Understanding Student Pilot Mental Workload in Recreational Aircraft Training

Authors: Ron Bishop, Jim Mitchell, Talitha Best

Abstract:

The increase in air travel worldwide has resulted in a pilot shortage. To increase student pilot capacity and lower costs, flight schools have increased the use of recreational aircraft (RA) with technological advanced cockpits in flight schools. The impact of RA based training compared to general aviation (GA) aircraft training on student mental workload is not well understood. This research investigated student pilot (N = 17) awareness of mental workload between technologically advanced cockpit equipped RA training with analogue gauge equipped GA training. The results showed a significantly higher rating of mental workload across subscales of mental and physical demand on the NASA-TLX in recreational aviation aircraft training compared to GA aircraft. Similarly, thematic content analysis of follow-up questions identified that mental workload of the student pilots flying the RA was perceived to be more than the GA aircraft.

Keywords: Glass cockpit, flight training, mental workload, student pilot.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12489599

References:

[1] Boeing Commercial Pilot/Technician outlook, https://www.boeing.com/commercial/market/pilot-technician-outlook/ (Accessed 3 Oct 2019).
[2] Casner, S., 2008. General aviation pilots’ attitudes toward advanced cockpit systems. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 8(1), pp.88-112.
[3] Civil Aviation Order 95.55 (Exemption from the provisions of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988
[4] Colle, H. A., 2005. Estimating a Mental Workload Redline in a Simulated Air-to-Ground Combat Mission. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 15, 303-319.
[5] Dahlstrom, N. & Nahlinder, S. 2009. Mental Workload in Aircraft and Simulator During Basic Civil Aviation Training. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 19, 309-325.
[6] Dahlstrom, N., Nahlinder, S., Wilson, G. F. & Svensson, E. 2011. Recording of Psychophysiological Data During Aerobatic Training. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 21, 105-122.
[7] Domenico, & Nussbaum. (2008). Interactive effects of physical and mental workload on subjective workload assessment. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(11), 977-983.
[8] Flight Safety Fow2undation. (2017). Short Supply - Flight Safety Foundation. (online) Available at: https://flightsafety.org/asw-article/short-supply/ (Accessed 19 May 2017).
[9] Hart, S. G. (2006) ‘Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later’, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(9), pp. 904–908. doi: 10.1177/154193120605000909.
[10] International Air Transport Association (IATA) (2017). https://www.iata.org/about/Documents/iata-annual-review-2015.pdf (Accessed 25 Dec. 2017).
[11] Mitchell, J., Kristovics, A. and Bishop, R., 2010. Glass cockpits in general aviation: a comparison of men and women pilots' perceptions. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 10(2), pp.11-29.
[12] Kristovics, A., Mitchell, J., Bishop, R., Naidoo, P. and Vermeulen, L., 2014. Automation in light aircraft: a cross-national analysis. Absent Aviators: Gender Issues in Aviation, pp.211-238.
[13] Lemos, Schnell, Gordon, & Etherington. (2002). "Bye-bye steam gages, welcome glass": A review of new display technology for general aviation aircraft. Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 2002. Proceedings. The 21st, 2, 10A4. (7), 17.
[14] Lohi, J. J., Huttunen, K. H., Lahtinen, T. M., Kilpeläinen, A. A., Muhli, A. A. & Leino, T. K. 2007. Effect of Caffeine on Simulator Flight Performance in Sleep-Deprived Military Pilot Students. Military Medicine, 172, 982-987.
[15] Mansikka, H., Simola, P., Virtanen, K., Harris, D. & Oksama, L. 2016. Fighter pilots’ heart rate, heart rate variation and performance during instrument approaches. Ergonomics, 1-9.
[16] Mitchell, J., Kristovics, A. and Bishop, R., 2010. Glass cockpits in general aviation: a comparison of men and women pilots' perceptions. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 10(2), pp.11-29.
[17] Permanent Access GPO, Introduction of Glass Cockpit Avionics into Light Aircraft, https://permanent.access.gpo.gov/gpo54086/glass cockpit/SS1001.pdf, NTSB/SS-01/10 PB2010-917001 Aircraft (Accessed 27 Dec. 2017).
[18] Rubio, S., Díaz, E., Martín, J. and Puente, J.M., 2004. Evaluation of subjective mental workload: A comparison of SWAT, NASA‐TLX, and workload profile methods. Applied Psychology, 53(1), pp.61-86.
[19] Soares, M. M., Jacobs, K., Bezerra, F. G. V. & Ribeiro, S. L. O. 2012. Preliminary study of the pilot's workload during emergency procedures in helicopters air operations. Work, 41, 225-231.
[20] Wei, Zongmin, Zhuang, Damin, Wanyan, Xiaoru, Liu, Chen, & Zhuang, Huan. (2014). A model for discrimination and prediction of mental workload of aircraft cockpit display interface. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 27(5), 1070-1077.
[21] Wilson, G. F. 2002. An Analysis of Mental Workload in Pilots During Flight Using Multiple Psychophysiological Measures. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 12, 3-18.
[22] Wright, S. and O'Hare, D., 2015. Can a glass cockpit display help (or hinder) performance of novices in simulated flight training?. Applied ergonomics, 47, pp.292-299.