Research of the Factors Affecting the Administrative Capacity of Enterprises in the Logistic Sector of Bulgaria
The human factor plays a major role in boosting the competitive capacity of logistic enterprises. This is of particular importance when it comes to logistic companies. On the one hand they should be strictly compliant with legislation; on the other hand, they should be competitive in terms of pricing and of delivery timelines. Moreover, their policies should allow them to be as flexible as possible. All these circumstances are reason for very serious challenges for the qualification, motivation and experience of the human resources, working in logistic companies or in logistic departments of trade and industrial enterprises. The geographic place of Bulgaria puts it in position of a country with some specific competitive advantages in the goods transport from Europe to Asia and back. Along with it, there is a number of logistic companies, that operate in this sphere in Bulgaria. In the current paper, the authors aim to establish the condition of the administrative capacity and human resources in the logistic companies and logistic departments of trade and industrial companies in Bulgaria in order to propose some guidelines for improving of their effectiveness. Due to independent empirical research, conducted in Bulgarian logistic, trade and industrial enterprises, the authors investigate both the impact degree and the interdependence of various factors that characterize the administrative capacity. The study is conducted with a prepared questionnaire, in format of direct interview with the respondents. The volume of the poll is 50 respondents, representatives of: general managers of industrial or trade enterprises; logistic managers of industrial or trade enterprises; general managers of forwarding companies – either with own or with hired transport; experts from Bulgarian association of logistics; logistic lobbyist and scientists of the relevant area. The data are gathered for 3 months, then arranged by a specialized software program and analyzed by preset criteria. Based on the results of this methodological toolbox, it can be claimed that there is a correlation between the individual criteria. Also, a commitment between the administrative capacity and other factors that determine the competitiveness of the studied companies is established. In this paper, the authors present results of the empirical research that concerns the number and the workload in the logistic departments of the enterprises. Also, what is commented is the experience, related to logistic processes management and human resources competence. Moreover, the overload level of the logistic specialists is analyzed as one of the main threats for making mistakes and losing clients. The paper stands behind the thesis that there is indispensability of forming an effective and efficient administrative capacity, based on the number, qualification, experience and motivation of the staff in the logistic companies. The paper ends with recommendations about the qualification and experience of the specialists in logistic departments; providing effective and efficient administrative capacity in the logistic departments; interdependence of the human factor and the other factors that influence the enterprise competitiveness.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3299387Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF
 P. Dimitrov, “Оценка на развитието на логистиката в България въз основа на международни сравнения“, “Evaluation of logistic development in Bulgaria, based on international comparisons“ in Логистиката Настояще и Бъдеще, Logistics. Present and Future, S. IBIS, 2011, pp. 14-23.
 M. Rakovska, “Сравнителна оценка на ефективността на логистиката в България и Германия“, “Comparative Assessment of the Logistics performance in Bulgaria and Germany” in Иновативни стратегии за конкурентоспособен бизнес, Innovative strategies for competitive business, IBS, Botevgrad, 2015, pp. 46-53.
 D. Donchev, Анализ на стопанската дейност, Analysis of economic activity, 2004, ch. 5, pp 63-78.
 M. I. Qureshi, M. Iftikhar, S.G. Abbas, U.Hassan, K. Khan, K.Khalid. “Relationship Between Job Stress, Workload, Environment and Employees Turnover Intentions: What We Know, What Should We Know” in World Applied Sciences Journal 23 (6), 2013, pp. 764 – 770.
 S. Ladan, N. Nordin, H.M. Belal, “Does Social Support and Burnout Matter? Effects of Role Conflict and Workload on Workplace Bullying: A Proposed Framework.” in Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, Feb 2017, vol. 5, issue 2.
 D. Shopov, M. Atanasova, T. Shopov, M. Peicheva, Управление на човешките ресурси, Human Resource Management, 2003, vol. 2, ch. 6, pp. 260-287.
 D. Donchev, M. Velev, Y. Dimitrov, Икономика на предприятието, Enterprise Economics, 1998, ch.7, pp.225-231.
 P. Dullayaphut, S. Untachai, „Development the Measurement of Human Resource Competency in SMEs in Upper Northeastern Region of Thailand“ in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 88 ( 2013 ), pp. 61 – 72.
 C. Zehir, Y. Gurol, T. Karaboga, M. Kole, “Strategic Human Resource Management and Firm Performance: The Mediating Role of Enterpreneurial Orientation” in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 235 (2016), pp. 372 – 381.
 N. Hadziahmetovic, M.S. Dinc, K. Jahic, “A Research Review of Motivation-Enhancing of Human Resource Practices” in Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 2017, vol. 4, No. 2.
 R. Palšaitis K. Čižiūnienė, K. Vaičiūtė, “Improvement of Warehouse Operations Management by Considering Competencies of Human Resources” in Procedia Engineering 187 (2017), pp. 604 – 613.
 K. Anguelov, Мениджмънт, Management, 2007, ch. 3, p. 60.