Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30004
Improved Predictive Models for the IRMA Network Using Nonlinear Optimisation

Authors: Vishwesh Kulkarni, Nikhil Bellarykar

Abstract:

Cellular complexity stems from the interactions among thousands of different molecular species. Thanks to the emerging fields of systems and synthetic biology, scientists are beginning to unravel these regulatory, signaling, and metabolic interactions and to understand their coordinated action. Reverse engineering of biological networks has has several benefits but a poor quality of data combined with the difficulty in reproducing it limits the applicability of these methods. A few years back, many of the commonly used predictive algorithms were tested on a network constructed in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) to resolve this issue. The network was a synthetic network of five genes regulating each other for the so-called in vivo reverse-engineering and modeling assessment (IRMA). The network was constructed in S. cereviase since it is a simple and well characterized organism. The synthetic network included a variety of regulatory interactions, thus capturing the behaviour of larger eukaryotic gene networks on a smaller scale. We derive a new set of algorithms by solving a nonlinear optimization problem and show how these algorithms outperform other algorithms on these datasets.

Keywords: Synthetic gene network, network identification, nonlinear modeling, optimization.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1474948

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF

References:


[1] I. Cantone, L. Marucci, F. Iorio, M. A. Ricci, V. Belcastro, M. Bansal, S. Santini, M. di Bernardo, D. D. Bernardo, and M. P. Cosma, “A yeast synthetic network for in vivo assessment of reverse-engineering and modeling approaches,” Cell, vol. 137, pp. 172–181, 2009.
[2] M. Bansal, G. D. Gatta, and D. di Bernardo, “Inference of gene regulatory networks and compound mode of action from time course gene expression profiles,” Bioinformatics, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 815–822, 2006.
[3] M. Hecker, S. Lambeck, S. Toepfer, E. van Someren, and R. Guthke, “Gene regulatory network inference: Data integration in dynamic models - a review,” BioSystems, pp. 86–103, 2009.
[4] D. Camacho and J. Collins, “Synthetic biology strikes gold,” Cell, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 24–26, 2009.
[5] T. S. Gardner, D. di Bernardo, D. Lorenz, and J. J. Collins, “Inferring genetic networks and identifying compound mode of action via expression profiling,” Science, pp. 102–105, 2003.
[6] A. Julius, M. Zavlanos, S. Boyd, and G. Pappas, “Inferring genetic networks and identifying compound mode of action via expression profiling,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1113–1122, 2011.
[7] ——, “Genetic network identification using convex programming,” Systems Biology, IET, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 155–166, 2009.
[8] L.-Z. Liu, F.-X. Wu, and W.-J. Zhang, “A group LASSO-based method for robustly inferring gene regulatory networks from multiple time-course datasets,” BMC Systems Biology, vol. 8, no. Supl 3: S1, pp. 1–12, 2014.