Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 31108
Digital Transformation as the Subject of the Knowledge Model of the Discursive Space

Authors: Rafal Maciag

Abstract:

Due to the development of the current civilization, one must create suitable models of its pervasive massive phenomena. Such a phenomenon is the digital transformation, which has a substantial number of disciplined, methodical interpretations forming the diversified reflection. This reflection could be understood pragmatically as the current temporal, a local differential state of knowledge. The model of the discursive space is proposed as a model for the analysis and description of this knowledge. Discursive space is understood as an autonomous multidimensional space where separate discourses traverse specific trajectories of what can be presented in multidimensional parallel coordinate system. Discursive space built on the world of facts preserves the complex character of that world. Digital transformation as a discursive space has a relativistic character that means that at the same time, it is created by the dynamic discourses and these discourses are molded by the shape of this space.

Keywords: Knowledge, Complexity, discourse, Digital transformation, discursive space

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 178

References:


[1] A. Kukla, Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge, 2000.
[2] K. Knorr-Cetina, The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Elsevier Science Limited, 1981.
[3] B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1979.
[4] P. L. Berger and T. Luckmann, The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday, 1966.
[5] J.-F. Lyotard, La condition postmoderne. Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Éd. de minuit, 1979.
[6] J.-F. Lyotard, The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Manchester: Univ. Pr., 1989.
[7] M. Foucault, L’ordre du discours: leçon inaugurale au Collège de France prononcée le 2 décembre 1970. Paris: Gallimard, 1971.
[8] J. Angermüller, D. Maingueneau, and R. Wodak, The discourse studies reader: main currents in theory and analysis. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014.
[9] L. Crane, Knowledge and Discourse Matters: Relocating Knowledge Management’s Sphere of Interest onto Language. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2015.
[10] T. A. van Dijk, Discourse Studies. a Multidisciplinary Introduction: Discourse as Structure and Process Volume 1 Volume 1. London: SAGE, 1997.
[11] T. A. van Dijk, “Discourse and Knowledge,” in The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis, London: Routledge, 2013, pp. 587–603.
[12] K. Hyland and B. Paltridge, Eds., Bloomsbury companion to discourse analysis. London; New York: Bloomsbury, 2011.
[13] M. Jørgensen and L. Phillips, Discourse analysis as theory and method. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications, 2002.
[14] R. Maciag, “The Analysis of the Internet Development Based on the Complex Model of the Discursive Space,” Information, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 7, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/info9010007.
[15] D. D. Nolte, “The tangled tale of phase space,” Physics Today Physics Today, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 33–38, 2010.
[16] D. D. Nolte, Introduction to Modern Dynamics: Chaos, Networks, Space and Time, 1 edition. Oxford : New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2015.
[17] D. S. Byrne and G. Callaghan, Complexity theory and the social sciences: the state of the art. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
[18] M. Burgin, Theory of Knowledge: Structures and Processes, vol. 5. Singapore: World Scientifc Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2015.
[19] R. Maciag, “Discursive Space and Its Consequences for Understanding Knowledge and Information,” Philosophies, vol. 3, no. 4, 2018, doi: 10.3390/philosophies3040034.
[20] L. L. Gilson and C. B. Goldberg, “Editors’ Comment: So, What Is a Conceptual Paper?,” Group & Organization Management, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 127–130, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1177/1059601115576425.
[21] K. Popper, Logik der Forschung: Zur Erkenntnistheorie der Modernen Naturwissenschaft. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 1935.
[22] D. Hilbert, Grundlagen der Geometrie. Leipzig: Verlag von B.G. Teubner, 1899.
[23] G. Peano, Arithmetices principia: nova methodo. Romae, Florentiae: Fratres Bocca, 1889.
[24] M. Foucault, “The Order of Discourse,” in Untying the text: a post-structuralist reader, R. Young, Ed. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981, pp. 51–78.
[25] R. Maciag, “The Analysis of the Internet Development Based on the Complex Model of the Discursive Space,” Proceedings. Presented at the IS4SI 2017 Summit DIGITALISATION FOR A SUSTAINABLE SOCIETY, Gothenburg, Sweden, 12–16 June 2017, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 55, 2017.
[26] J. H. Holland, Complexity: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[27] M. Mitchell, Complexity: A Guided Tour, 1 edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
[28] R. Preiser and P. Cilliers, Complexity, difference and identity: an ethical perspective. New York: Springer, 2010.
[29] H. Sayama, Introduction to the Modeling and Analysis of Complex Systems, Print edition. Geneseo (N.Y.): Open SUNY Textbooks, 2015.
[30] D. M. Armstrong, A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
[31] L. Wittgenstein, Tractatus logico-philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., 1922.
[32] T.-P. Cheng, Relativity, Gravitation and Cosmology: A Basic Introduction. Oxford, UK: OUP Oxford, 2005.
[33] A. Bharadwaj, O. A. El Sawy, P. A. Pavlou, and N. V. Venkatraman, “Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights,” MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS QUARTERLY, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 471–482, 2013.
[34] G. Bongiorno, D. Rizzo, and G. Vaia, Eds., CIOs and the Digital Transformation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018.
[35] A. Bounfour, Digital Futures, Digital Transformation: From Lean Production to Acceluction. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
[36] C. Matt, T. Hess, and A. Benlian, “Digital Transformation Strategies,” Bus Inf Syst Eng, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 339–343, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5.
[37] D. R. A. Schallmo and C. A. Williams, Digital Transformation Now! Guiding the Successful Digitalization of Your Business Model. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018.
[38] E. Schreckling and C. Steiger, “Digitalize or Drown,” in Shaping the Digital Enterprise: Trends and Use Cases in Digital Innovation and Transformation, G. Oswald and M. Kleinemeier, Eds. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 3–27.
[39] F. Abolhassan, Ed., The Drivers of Digital Transformation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017.
[40] J.-L. Leignel, T. Ungaro, and A. Staar, Digital transformation information systems governance. London; Hoboken, NJ: ISTE, Ltd. ; Wiley, 2016.
[41] A. Maedche, J. vom Brocke, and A. Hevner, Eds., Designing the Digital Transformation: 12th international conference. S.l.: SPRINGER, 2017.
[42] A. Ustundag and E. Cevikcan, Eds., Industry 4.0: Managing The Digital Transformation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018.
[43] D. A. Alexandrov, A. V. Boukhanovsky, A. V. Chugunov, Y. Kabanov, and O. Koltsova, Eds., Digital Transformation and Global Society: Second International Conference, DTGS 2017, St. Petersburg, Russia, June 21–23, 2017, Revised Selected Papers, vol. 745. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017.
[44] M. Hobbs, S. Owen, and L. Gerber, “Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy,” Journal of Sociology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 271–284, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1440783316662718.
[45] A. Karatzogianni, D. Nguyen, and E. Serafinelli, Eds., The Digital Transformation of the Public Sphere: Conflict, Migration, Crisis and Culture in Digital Networks. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016.
[46] W. Leodolter, Digital Transformation Shaping the Subconscious Minds of Organizations. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017.
[47] P. Nagy and B. Koles, “The digital transformation of human identity: Towards a conceptual model of virtual identity in virtual worlds,” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 276–292, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1177/1354856514531532.
[48] M. Romberg, “Digitally Mature? Ready for the Digital Transformation?,” in Digital Marketplaces Unleashed, C. Linnhoff-Popien, R. Schneider, and M. Zaddach, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2018, pp. 57–64.
[49] E. Stolterman and A. C. Fors, “Information Technology and the Good Life,” in Information Systems Research: Relevant Theory and Informed Practice, B. Kaplan, D. P. Truex, D. Wastell, A. T. Wood-Harper, and J. I. DeGross, Eds. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2004, pp. 687–692.
[50] B. Castellani and F. W. Hafferty, Sociology and Complexity Science: A New Field of Inquiry, Softcover reprint of hardcover 1st ed. 2009 edition. Berlin: Springer, 2010.
[51] J. Urry, “The Complexity Turn,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1–14, 2005.
[52] P. Gärdenfors, Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2000.
[53] P. Gärdenfors, “Conceptual spaces as a framework for knowledge representation,” Mind and Matter, vol. 2, pp. 9–27, 2004.
[54] F. Zenker and P. Gärdenfors, Eds., Applications of Conceptual Spaces. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015.
[55] R. Abraham, J. E. Marsden, T. Ratiu, and R. Cushman, Foundations of Mechanics: 2nd Edition, 2nd edition. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1980.
[56] A. Inselberg and B. Shneiderman, Parallel coordinates visual multidimensional geometry and its applications ; with 230 color illustrations. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009.
[57] R. Torretti, Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincaré. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1978.
[58] D. W. Smith, “Mathematical Form in the World,” Philosophia Mathematica, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 102–129, Jun. 2002, doi: 10.1093/philmat/10.2.102.
[59] K. A. Appiah, Thinking It Through: An Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[60] D. Davidson, “The Folly of Trying to Define Truth,” in The Nature of Truth Classic and Contemporary Perspectives, M. P. Lynch, Ed. Cambridge, Mass., London, England: A Bradford Book. The MIT Press, 2001, pp. 623–640.
[61] E. Husserl, Introduction to Logic and Theory of Knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2008.
[62] B. Russell, Human Knowledge - Its Scope And Limits. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1923.
[63] A. Bird, “The Historical Turn in The Philosophy of Science,” in The Routledge companion to philosophy of science, S. Psillos and M. Curd, Eds. London etc.: Routledge, 2008, pp. 67–77.
[64] D. Bloor, Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976.
[65] L. Fleck, Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv ... Basel: Benno Schwabe, 1935.
[66] K. Mannheim, Ideologie und Utopie, vol. 3. Bonn: F. Cohen, 1929.
[67] M. Foucault, Les mots et les choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard, 1966.
[68] M. Foucault, L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard, 1969.
[69] D. Bell, The coming of post-industrial society: a venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
[70] M. Castells, The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Vol 1: The Rise of network society. Vol. 2: The Power of identity. Vol. 3: End of the millennium. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
[71] P. F. Drucker, Post - capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993.
[72] F. Machlup, The production and distribution of knowledge in the united states. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1962.
[73] I. Nonaka, The knowledge-creating company. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1991.
[74] I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The knowledge-creating company how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
[75] K. M. Wiig, Knowledge management. Arlington, Tex: Schema Press, 1993.
[76] M. Bramer, Principles of Data Mining, 3rd ed. London: Springer-Verlag, 2016.
[77] R. Kitchin, “Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts,” Big Data & Society, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 2053951714528481, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1177/2053951714528481.
[78] R. Brachman and H. Levesque, Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 1 edition. Amsterdam ; Boston: Morgan Kaufmann, 2004.
[79] F. Van Harmelen, V. Lifschitz, and B. Porter, Eds., Handbook of knowledge representation. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier, 2008.
[80] B. Paltridge, Discourse analysis: an introduction. London; New York: Continuum, 2006.
[81] D. Jurafsky and J. H. Martin, Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Prentice Hall, 2009.
[82] G. Boole, An investigation of the laws of thought : on which are founded the mathematical theories of logic and probabilities. London : Walton and Maberly, 1854.
[83] N. Fairclough, Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge, 2003.
[84] B. Russell, “Analytic Realism,” in Russell on Metaphysics. Selections from the writings of Bertrand Russell, 1 edition., S. Mumford, Ed. London: Routledge, 2003, pp. 91–96.