Investigating Iraqi EFL Undergraduates' Performance in the Production of Number Forms in English

Authors: Adnan Z. Mkhelif

Abstract:

The production of number forms in English tends to be problematic for Iraqi learners of English as a foreign language (EFL), even at the undergraduate level. To help better understand and consequently address this problem, it is important to identify its sources. This study aims at: (1) statistically analysing Iraqi EFL undergraduates' performance in the production of number forms in English; (2) classifying learners' errors in terms of their possible major causes; and (3) outlining some pedagogical recommendations relevant to the teaching of number forms in English. It is hypothesized in this study that (1) Iraqi EFL undergraduates still face problems in the production of number forms in English and (2) errors pertaining to the context of learning are more numerous than those attributable to the other possible causes. After reviewing the literature available on the topic, a written test comprising 50 items has been constructed and administered to a randomly chosen sample of 50 second-year college students from the Department of English, College of Education, Wasit University. The findings of the study showed that Iraqi EFL undergraduates still face problems in the production of number forms in English and that the possible major sources of learners’ errors can be arranged hierarchically in terms of the percentages of errors to which they can be ascribed as follows: (1) context of learning (50%), (2) intralingual transfer (37%), and (3) interlingual transfer (13%). It is hoped that the implications of the study findings will be beneficial to researchers, syllabus designers, as well as teachers of English as a foreign/second language.

Keywords: L2 morphology, L2 number forms, L2 vocabulary learning, productive knowledge.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3566263

References:

[1] Aziz, Yowell Y. (1989) A Contrastive Grammar of English and Arabic. Mosul: Higher Education Press.
[2] Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum (2005) A Student's Introduction to English Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[3] Crystal, David (2003) A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 5th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
[4] Murphy, Raymond (1994) English Grammar in Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[5] Praninskas, Jean (1975) Rapid Review of English Grammar. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[6] Quirk, Randolph and Sidney Greenbaum (1973) A University Grammar of English. Essex: Longman Group Limited.
[7] Field, Andy (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS statistics (3rd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
[8] Richards, Jack C. and Richard Schmidt (2002) Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
[9] Bailey, Kathleen M. (1998) Learning about Language Assessment. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
[10] Corder, S. Pit (1981) ''Strategies of Communication'' In S. Pit Corder. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press,103-106.
[11] Brown, D. (2006) Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[12] Ortega, L. (2009) Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.
[13] Mitchell, R., Myles, F. and Marsden, E. (2013) Second Language Learning Theories. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
[14] Ellis, Rod (1986) Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.