Implementing Education 4.0 Trends in Language Learning

Authors: Luz Janeth Ospina M.

Abstract:

The fourth industrial revolution is changing the role of education substantially and, therefore, the role of instructors and learners at all levels. Education 4.0 is an imminent response to the needs of a globalized world where humans and technology are being aligned to enable endless possibilities, among them the need for students, as digital natives, to communicate effectively in at least one language besides their mother tongue, and also the requirement of developing theirs. This is an exploratory study in which a control group (N = 21), all of the students of Spanish as a foreign language at the university level, after taking a Spanish class, responded to an online questionnaire about the engagement, atmosphere, and environment in which their course was delivered. These aspects considered in the survey were relative to the instructor’s teaching style, including: (a) active, hands-on learning; (b) flexibility for in-class activities, easily switching between small group work, individual work, and whole-class discussion; and (c) integrating technology into the classroom. Strongly believing in these principles, the instructor deliberately taught the course in a SCALE-UP room, as it could facilitate such a positive and encouraging learning environment. These aspects are trends related to Education 4.0 and have become integral to the instructor’s pedagogical stance that calls for a constructive-affective role, instead of a transmissive one. As expected, with a learning environment that (a) fosters student engagement and (b) improves student outcomes, the subjects were highly engaged, which was partially due to the learning environment. An overwhelming majority (all but one) of students agreed or strongly agreed that the atmosphere and the environment were ideal. Outcomes of this study are relevant and indicate that it is about time for teachers to build up a meaningful correlation between humans and technology. We should see the trends of Education 4.0 not as a threat but as practices that should be in the hands of critical and creative instructors whose pedagogical stance responds to the needs of the learners in the 21st century.

Keywords: Active learning, education 4.0, higher education, pedagogical stance.

References:

[1] Penprase, B. E. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and Higher Education. In N. W. Gleason (Ed.), Higher Education in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (pp. 207–229). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
[2] Poggi, I., D’Errico, F., & Leone, G. (2012, May). Pedagogical Stance and its Multimodal Expression. Paper presented at the International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.
[3] Aziz Hussin, A. (2018). Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas for Teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92–98. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92
[4] Fisk, P. (2017). Education 4.0 … the future of learning will be dramatically different, in school and throughout life. Retrieved from http://www.thegeniusworks.com/2017/01/future-education-young-everyone-taught-together
[5] Ospina Montoya, L. J. & Holec, V. (2015–2016). Fostering 21st Century Skills by Matching Pedagogy and Learning Environment. A Light on Teaching, pp. 2
[–30.
[6] Benson, L. C., Orr, M. K., Biggers, S. B. Moss, W. F., Ohland, M. W. & Schiff, S. D. (2010). Student-centered active, cooperative learning in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(5), 1097–1110.
[7] Beichner, R. J. & Saul, J. M. (2003). Introduction to the SCALE‐UP (Student Centered Activities for Large Enrolment Undergraduate Programs) project. Paper presented at Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi, Varenna, Italy.
[8] Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Allain, R. J., Deardorff, D. L., & Abbott, D. S. (2000). Introduction to SCALE-UP: Student-centered activities for large enrolment university physics. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, Seattle, WA, Session 2380.
[9] Kregenow, J., Rogers, M., & Price, M. (2011). Is There a "Back" of the Room When the Teacher Is in the Middle? Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(6), 45–51. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42992897
[10] Lasry, N., Charles, E., Whittaker, C., Dedic, H., & Rosenfield, S. (2013). Changing classroom designs: Easy; Changing instructors’ pedagogies: Not so easy... AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513, 238–241.