Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32731
Analysis of the Accuracy of Earth Movement with Drone Surveys

Authors: Raúl Pereda García, Julio Manuel de Luis Ruiz, Elena Castillo López, Rubén Pérez Álvarez, Felipe Piña García


New technologies for the capture of point clouds have experienced a great advance in recent years. In this way, its use has been extended in geomatics, providing measurement solutions that have been popularized without there being, many times, a detailed study of its accuracy. This research focuses on the study of the viability of topographic works with drones incorporating different sensors sensitive to the visible spectrum. The fundamentals have been applied to a road, located in Cantabria (Spain), where a platform extension and the reform of a riprap were being constructed. A total of six flights were made during two months, all of them with GPS as part of the photogrammetric process, and the results were contrasted with those measured with total station. The obtained results show that the choice of the camera and the planning of the flight have an important impact on the accuracy. In fact, the representations with a level of detail corresponding to 1/1000 scale are admissible, depending on the existing vegetation, and obtaining better results in the area of the riprap. This set of techniques is, therefore, suitable for the control of earthworks in road works but with certain limitations which are exposed in this paper.

Keywords: Drone, earth movement control, global position system, surveying technology.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 636


[1] N. Bachiller-Jareno; M.G. Hutchins; M.J. Charlton and H.G. Orr. “A novel application of remote sensing for modeling impacts of tree shading on water quality”. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, vol. 230.
[2] I.V. Florinsky, IV; T.N. Skrypitsyna; S. Trevisani; S.V. Romaikin. “Statistical and visual quality assessment of nearly-global and continental digital elevation models of Trentino, Italy”. Remote Sensing Letters 2019, vol. 10, nºº8, pp 726-735.
[3] I. Colomina; P. Molina. “Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review”. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2014, vol 92, pp79-97.
[4] M. Baeumker; H. Przybilla. “Investigations on the accuracy of the navigation data of unmanned aerial vehicles using the example of the system mikrokopter” International conference on unmanned aerial Vehicle in Geomatics (UAV-G). Book series: international archives of the photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 2011, vol. 38-1, pp 113-118.
[5] S.S.C. Congress; A.J. Puppala; C.L. Lundberg. “Total system error analysis of UAV-CRP technology for monitoring transportation infrastructure assets”. Engineering Geology 2018, vol 247, pp 104-116
[6] J. L. Ogania; G.R. Puno; M.B.T. Alivio; J.M.G: Taylaran. “Effect of digital elevation model’s resolution in producing flood hazard maps”. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management-GJESM” 2019. vol 5, nº 1, pp 95-106.
[7] J.M. De Luis. “Contraste en la ejecución de auscultaciones geodésicas por métodos clásicos y con láser escáner”. Thesis Universidad de Cantabria 2009.