Effectiveness Evaluation of a Machine Design Process Based on the Computation of the Specific Output

Authors: Barenten Suciu

Abstract:

In this paper, effectiveness of a machine design process is evaluated on the basis of the specific output calculus. Concretely, a screw-worm gear mechanical transmission is designed by using the classical and the 3D-CAD methods. Strength analysis and drawing of the designed parts is substantially aided by employing the SolidWorks software. Quality of the design process is assessed by manufacturing (printing) the parts, and by computing the efficiency, specific load, as well as the specific output (work) of the mechanical transmission. Influence of the stroke, travelling velocity and load on the mechanical output, is emphasized. Optimal design of the mechanical transmission becomes possible by the appropriate usage of the acquired results.

Keywords: Mechanical transmission, design, screw, worm-gear, efficiency, specific output, 3D-printing.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2571952

References:

[1] J. A. Collins, H. R. Busby, and G. H. Staab, Mechanical Design of Machine Elements and Machines. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2009, pp. 231–890.
[2] M. Izawa, Machine Design Engineering. Tokyo: Rikogakusha, 2010, pp. 1–342 (in Japanese).
[3] R. C. Johnson, Optimum Design of Mechanical Elements. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1961, pp. 1–301.
[4] R. C. Juvinall, and K. M. Marshek, Fundamentals of Machine Component Design. New York: John Willey and Sons, 2006, pp. 1–769.
[5] R. L. Mott, Machine Elements in Mechanical Design. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2004, pp. 11–872.
[6] H. A. Rothbart, Mechanical Design and Systems Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1985, pp. 7–173.
[7] M. F. Spotts, T. E. Shoup, and L. E. Hornberger, Design of Machine Elements. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 2003, pp. 23–324.
[8] G. W. Stachowiak, and A. W. Batchelor, Engineering Tribology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005, pp. 1–795.
[9] T. Tsukada, Y. Yoshimura, S. Kurosaki, and F. Yagishita, Methodology of Machine Design. Tokyo: Morikita, 2015, pp. 1–211 (in Japanese).
[10] J. Angeles, and E. Zakhariev, Computational Methods in Mechanical Systems: Mechanism Analysis, Synthesis, and Optimization. Berlin: Springer, 1998, pp. 1–425.
[11] F. De Bona, and G. Jacazio, “Simulation of Mechanical Drives with Generalized Power Losses,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 11, pp. 1178–1182, 1988.
[12] A. A. Oledzki, “Modeling and Simulation of Self-locking Drives,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, 30(6), pp. 929–942, 1995.
[13] E. Polak, Computational Methods in Optimization: A Unified Approach. New York: Academic Press, 1971, pp. 1–329.
[14] D. J. Wilde, Global Optimum Design. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1978, pp. 5–67.
[15] C. V. Suciu, H. Goto, and H. Abiru, “Modeling and Simulation of a Screw-Worm Gear Mechanical Transmission to Achieve its Optimal Design under Imposed Constraints,” Journal of Algorithms and Computational Technology, 5(2), pp. 363–382, 2011.
[16] P. Gallina, “Vibration in Screw Jack Mechanisms Experimental Results,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 282(3-5), pp. 1025–1041, 2005.
[17] K. Sano, Design of the Screw Jack. Tokyo: Power Publisher House, 1994, pp. 1–156 (in Japanese).
[18] G. Onwubolu, Computer-Aided Engineering Design with SolidWorks. London: Imperial College Press, 2013, pp. 1–721.