Gender Differences in Biology Academic Performances among Foundation Students of PERMATApintar® National Gifted Center
PERMATApintar® National Gifted Center is, to the author’s best of knowledge, the first center in Malaysia that provides a platform for Malaysian talented students with high ability in thinking. This center has built a teaching and learning biology curriculum that suits the ability of these gifted students. The level of PERMATApintar® biology curriculum is basically higher than the national biology curriculum. Here, the foundation students are exposed to the PERMATApintar® biology curriculum at the age of as early as 11 years old. This center practices a 4-time-a-year examination system to monitor the academic performances of the students. Generally, most of the time, male students show no or low interest towards biology subject compared to female students. This study is to investigate the association of students’ gender and their academic performances in biology examination. A total of 39 students’ scores in twelve sets of biology examinations in 3 years have been collected and analyzed by using the statistical analysis. Based on the analysis, there are no significant differences between male and female students against the biology academic performances with a significant level of p = 0.05. This indicates that gender is not associated with the scores of biology examinations among the students. Another result showed that the average score for male studenta was higher than the female students. Future research can be done by comparing the biology academic achievement in Malaysian National Examination (Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia, SPM) between the Foundation 3 students (Grade 9) and Level 2 students (Grade 11) with similar PERMATApintar® biology curriculum.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1475020Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 393
 Gross, M.U.M., Macleod, B, and Pretorius, M. (2007). Gifted Students in Secondary Schools Differentiating the Curriculum (2nd Ed). GERRIC. The University of New South Wales, Sydney.
 Sulaiman, N.A., Yunus, M.M., and Radzi, A.M. (2014). Cognitive Style in Language Learning Strategies Among Malaysian Gifted Students. Proceedings International Conference on Gifted and Talented Education, 86-96.
 Yassin, S.F.M., Ishak, N.M., Yunus, M.M., and Majid, R.A. (2012). The Identification of Gifted and Talented Students. Procedia-Social and Bahavioral Sciences, 55 (2012), Pp: 585-593.
 Ishak, N.M., Abdullah, R.T., Hassan, S.A., Simin, N., Zakaria, N.D., Hazir, N.S.M and Shah, M.S.M. (2014). Nurturing Academic Performance and Higher Order Thinking of Gifted Students through the PERMATApintar Education Program. Proceedings International Conference on Gifted and Talented Education, 187 – 197.
 Osman, W. S. W. and Yunus, M.M. (2014). The Heart, Mind and Soul of Language Learning For The Gifted. Proceedings International Conference on Gifted and Talented Education, 141 – 147.
 Van Tassel-Baska, J. What Works in Curriculum for the Gifted. Asia Pacific Conference on the Gifted. 18 July 2008. Keynote address.
 Mofield, E., Peters, M.P., and Ghosh, S.C. (2016). Perfectionism, Coping, and Underachievement in Gifted Adolescent: Avoidance vs. Approach Orientions, Education Sciences, 6(21).
 Subotnik, R.F., Kubilius, P.O., and Worrel, F.C. (2011). Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12 (1), 3-54. Retrieved from sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
 Naik, M., and Prabodhini, J. (2014). “Does Accelerated Learning Work? For Which Students?” Proceedings International Conference on Gifted and Talented Education, 171 – 177.
 Rayneri, L.J., Gerber, B.L. and Wiley, L.P. (2006). The Relationship Between Classroom Environment and the Learning Style Preferences of Gifted Middle School Students and The Impact on Levels of Performance, Gifted Child Quarterly, Vol. 50 (2), 104 – 118.
 Osborne, J., Simon, S., and Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, Vol.25 (9), 1049-1079.
 Nasr, A.R. (2011). Attitude Towards Biology and Its Effects on Student’s Achievement. International Journal of Biology, Vol.3(4), 100 – 104.
 Halpern, D.F. (2012). Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities (4th Ed.) (ebook) Psychology Press Taylor and Francis Group, New York. Available at https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ocl5AgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=halpern+sex+differences&ots=WCcPw9qofm&sig=i5tPsZ7Yfrl8cIJDL4ZD9lO878M#v=onepage&q=halpern%20sex%20differences&f=false (Accessed 3 April 2018).
 Tomlinson, C, A., Kaplan, S.N., Renzulli, J.S., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., and Burns, D. (2002). The Parallel Curriculum A Design to Develop High Potential and Challenge High-Ability Learners. Corwin Press, Inc. United States of America.
 Latip, N.A., Lani, N.N., Joli, N.S., Hissam, F.A.B., Badib, A. and Ariffin, S.A. (2014). Analysis of Differentiated Teaching and Learning Method In Additional Mathematics Among Gifted Students Using Rasch Measurement Model, Proceedings International Conference on Gifted and Talented Education, 129 – 136.
 Din, Y.P., Ming, M.C., and Esther, S.C.H. (2004). Hong Kong Student Achievement in OECD-PISA Study: Gender Differences in Science content, Literacy Skills, and Test Item Formats, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 91-106.
 Olszewski-Kubilius and Turner, D. (2002). Gender Differences among Elementary School-Aged Gifted Students in Achievement, Perceptions of Ability, and Subject Prefeence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, Vol. 25 (3), 233-268.
 Buckley, S. Gender and sex differences in students participation, achievement and engagement in mathematics. (2016). Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/learning_processes/18
 Preckel, F., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., and Kleine, M. (2008). Gender Differences in Gifted and Average-Ability Students-Comparing Girls’ and Boys’ Achievment, Self-Concept, Interest, and Motivation in Mathematics. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 146 – 159.
 Hola, I.A. (2005). Uncovering Gender Differences in Science Achievement and Attitudes towards Science for Jordanian Primary Pupils. Damascus University Journal, Vol, 21(1), 19-53.
 Cakiroglu, J. (1999). Gender Difference in the Science Classroom. Journal of Education. 16-17 : 127-133.
 Azhari, A.M., Kamarulzaman, M.H., Faisal, R.A., Hazir, N.M., Esrati, M.Z., Lim, M.R., Joli, N.S., and Ishak, N.M. (2017). Tahap Kecergasan Fizikal Di Kalangan Pelajar Pintar dan Berbakat, E-proceeding of the 6th Global Summit on Education 2017 (GSE 2017), 187 – 197.
 Oludipe and Daniel I. (2012). Gender Differences in Nigerian Junior Secondary Students’ Academic Achievement in Basic Science. Journal of Educational and Social Research, Vol. 2(1), Pp: 93 – 99.
 Amedu, O.I. (2015). The Effect of Gender on the Achievement of Students in Biology Using the Jigsaw Method. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 6 (17), Pp: 176 – 179.
 (2009). Gender Differences in Educational Outcomes: Study on the Measures Taken and the Current Situation in Europe. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA P9 Eurydice)
 Hissam, F.A.B., Kamarulzaman, M.H., Joli, N.S., and Ishak, N.M. (2017). Impak Pengajaran Terbeza Ke Atas Motivasi Pelajar Pintar Dan Berbakat Di Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Subjek Biologi, E-proceeding of the 6th Global Summit on Education 2017 (GSE 2017), 174 – 185.