Investigations on the Seismic Performance of Hot-Finished Hollow Steel Sections

Authors: Paola Pannuzzo, Tak-Ming Chan

Abstract:

In seismic applications, hollow steel sections show, beyond undeniable esthetical appeal, promising structural advantages since, unlike open section counterparts, they are not susceptible to weak-axis and lateral-torsional buckling. In particular, hot-finished hollow steel sections have homogeneous material properties and favorable ductility but have been underutilized for cyclic bending. The main reason is that the parameters affecting their hysteretic behaviors are not yet well understood and, consequently, are not well exploited in existing codes of practice. Therefore, experimental investigations have been conducted on a wide range of hot-finished rectangular hollow section beams with the aim to providing basic knowledge for evaluating their seismic performance. The section geometry (width-to-thickness and depth-to-thickness ratios) and the type of loading (monotonic and cyclic) have been chosen as the key parameters to investigate the cyclic effect on the rotational capacity and to highlight the differences between monotonic and cyclic load conditions. The test results provide information on the parameters that affect the cyclic performance of hot-finished hollow steel beams and can be used to assess the design provisions stipulated in the current seismic codes of practice.

Keywords: Hot-finished steel, hollow sections, cyclic tests, bending.

References:

[1] Gardner, L.; Saari, N.; Wang, F. Comparative experimental study of hot-rolled and cold-formed rectangular hollow sections. Thin-Walled Structures, 2010, 48.7: 495-507.
[2] Nip, K. H.; Gardner, L.; Elghazouli, A. Y. Cyclic testing and numerical modelling of carbon steel and stainless steel tubular bracing members. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32.2: 424-441.
[3] Zhang, X. Z., Liu, S., Zhao, M. S., & Chiew, S. P. Comparative experimental study of hot-formed, hot-finished and cold-formed rectangular hollow sections. Case Studies in Structural Engineering, 2016, 6: 115-129.
[4] AISC 341-16. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, 2016.
[5] Fadden, M., and McCormick, J., Cyclic Quasi-Static Testing of Hollow Structural Section Beam Members, Journal of Structural Engineering, 2012, 138.5: 561-570
[6] Fadden, M., Cyclic Bending Behavior of Hollow Structural Sections and their Applications in Seismic Moment Frame Systems, University of Michigan, 2013.
[7] Fadden, M., and McCormick, J., Finite Element Model of the Cyclic Bending Behavior of Hollow Structural Sections, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 94: 64-75.
[8] EN, CEN. 10210-2. Hot finished structural hollow sections of non-alloy and fine grain steels. Tolerances, dimensions and sectional properties, BSI, London, UK, 2006.
[9] Chen, J. and Chan, T.M., Experimental assessment of the flexural behaviour of concrete-filled steel tubular beams with octagonal sections. Engineering Structures, 2019, 199: 109604.
[10] Venture, S. J., SAC Joint. Protocol for fabrication, inspection, testing, and documentation of beam-column connection tests and other experimental specimens. Rep. No. SAC/BD-97, 1997, 2.