The Role of Satisfaction on Performance among Afe Babalola University Team Sports
Authors: B. O. Diyaolu
Viability and competency during competition is the dream of every team sports so as to have a good result. But it seems factors abound which deter the performance of even a good sports team. Different individuals with different state of mind all come together to perform in team sports with different degree of satisfaction. This study investigated the role of satisfaction on performance among Afe Babalola University team sports. Descriptive survey research design was used and the population consists of all male and female athletes in the team sports that participated in the last 2019 Ekiti State Higher Institution games (ESHIGA). Total enumeration technique was used for the three team sports; football (44), basketball (24) and volleyball (24). A total of 92 participants were involved in the research. The instrument used for the study was a modified Athlete Satisfaction Scale (ASS). The questionnaire was divided into two sections. The Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient of 0.71 was obtained. The hypotheses were tested at 0.05 significant levels. The completed questionnaire was collated, coded, and analyzed using descriptive statistics of frequency counts and percentage and inferential statistics of chi-square (X2). Findings of this study revealed that satisfaction significantly influences team sports performance among Athletes of Afe Babalola University. The responsibility of satisfying athlete lies on the coaches, fans, sports administrators as well as organizers of such event, as it is not only financial reward that gives satisfaction. The performance of a team sports is quiet important and its being determined by the degree of satisfaction of each individual that make up the team. All effort must be made to satisfy athlete in order to guarantee optimum performance.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3566385Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 210
 H. A. Riemer and P. Chelladurai. Development of the Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire (ASQ). Journal of Sport Exercise Psychology 1998. Vol. 20(2), Pg. 127–156.
 S. S. Heng. The relationship between team characteristics with team performance in Malaysian team. Unpublished Masters Dissertation 2006.
 B. Metcaife and A. Linstea. Gendering teamwork re-writing the feminine Gender, work and organization 2003.Vol. 10, Pg. 94-119
 J. N. Choi. External activities and team effectiveness review and theoretical development teams’ small group research 2002. Vol. 33(2) Pg. 181-208
 W. Smith. Athlete’s satisfaction and the peak events adapting the Athlete Satisfaction Questionnaire to a New Zealand setting. An Unpublished Ph.D. thesis 2010.
 G. Caliskan and H. O. Baydar. Satisfaction Scale for Athlete (SSA): A Study of validity and reliability. European Scientific Journal 2016. vol.12. Pg. 116-122
 Z. Altahayneh. The effects of coaches’ behaviors and burnout on the satisfaction and burnout of athletes 2003.
 H. A. Riemer and K. Toon. Leadership and Satisfaction in Tennis: Examination of congruence, Gender and Ability. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 2001. Vol 72(3), Pg. 243–256.
 N. Sriboon. Coach Leadership Behaviors, Team Cohesion, and Athlete Satisfaction in Relation to the Performance of Athletes in the 1999 Rajabhat Games. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation 2001. The Florida State University, Tallahassee.
 J. A. Moriana-Elvira and J. Herruzo-Cabrera. Stress and burnout in teachers. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology 2004. Vol. 4, Pg. 597-621.
 J. C. Hutchinson and G. Tenenbaum. Attention focus during physical effort: The mediating role of task intensity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2007. Vol. 8, Pg. 233-245
 R. S. Vealey and M. A. Chase. Self-confidence in sport: Conceptual and research Advances. In T.S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology 2008 Pg. 65-97. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
 A. J. Amoros. Coaching effectiveness: Exploring the relationship between coaching behavior and motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. In N. Chatzisarantis y M. S. Hagger (Eds.), Self determination in sport and exercise 2007. Pg. 209–227. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
 K. J. Bartholomew, N. Ntoumanis and C. Thøgersen-Ntoumani. A review of controlling motivation strategies from a self-determination theory perspective: Implications for coaches. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2009. Vol. 2. Pg. 215–233.
 A. V. Carron and M. A. Eys. Group dynamics in sport 4th ed.. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology 2012.
 K. S. Spink, K. S. Wilson and C. S. Priebe. Groupness and adherence in structured exercise settings. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 2010. Vol. 14. Pg. 163–173.
 T. Melake. Practices and challenges of football coaching Leadership style and players satisfaction: The case of Addis Ababa National League Clubs. An unpublished Masters Thesis submitted to the department of sport science of Addis Ababa University 2014.
 A. Papaioannou, G. Ampatzoglou, P. Kalogiannis and A. Sagovits. Social agents, achievement goals, satisfaction and academic achievement in youth sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2008. Vol. 9. Pg. 122-141.
 S. B. Ogunleye.2011 Motivation, Personal Satisfaction of Team Members and Conformity to Team Norms as Predictors of Team Performance An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia 2011 Vol. 5 (4), Pg. 439-448.