitude and emotional status. Three IVs were introduced for data analysis: PP (High vs. Low), Responsibility (whether or not the character is responsible for what happened), and Perspective-taking (Empathic vs. Objective). Stage 3 was for the action. Participants were instructed to freely use the 17 tokens they received as donations. They were debriefed and interviewed at the end of the experiment. The major findings were people with higher empathy tend to take more action in helping. Attitude change is not necessary for prosocial behavior. The controversy of the scenarios and how familiar participants are towards target groups play very important roles. Finally, people with high PP tend to show more public prosocial behavior due to their affective empathy deficit. Pre-existing value and belief as well as recent dramatic social events seem to have a big impact and possibly reduce the effect of the independent variables (IV) in our paradigm.Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 594
 Ajzen I. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In Kuhl J., & Beckmann J. (Eds.) Action Control. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer. 1985. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2.
 Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous, X., & Warden, D. Cognitive and affective perspective-taking in conduct-disordered children high and low on callous-unemotional traits. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2(1), 16. 2008. doi:10.1186/1753-2000-2-16.
 Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group Motivate One to Help the Group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656-1666. 2002. doi:10.1177/014616702237647.
 Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L. Bednar, Klein, T. R., & Highberger, L. Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 105-118. 1997. doi:10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.168.
 Berk, L. E. Child Development (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson. 2009.
 Carlo, G., Eisenberg, N., & Knight, G. P. An objective measure of adolescents' prosocial moral reasoning. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2(4), 331-349. 1992.
 Carlo, G., & Randall, B. A. The development of a measure of prosocial behaviors for late adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(1), 31-44. 2002
 Chang, J.-H., Huang, C.-L., & Lin, Y.-C. Psychological displacement writing paradigm: Characteristics and beneficial effects. Chinese Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 28, 29-60. doi:10.7082/CJGC.201009.0029. 2010.
 Cleckley, H. M. The Mask of sanity. Postgraduate Medicine, 9(3), 193-197. 1951.
 Davis, M. H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126. 1983.
 De Vignemont, F., & Singer, T. The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 435-441. 2006.
 Dymond, R. F. A scale for the measurement of empathic ability. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13(2), 127-133. 1949.
 Eisenberg-Berg, N., Cameron, E., Tryon, K., & Dodez, R. Socialization of prosocial behavior in the preschool classroom. Developmental Psychology, 17(6), 773-782. 1981
 Eisenberg, N., Eggum, N. D., & Di Giunta, L. Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4(1), 143-180. 2010.
 Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., Kupanoff, K., & Laible, D. Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. The Journal of EarlyAdolescence, 19(1), 5-16. 1999.
 Feshbach, N. D. Studies of empathic behavior in children. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 8, 1-47. 1978.
 Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: a person x situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 583-599. 2007. doi:10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1243
 Hare, R. D. Manual for the Revised Psychopathy Checklist (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems. 2003
 Hare, R. D. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-revised. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems. 1991.
 Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. Emotional contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(3), 96-100. 1993.
 Hatfield, E., Rapson, R. L., & Le, Y.-C. L. Emotional contagion and empathy. In Decety, J., & Ickes W. (Eds.) Social Neuroscience. The Social Neuroscience of Empathy. MIT Press. 2009. doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.001.0001.
 Jin S.-R. Review and prospect of psychological displacement writing paradigm: Pronouns characteristics and its beneficial effects. Chinese Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 53, 117-149. 2018. doi:10.3966/172851862018100053005.
 Mayer, S. V., Jusyte, A., Klimecki-Lenz, O. M., & Schönenberg, M. Empathy and altruistic behavior in antisocial violent offenders with psychopathic traits. Psychiatry Research, 269, 625-632. 2018.
 McGinley, M., & Carlo, G. Two sides of the same coin? The relations between prosocial and physically aggressive behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(3), 337. 2007.
 McIlwain, D. Bypassing empathy: A Machiavellian theory of mind and sneaky power. In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (Eds.), Macquarie Monographs in Cognitive Science. Individual Differences in Theory of Mind: Implications for Typical and Atypical Development (p. 39–66). Psychology Press. 2003.
 Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525-543. 1972.
 Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938. 2009.
 Schroeder, D. A., Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., & Piliavin, J. A. The Psychology of Helping and Altruism: Problems and Puzzles. McGraw-Hill. 1995.
 Skeem, J. L., Polaschek, D. L. L., Patrick, C. J., & Lilienfeld, S. O. Psychopathic personality: Bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(3), 95-162. 2011. doi:10.1177/1529100611426706
 Stotland, E. Exploratory investigations of empathy. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 271-314. 1969. doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60080-5.
 Wai, M., & Tiliopoulos, N. The affective and cognitive empathic nature of the dark triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(7), 794-799. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.008
 White, B. A. Who cares when nobody is watching? Psychopathic traits and empathy in prosocial behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 116-121. 2014.