How Children Synchronize with Their Teacher: Evidence from a Real-World Elementary School Classroom

Authors: Reiko Yamamoto

Abstract:

This paper reports on how synchrony occurs between children and their teacher, and what prevents or facilitates synchrony. The aim of the experiment conducted in this study was to precisely analyze their movements and synchrony and reveal the process of synchrony in a real-world classroom. Specifically, the experiment was conducted for around 20 minutes during an English as a foreign language (EFL) lesson. The participants were 11 fourth-grade school children and their classroom teacher in a public elementary school in Japan. Previous researchers assert that synchrony causes the state of flow in a class. For checking the level of flow, Short Flow State Scale (SFSS) was adopted. The experimental procedure had four steps: 1) The teacher read aloud the first half of an English storybook to the children. Both the teacher and the children were at their own desks. 2) The children were subjected to an SFSS check. 3) The teacher read aloud the remaining half of the storybook to the children. She made the children remove their desks before reading. 4) The children were again subjected to an SFSS check. The movements of all participants were recorded with a video camera. From the movement analysis, it was found that the children synchronized better with the teacher in Step 3 than in Step 1, and that the teacher’s movement became free and outstanding without a desk. This implies that the desk acted as a barrier between the children and the teacher. Removal of this barrier resulted in the children’s reactions becoming synchronized with those of the teacher. The SFSS results proved that the children experienced more flow without a barrier than with a barrier. Apparently, synchrony is what caused flow or social emotions in the classroom. The main conclusion is that synchrony leads to cognitive outcomes such as children’s academic performance in EFL learning.

Keywords: Movement synchrony, teacher–child relationships, English as a foreign language, EFL learning.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3455665

References:

[1] K. L. Marsh, M. J. Richardson, & R. C. Schmidt, “Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination,” Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, pp. 320-339, 2009.
[2] M. J. Richardson, K. L. Marsh, & R. C. Schmidt, “Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), pp. 62-79, 2005.
[3] W. S. Condon & L. W. Sander, “Synchrony demonstrated between movements of the neonate and adult speech,” Child Development, 45, pp. 456-462, 1974.
[4] A. Kendon, Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[5] A. Kent, “Synchronization as a classroom dynamic: A practitioner’s perspective,” Mind, Brain, and Education, 7, pp. 13-18, 2013.
[6] V. Gallese, M. N. Eagle, & P. Migone, “International attunement: Mirror neurons and the neural underpinnings of interpersonal relations,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 50(1), pp. 131-175, 2007.
[7] D. Lakens & M. Stel, “If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity,” Social Cognition, 29(1), pp. 1-14, 2011.
[8] M. Richardson, R. L. Garcia, T. D. Frank, M. Gergor, & K. L. Marsh, “Measuring group synchrony: A cluster-phase method for analyzing multivariate movement time-series,” Frontiers in Physiology, 3(405), pp. 1-10, 2012.
[9] M. Csikszentmihalyi, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper Perennial, 1990.
[10] T. Nakano, Workshop: Places for New Learning and Creation. Tokyo: Iwanami-shinsho, 2001.
[11] T. Nakano, Handout given at “The Conference of System Integration Division at Tokyo Institute of Technology,” 2018.
[12] W. Von Raffler-Engel, Aspects of Non-verbal Communication. Swets & Zeitlinger, 1980.
[13] D. Poveda, L. Pulido, M. Morgade, C. Messina, & Z. Hedlova, “Storytelling with sign language interpretation as a multimodal literacy event: Implications for deaf and hearing children,” Language and Education, 22(4), pp. 320-342, 2008.
[14] S. A. Jackson, A. J. Martin, & R. C. Eklund, “Long and short measures of flow: The construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts,” Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30(5), pp. 561-587, 2008.