Government Responses to the Survivors of Trafficking in Human Beings: A Study of Albania
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32797
Government Responses to the Survivors of Trafficking in Human Beings: A Study of Albania

Authors: Irida Agolli Nasufi, Anxhela Bruci


This paper presents Albanian government policies regarding the reintegration process for returning Albanian survivors of trafficking in human beings. Focusing on an in-depth analysis of governmental, non-governmental documents and semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted with service providers and trafficking survivors. Furthermore, this paper will especially focus on the governmental efforts to provide support to the survivors, focusing on their needs and challenges. This study explores the conditions and actual services provided to the survivors of trafficking in human beings that are in the reintegration process in Albania. Moreover, it examines the responsible mechanisms accountable for the reintegration process, by analysing synergies between governmental and non-governmental organisations. Also, this paper explores the governmental approach towards trafficking survivors and apprises policymakers to undertake changes and reforms in their future actions.

Keywords: Policies, social services, service user, trafficking in human beings, government.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 708


[1] U. S. Department of State. (2012). Trafficking in persons report. (Online). Available at 2012 (Accessed 10 February 2019).
[2] United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2018). Global report on trafficking in persons. Vienna: Division for Policy Analysis and Public Affairs.
[3] Laczko, F. (2005). Data and research on human trafficking. International Migration. Vol. 43(1), 5 – 16.
[4] Child Welfare Information Gateway. (2016). State Statutes, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (Online). Available at (Accessed 22 February 2019).
[5] POLARIS. (2017). The typology of modern slavery defining sex and labour trafficking in the United States. (Online). Available at Accessed (22 February 2019).
[6] Eerz, E. (2010). Women as victims and survivors in the context of transnational human trafficking for commercial sex exploitation. Dans Revue Internationale De Droit Pénal, 4 (81), 551- 562.
[7] Home Office. (2019). Country Policy and Information Note Albania: People trafficking. London: Independent Advisory Group on Country Information.
[8] BAWSO. (2012). Overcoming barriers and healing the scars of human trafficking. Cardiff: Head Office.
[9] Barrett, N. A. (2010). An exploration of promising practices in response to human trafficking in Canada. Vancouver: International Centre for Criminal Law Reform and Criminal Justice Policy.
[10] International Labour Organization. (2009). The Cost of Coercion. Geneva: ILO.
[11] OSCE. (2014). Policy Recommendations and Legislation towards the effective implementation of the principle of non-punishment of the victims of trafficking. The Office of the Special Representative and the Coordinator for the Fight against Trafficking in Human Beings.
[12] Different & Equal. (2017). Annual Report. Tirana: D & E.
[13] President Interagency Task Force. (2017). Report on US government effort to combat trafficking in persons. Washington: Department of State.
[14] Hodge, D. R. (2014). Assisting Victims of Human Trafficking: Strategies to facilitate identification, exit from trafficking, and the restoration of wellness. Social Work, Vol 59, (2), 111–118.
[15] Hopper, E. and Hidalgo, J. (2006). Invisible chains: psychological coercion of human trafficking victims. Intercultural Human Rights Law, 1, 185-211.
[16] La Strada International and Ariadne. (2015). Guidelines on rehabilitation and (re)integration of trafficked persons: a manual for the Western Balkan Region. Moldova: International Center “La Strada”.
[17] Machi, L. A., and McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The Literature Review: Six steps to success. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press
[18] Trainor, D., Belser, G., and Belser P. (2006). Globalization and the Illicit Market for Human Trafficking: An Empirical Analysis of Supply and Demand (Report no. Wp.53). Special Action Programme to Combat Forced Labour. Geneva: International Labour Office.
[19] Kohn, N. A. (2014). Vulnerability Theory and the Role of Government. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 26(1), 1-27.
[20] European Court of Human Rights. (2018). Guide on Article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Prohibition of slavery and forced labour. (Online). Available at Accessed (5 January 2019).
[21] U. S. Department of state. (2018). Trafficking in person report, Tier 2. Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons.
[22] DCM Nr. 499, dated 29.8.2018 on approval of standard action protection procedures of victims and possible victims of trafficking in human beings.
[23] Hill, M. and P. Hupe (2005). Implementing Public Policy. London: Sage Publications.
[24] Birkland, T. A. (2015). An introduction to the policy process: theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. 4th ed. London: Routledge.
[25] Hudson, J and Lowe, S, (2009). Understanding the policy process: analysing the welfare policy and practice, 2. Bristol: The Policy Press.
[26] Hill, M. and Varone, F. (2017). The Public Policy Process. 7th ed. London: Routledge.
[27] Bevir, M. (2009). Key concepts in governance. London: Sage Publications.
[28] Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
[29] May, P. J. and Winter, S. C. (2007). Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 453–476.
[30] Barton, A. and Johns, N. (2013). The policy - making process in the criminal justice system. London: Routledge.
[31] Korthagen, F. A. J. (2007). The gap between research and practice revisited. Educational research and evaluation, 13(3), 303-310.
[32] Malloch, M., Rigby, P. (2016). Human trafficking: the complexities of exploitation Edinburgh University Press
[33] DCM No. 27, dated 11.01.2012 “On the employment promotion programme for women and special-needs groups”.
[34] DCM No. 47, dated 16.1.2008 “On the employment promotion programme through development at work”.
[35] Ministry of Internal Affairs. (2016). National Action Plan for the Socio-Economic Re-Integration of Women and Girls Victims of Trafficking in the Republic of Albania. Tirana: International Organisation for Migration.
[36] Albanian Centre for Population and Development. (2016). Shadow report: healthcare field: case of Albania. Submitted to the United Nations Committee on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. Tirana: Albanian Centre for Population and Development (ACPD).
[37] Brunovskis, A., and Surtees, R. (2012). No place like home? Challenges in family reintegration after trafficking. Norway: NEXUS Institute.
[38] Gideon, L. (2007). Family Role in the Reintegration Process of Recovering Drug Addicts: A Qualitative Review of Israeli Offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51 (2), 212- 226.
[39] International Organization for Migration. (2014). Needs assessment: human trafficking in the Western Balkans. Geneva: Research Communication Group.
[40] Beals, K. P., Peplau, L. A., & Gable, S. L. (2009). Stigma management and wellbeing: The role of perceived social support, emotional processing, and suppression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(7), 867- 879.