Analysis and Evaluation of the Public Responses to Traffic Congestion Pricing Schemes in Urban Streets

Authors: Saeed Sayyad Hagh Shomar

Abstract:

Traffic congestion pricing in urban streets is one of the most suitable options for solving the traffic problems and environment pollutions in the cities of the country. Unlike its acceptable outcomes, there are problems concerning the necessity to pay by the mass. Regarding the fact that public response in order to succeed in this strategy is so influential, studying their response and behavior to get the feedback and improve the strategies is of great importance. In this study, a questionnaire was used to examine the public reactions to the traffic congestion pricing schemes at the center of Tehran metropolis and the factors involved in people’s decision making in accepting or rejecting the congestion pricing schemes were assessed based on the data obtained from the questionnaire as well as the international experiences. Then, by analyzing and comparing the schemes, guidelines to reduce public objections to them are discussed. The results of reviewing and evaluating the public reactions show that all the pros and cons must be considered to guarantee the success of these projects. Consequently, with targeted public education and consciousness-raising advertisements, prior to initiating a scheme and ensuring the mechanism of the implementation after the start of the project, the initial opposition is reduced and, with the gradual emergence of the real and tangible benefits of its implementation, users’ satisfaction will increase.

Keywords: Demand management, international experiences, traffic congestion pricing, public acceptance, public objection.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3299685

References:

[1] B. Ubbels, E. Verhoef, “Behavioral Responses to Road Pricing: Empirical results from a survey among Dutch car owners,” Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 85th annual meeting, 2006.
[2] M. Burris, K. Sadabadi, S. Mattingly, M. Mahlawat, J. Li, I. Rasmidatta, A. Saroosh, “Reaction to the Managed Lane Concept by Various Groups of Travelers,” Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
[3] A. Evans, M. Smirti, M. Gougherty, E. Morris, “Politics, Public Opinion, and Project Design in California Road Pricing,” Presented at the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., 2007.
[4] J. M. Benjamin, R. Sakano, B. McKinney, A. J. Khattak, D. A. Rodriguez, C. Gaskins, “An Analysis of HOT Lanes in North Carolina,” Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting, 2007.
[5] A. Cain, “Achieving Majority Public Support for Urban Road Pricing-Preserving the Driver’s Right to Choose,” Presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
[6] K. Podgorski, K. Kockelman, “Public Perceptions of Toll Roads: A Survey of the Texas Perspective,” Presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
[7] D. Ungemah, T. Collier, “I'll Tell You What I Think! A National Review of How the Public Perceives Pricing,” Paper presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007.
[8] T. Garling, L. Steg, “Treats from car traffic to quality of urban life: problems, causes, solutions”, Elsevier Science; 1 edition, 2007.
[9] T. Gehlert, C. Kramer, O. Nielsen, B. Schlg, “Socioeconomic differences in public acceptability and car use adaptation towards urban road pricing”, Transport Policy, Vol.18, Issue 5, pp.685-694, 2011.
[10] T. Litman, “London Congestion Pricing: Implications for Other Cities,” Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada 2006.
[11] J. Holguin-Veras, K. Ozbay, A. de Cerrano, “Evaluation Study of Port Authority of New York and New Jersey’s Time of Day Pricing Initiative,” Draft Final Report, 2005.
[12] A. D. May, A. Sumalee, “One Step Forwards, Two Steps Back? An Overview of Road Pricing Application and Research Outside the US,” Proc. of International Symposium on Road Pricing, Key Biscayne Florida, 2003.
[13] Brinckerhoff, Quade, Douglas, “High Occupancy Toll Lanes and Truck Only Toll Facilities: Potential for Implementation in the Atlanta Region,” Draft Focus Group Report, Prepared for Georgia State Road and Toll way Authority, Atlanta, 2004.
[14] J. Zmud, S. Peterson, F. Douma, “Preliminary before and After Results of the I-394 HOT Lane Panel Survey,” Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2007
[15] L. W. Munnich, J. D. Loveland, “Value Pricing and Public Outreach: Minnesota's Lessons Learned,” Transportation Research Record 1932, 164-168, 2005.