Effects of Initial State on Opinion Formation in Complex Social Networks with Noises

Authors: Yi Yu, Vu Xuan Nguyen, Gaoxi Xiao

Abstract:

Opinion formation in complex social networks may exhibit complex system dynamics even when based on some simplest system evolution models. An interesting and important issue is the effects of the initial state on the final steady-state opinion distribution. By carrying out extensive simulations and providing necessary discussions, we show that, while different initial opinion distributions certainly make differences to opinion evolution in social systems without noises, in systems with noises, given enough time, different initial states basically do not contribute to making any significant differences in the final steady state. Instead, it is the basal distribution of the preferred opinions that contributes to deciding the final state of the systems. We briefly explain the reasons leading to the observed conclusions. Such an observation contradicts with a long-term belief on the roles of system initial state in opinion formation, demonstrating the dominating role that opinion mutation can play in opinion formation given enough time. The observation may help to better understand certain observations of opinion evolution dynamics in real-life social networks.

Keywords: Opinion formation, Deffuant model, opinion mutation, consensus making.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1474946

References:

[1] A. Pluchino, V. Latora, and A. Rapisarda, “Compromise and synchronization in opinion dynamics,” Eur. Phys. J. B, vol. 50, no. 1–2, pp. 169–176, Mar. 2006.
[2] K. Sznajd-Weron and J. Sznajd, “Opinion evolution in closed community,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. C, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1157–1165, 2000.
[3] C. Castellano, S. Fortunato, and V. Loreto, “Statistical physics of social dynamics,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 591–646, May 2009.
[4] Noah E. Friedkin, Anton V. Proskurnikov, Roberto Tempo, and Sergey E. Parsegov, “Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints,” Phys. Rev. Lett. Phys. Rev. B Phys. Rev. Lett. Nat. Phys. Nat. Phys. Phys. Rev. Lett. Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 112, no. 109, pp. 41301–256802, 1994.
[5] C. Castellano, D. Vilone, and A. Vespignani, “Incomplete ordering of the voter model on small-world networks,” EPL (Europhysics Lett., vol. 63, no. 1, p. 153, 2003.
[6] V. Sood and S. Redner, “Voter model on heterogeneous graphs,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 94, no. 17, p. 178701, 2005.
[7] S. Galam, “Minority opinion spreading in random geometry,” Eur. Phys. J. B-Condensed Matter Complex Syst., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 403–406, 2002.
[8] G. Deffuant, D. Neau, and F. Amblard, “Mixing beliefs among interacting agents,” Adv. Complex, 2000.
[9] G. Deffuant, “Comparing Extremism Propagation Patterns in Continuous Opinion Models,” J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., vol. 9, no. 3, p. 8, 2006.
[10] B. Kozma and A. Barrat, “Consensus formation on adaptive networks,” Phys. Rev. E - Stat. Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys., vol. 77, no. 1, 2008.
[11] J.-D. Mathias, S. Huet, and G. Deffuant, “Bounded Confidence Model with Fixed Uncertainties and Extremists: The Opinions Can Keep Fluctuating Indefinitely,” J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 6, 2016.
[12] M. Pineda, R. Toral, and E. Hernandez-Garcia, “Noisy continuous-opinion dynamics,” J. Stat. Mech. (2009), p08001.
[13] A. Carro, R. Toral, and M. S. Miguel, “The role of noise and initial conditions in the asymptotic solution of a bounded confidence, continuous-opinion model,” J. Stat. Phys., vol. 151, no. 1-2, pp. 131-149, Apr. 2013.
[14] Y Yu and G. Xiao, "Influence of Random Opinion Change in Complex Networks," Proc. IEEE DSP'2015, July 2015.
[15] Y. Yu and G. Xiao, "Preliminary study on bit-string modeling of opinion formation in complex networks, " Proc. HUSO'2015, Oct. 2015.
[16] Y. Yu, G. Xiao, G. Li, W. P. Tay, and H. F. Teoh, “Opinion Diversity and Community Formation in Adaptive Networks,” Chaos, vol. 27, no. 10, 10315, Oct. 2017.