LEED Empirical Evidence in Northern and Southern Europe

Authors: Svetlana Pushkar

Abstract:

The Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) green building rating system is recognized in Europe. LEED uses regional priority (RP) points that are adapted to different environmental conditions. However, the appropriateness of the RP points is still a controversial question. To clarify this issue, two different parts of Europe: northern Europe (Finland and Sweden) and southern Europe (Turkey and Spain) were considered. Similarities and differences in the performances of LEED 2009-new construction (LEED-NC 2009) in these four countries were analyzed. It was found that LEED-NC 2009 performances in northern and southern parts of Europe in terms of Sustainable Sites (SS), Water Efficiency (WE), Materials and Resources (MR), and Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) were similar, whereas in Energy and Atmosphere (EA), their performances were different. WE and SS revealed high performances (70-100%); EA and EQ demonstrated intermediate performance (40-60%); and MR displayed low performance (20-40%). It should be recommended introducing the following new RP points: for Turkey - water-related points and for all four observed countries - green power-related points for improving the LEED adaptation in Europe.

Keywords: Green building, Europe, LEED, regional priority points.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2576912

References:

[1] J. Faulconbridge, “Mobilising sustainable building assessment models: agents, strategies and local effects,” Area, vol. 47, pp. 116-123, Feb. 2015.
[2] P. Wu, Y. Song, W. Shou, H. Chi, H.Y. Chong, M. Sutrisna, “A comprehensive analysis of the credits obtained by LEED 2009 certified green buildings,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev, vol. 68, pp. 370–379, 2017.
[3] USGBC. LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations. Available online: https://www.usgbc.org/Docs/Archive/General/Docs8868.pdf (accessed on 12 March 2018).
[4] P. Wu, Y. Song, J. Wang, X Wang, X. Zhao, Q. He, “Regional Variations of Credits Obtained by LEED 2009 Certified Green Buildings—A Country Level Analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 10, pp.20, 2018.
[5] USGBC 2014. US Green Building Council (USGBC). Regional Priority Credits directory. Available online: http://www.usgbc.org/rpc (accessed on 10 March 2018).
[6] W. A. S. Neama, “Protect the planet through sustainability rating systems with local environmental criteria - LEED in the Middle East,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 68, pp. 752 – 766, 2012.
[7] R. J. Cole, M. J. Valdebenito, “The importation of building environmental certification systems: international usages of BREEAM and LEED,” Build Res Inform, vol. 41, pp. 662-676, 2013.
[8] R. Komurlu, D. Arditi, A. P. Gurgun, “Applicability of LEED’s energy and atmosphere category in three developing countries,” Energ Build, vol. DEC, pp. 690-697, 2014.
[9] O. Suzer, “A comparative review of environmental concern prioritization: LEED vs other major certification systems,” J Environ Manage, vol. 154, pp. 266-283, MAY, 2015.
[10] E. Heiskanen, K. Matschoss, Intelligent Energy Europe: Report on specific features of public and social acceptance and perception of nearly zero - energy buildings and renewable heating and cooling in Europe with a specific focus on the target countries, 2012, 138p.
[11] S. H. Hurlbert, “Pseudofactorialism, response structures and collective responsibility,” Austral Ecology, vol. 38, pp. 646‐663, 2013.
[12] H. B. Mann, D. R. Whitney, “On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other,” Ann. Math. Stat, vol. 18, pp. 50–60, 1947.
[13] USGBC. LEED for New Construction Projects Directory. Available online: http://www.usgbc.org/projects/new-construction (accessed on 10 May 2018).
[14] N. Cliff, “Dominance statistics: Ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions,” Psychol. Bull, vol. 114, pp. 494–509, 1993.
[15] F. Zhang, A. Mockus, I. Keivanloo, Y. Zou, “Towards building a universal defect prediction model with rank transformed predictors,” Empir. Softw. Eng, vol. 21, pp. 2107–2145, 2016.
[16] S. H. Hurlbert, C. M. Lombardi, “Final collapse of the Neyman-Pearson decision theoretic framework and rise of the neoFisherian,” Ann. Zool. Fenn, vol. 46, pp. 311–349, 2009.
[17] S. H. Hurlbert, C. M. Lombardi, “Lopsided reasoning on lopsided tests and multiple comparisons,” Aust. N. Z. J. Stat, vol. 54, pp. 23–42, 2012.
[18] S. Pushkar, O. Verbitsky, “LEED-NCv3 silver and gold certified projects in the US: An observational study,” Journal of Green Building, vol. 13, pp. 67- 83, 2018.