Products in Early Development Phases: Ecological Classification and Evaluation Using an Interval Arithmetic Based Calculation Approach
As a pillar of sustainable development, ecology has become an important milestone in research community, especially due to global challenges like climate change. The ecological performance of products can be scientifically conducted with life cycle assessments. In the construction sector, significant amounts of CO2 emissions are assigned to the energy used for building heating purposes. Therefore, sustainable construction materials for insulating purposes are substantial, whereby aerogels have been explored intensively in the last years due to their low thermal conductivity. Therefore, the WALL-ACE project aims to develop an aerogel-based thermal insulating plaster that would achieve minor thermal conductivities. But as in the early stage of development phases, a lot of information is still missing or not yet accessible, the ecological performance of innovative products bases increasingly on uncertain data that can lead to significant deviations in the results. To be able to predict realistically how meaningful the results are and how viable the developed products may be with regard to their corresponding respective market, these deviations however have to be considered. Therefore, a classification method is presented in this study, which may allow comparing the ecological performance of modern products with already established and competitive materials. In order to achieve this, an alternative calculation method was used that allows computing with lower and upper bounds to consider all possible values without precise data. The life cycle analysis of the considered products was conducted with an interval arithmetic based calculation method. The results lead to the conclusion that the interval solutions describing the possible environmental impacts are so wide that the result usability is limited. Nevertheless, a further optimization in reducing environmental impacts of aerogels seems to be needed to become more competitive in the future.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3298777Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF
 O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, J. C. Minx (eds.), IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Interngovernmental Panel on Climate Change. USA: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
 N. Hüsing, U. Schubert, “Aerogele – luftige Materialien: Chemie, Struktur und Eigenschaften,” Angewandte Chemie, vol. 110, pp. 22–47, January 1998.
 A.C. Hetherington, A.L. Borrion, O.G. Griffiths, M.C. McManus, “Use of LCA as a development tool within early research: challenges and issues across different sectors,” Int J Life Cycle Assess, vol. 19, pp.130–143, January 2014.
 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework, EN ISO 14040, 2006.
 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines, EN ISO 14044, 2006.
 J. Schwarte, H. Hein, “Treatment of Uncertainties in Green Engineering,” in IOP: Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, to be published.
 F. Ritter, Lebensdauer von Bauteilen und Bauelementen. Modellierung und praxisnahe Prognose. Darmstadt: Institut für Massivbau, 2011.
 C. E. Pohl, Auch zu präzis ist ungenau. Unsicherheitsanalyse in Oekobilanzen und Alternativen zu „use many methods. Zürich: ETH Zürich, 1999.
 M. Roš, Unsicherheit und Fuzziness in ökologischen Bewertungen. Orientierungen zu einer robusten Praxis der Oekobilanzierung. Zürich: ETH Zürich, 1998.
 J. Reap, F. Roman, S. Duncan, B. Bras, “A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 2: impact assessment and interpretation,” Int J Life Cycle Assess, vol. 13, pp. 374–388, May 2008.
 G. Finnveden, N. Z. Hausschild, T. Ekvall, J. Guinée, R. Heijungs, S. Hellweg, A. Koehler, D. Pennington, S. Suh, “Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessments, ” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 91, pp. 1–21, August 2009.
 J.-L. Chevalier, J.-F. Le Téno, “Life Cycle Analysis with Ill-Defined Data and its Application to Building Products,” Int. J. LCA, vol. 1, pp.90–96, June 1996.
 J. Schwarte, “Eine einfache Java-Klassenbibliothek für Öko-Sachbilanz-Studien in Forschung und Lehre,”, in Werkstoffe, Denkmalschutz und…. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Garrecht, J. Hofman (eds.), Stuttgart: IWB, 2017, pp. 327-336.
 H. Hein, J. Schwarte, CInnovative insulation materials - specific issues performing LCA in early development phases,” Advanced Materials Proceedings, vol. 3, pp. 531–535, November–December 2018.
 A. Ciroth, Fehlerrechnung in Ökobilanzen. Berlin: TU Berlin, 2011.
 A. Ciroth, AP 4. Fehlerrechnung, Datenqualität, Unsicherheit. Berlin Karlsruhe, Mai 2006.
 F. Dinkel, Skript: Ökobilanzen. Lebenszyklusanalyse. Life cycle analysis. Basel, Juli 2013.
 S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller (eds.), IPCC, 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
 J.T. Houghton, L.G. Meira Filho, B.A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, K. Maskel, Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Contribution of WGI to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
 Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri, L.A. Meyer (eds.), IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 2015.