Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32722
Exploring the Potential of Chatbots in Higher Education: A Preliminary Study

Authors: S. Studente, S. Ellis, S. F. Garivaldis


We report upon a study introducing a chatbot to develop learning communities at a London University, with a largely international student base. The focus of the chatbot was twofold; to ease the transition for students into their first year of university study, and to increase study engagement. Four learning communities were created using the chatbot; level 3 foundation, level 4 undergraduate, level 6 undergraduate and level 7 post-graduate. Students and programme leaders were provided with access to the chat bot via mobile app prior to their study induction and throughout the autumn term of 2019. At the end of the term, data were collected via questionnaires and focus groups with students and teaching staff to allow for identification of benefits and challenges. Findings indicated a positive correlation between study engagement and engagement with peers. Students reported that the chatbot enabled them to obtain support and connect to their programme leader. Both staff and students also made recommendation on how engagement could be further enhanced using the bot in terms of; clearly specified purpose, integration with existing university systems, leading by example and connectivity. Extending upon these recommendations, a second pilot study is planned for September 2020, for which the focus will be upon improving attendance rates, student satisfaction and module pass rates.

Keywords: Chatbot, e-learning, learning communities, student engagement.

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1492


[1] S. Ellis, Improving Student Engagement via a Chatbot. Retrieved from: 2019.
[2] M. Peel, “‘Nobody cares’: the challenge of isolation in school to university transition”. Journal of Institutional Research, pp 22 - 34. 2000
[3] K. Hone, & G. El Said, “Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study”. Computers & Education. 98, pp 157 – 168. 2016
[4] A. Arnold, How Chatbots Feed into Millennials' Need for Instant Gratification. Retrieved from: 2018
[5] S. Chaudhuri, R. Kumar, M. Joshi, E. Terrell, F. Higgs, F. V. & Allen, “It’s not easy being green: Supporting collaborative green design learning”. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp 807 – 809. 2008
[6] E. Erichsen, & D. Bolliger, “Towards understanding international graduate student isolation in traditional and online environments”. Educational Technology Research and Development. 59, pp 309 – 326. 2011
[7] J. McClure, “International graduates’ cross-cultural adjustment: Experiences, coping strategies, and suggested programmatic responses”. Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 12, no. 2, pp 199 – 217. 2007
[8] A. Reynolds, & M. Constantine, (2007). “Cultural adjustment difficulties and career development of international college students”. Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 15, No. 3, pp 338 – 350. 2007.
[9] K. Cross, “Why learning communities? Why now?” About Campus. Vol. 3, No. 3, pp 4 – 11. 1998
[10] C. Crawford, & R. Cook, “Creating and Sustaining Communities of Learning within Distance Learning Environments: Focusing upon Making Connections, Creating Communities of Learning, and Responsibilities”. International Journal of Learning. Vol. 15, No. 2, pp 179 - 193. 2008
[11] S. Tegos, D. Stavros, & A. Karakostas, “Promoting academically productive talk with conversational agent interventions in collaborative learning settings”. Computers and Education. 87, pp 309 – 325. 2015.
[12] V. Fernoga, G. Stelea, C. Gavrila, & F. Sandu, “Intelligent Education Assistant Powered by Chatbots”. Proceedings of the 14th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education. 2018.
[13] J. Pereira, “Leveraging chatbots to improve self-guided learning through conversational quizzes”. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp 911 – 918. 2016
[14] L. Fryer, & R. Carpenter, “Bots as Language Learning Tools”. Language Learning & Technology, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp 8 – 14. 2006.
[15] D. Song, E. Young Oh, & M. Rice, “Interacting with a conversational agent system for educational purposes in online courses”. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human System Interactions. 2017.
[16] P. Bii, “Chatbot technology: A possible means of unlocking student potential to learn how to learn”. Educational Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, Pp 218 - 22. 2013.
[17] S. Kowalski, R. Hoffman, R. Jain & M. Mumtaz, “Using Conversational Agents to Help Teach Information Security Risk Analysis”. Proceedings of The First International Conference on Social Eco-Informatics. 2011
[18] A. Gulz, (2004). Benefits of Virtual Characters in Computer Based Learning Environments: Claims and Evidence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Vol. 14, 3, pp 313 – 334.
[19] S. Goggins, & W. Xing (2016). Building models explaining student participation behavior in asynchronous online discussion. Computers & Education, 94, 241 - 251.
[20] M. Alencar, & J. Netto, (2011). Developing a 3D Conversation Agent Talking About Online Courses. Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 1713 - 1719.
[21] S. Desaulniers, (2016). Chatbots rise, and the future may be 're-written'. Retrieved from future- may-be-re-written.html.
[22] M. Gill, (2019). 5 Ways Artificial Intelligence and Chatbots Are Changing Education. Retrieved from
[23] Differ (2019). Help Your Students Succeed. Retrieved from