The Use of Software and Internet Search Engines to Develop the Encoding and Decoding Skills of a Dyslexic Learner: A Case Study

Authors: Rabih Joseph Nabhan

Abstract:

This case study explores the impact of two major computer software programs Learn to Speak English and Learn English Spelling and Pronunciation, and some Internet search engines such as Google on mending the decoding and spelling deficiency of Simon X, a dyslexic student. The improvement in decoding and spelling may result in better reading comprehension and composition writing. Some computer programs and Internet materials can help regain the missing awareness and consequently restore his self-confidence and self-esteem. In addition, this study provides a systematic plan comprising a set of activities (four computer programs and Internet materials) which address the problem from the lowest to the highest levels of phoneme and phonological awareness. Four methods of data collection (accounts, observations, published tests, and interviews) create the triangulation to validly and reliably collect data before the plan, during the plan, and after the plan. The data collected are analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Sometimes the analysis is either quantitative or qualitative, and some other times a combination of both. Tables and figures are utilized to provide a clear and uncomplicated illustration of some data. The improvement in the decoding, spelling, reading comprehension, and composition writing skills that occurred is proved through the use of authentic materials performed by the student under study. Such materials are a comparison between two sample passages written by the learner before and after the plan, a genuine computer chat conversation, and the scores of the academic year that followed the execution of the plan. Based on these results, the researcher recommends further studies on other Lebanese dyslexic learners using the computer to mend their language problem in order to design and make a most reliable software program that can address this disability more efficiently and successfully.

Keywords: Analysis, awareness, dyslexic, software.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1474805

References:

[1] Basic facts about dyslexia: What every layperson ought to know - Copyright 1993, 2nd ed. 1998. The International Dyslexia Association, Baltimore, MD.
[2] Ehri, L. C. (1998). Word reading by sight and analogy in beginning readers. In Ch. Hulme, R. M. Joshi, and L. Erlbaum (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 87-111). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[3] Bruck, M. (1998). Outcomes of adults with childhood histories of dyslexia. In Ch. Hulme, R. M. Joshi, and L. Erlbaum (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 179-200). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[4] Cox, M. J. (1999). Motivating pupils through the use of ICT. In M. Leask and N. Pachler (Eds.), Learning to teach using ICT in the secondary school (pp. 19-35). London and New York: Routledge.
[5] Wadlington, E., & Wadlington, P. (2005). What educators really believe about dyslexia. Reading Improvement, 42, http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5009164018.
[6] Osmond, J. (1993). The reality of dyslexia. London and New York: Cassell.
[7] Filipek, P. A. & Kennedy, D. N. (1991). Magnetic resonance imaging: Its role in the developmental disorders. In (20) D.D. Duane and D.B. Gray (Eds.), The reading brain: The biological basis of dyslexia (pp.133-160). Parkton, Maryland: York Press.
[8] Snowling, M., Goulandris, N. & DEfty, N. (1998). Development and variation in developmental dyslexia. In Ch. Hulme, R. M. Joshi, and L. Erlbaum (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 201-217). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[9] Muter, V. (1998). Phonological awareness: its nature and its influence over early literacy. In Ch. Hulme, R. M. Joshi, and L. Erlbaum (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 113-125). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[10] Morais, J., Mousty, Ph. &Kolinsky, R. (1998). Why and how phoneme awareness helps learning to read. In Ch. Hulme, R. M. Joshi, and L. Erlbaum (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 127-152). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[11] Chard, D., J. & Dickson, S., V. (1999). Phonological awareness: Instructional and assessment guidelines. Retrieved July 23, 2007, from LD Online Web site: http://www.ldonline.org/article/6254
[12] Wise, B. W. & Olson, R. K. (1998). Studies of computer-aided remediation for reading disabilities. In Ch. Hulme, R. M. Joshi, and L. Erlbaum (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 473-487). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[13] Gough, B. & Wren, S (1998). The decomposition of decoding. In Ch. Hulme, R. M. Joshi, and L. Erlbaum (Eds.), Reading and spelling: Development and disorders (pp. 19-32). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[14] Katz, L. (2001). If I only had a brain. Dyslexia Discourse, 46, 13-19.
[15] Riddick, B. (1996). Living with dyslexia: The social and emotional consequences of specific learning difficulties. London and New York: Routledge.
[16] Wadlington, E., Jacob, Sh. & Bailey, S. (1996). Teaching students with dyslexia in the regular classroom. Childhood Education, 73, http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5002280872.
[17] Selfe, C. L. (1999). Technology and literacy in the twenty-first century. United States of America: Southern Illinois University press.
[18] Ariew, R., & Frommer G. (1987). Interaction in the computer age. In W. M. Rivers (Ed.), Interactive language teaching (177-193). Cambridge University Press.
[19] Costanzo, W. (1994). Reading, writing and thinking in the age of electronic literacy. In S. L. Selfe and S. Hilligos (Eds.), Literacy and computers; the complications of teaching and learning with technology (pp. 11-21). New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
[20] Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[21] Kenning, M. J. & Kenning M-M. (1983). An introduction to computer assisted language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[22] Kern, R. & Warschauer. M. (2000). Introduction theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer and R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 1-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[23] Cox, M. J. (1997). The effects of information technology on students’ motivation. Final report. Conventry: NCET/London: King’s College.
[24] Collings, N., Englert, C. S., Romig, N., & Zhao, Y. (2005). Learning to read words: The effects of Internet-based software on the improvement of reading performance. Remedial and Special Education, 26, http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5012048737.
[25] Evanciew, E. P. Ch. (2003). Preparing technology education teachers to work with special needs students; technology education programs typically rely on active, hands-on learning in order to provide students “real-world” experiences. The Technology Teacher, 62, http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5002529739.
[26] Hall, T. E, Hughes, Ch. A., & Filbert, M. (2000). Computer assisted instruction in reading for students with learning disabilities: A research synthesis. Education & Treatment of Children, 23, http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5001815270.
[27] Torgensen, J. K. (1986). Computers and cognition in reading: A focus on decoding fluency. Exceptional Children, 53,157-162.
[28] Franklin, G. & Litchfield, D. (1999). Special educational needs and ICT. In M. Leask and N. Pachler (Eds.), Learning to teach using ICT in the secondary school (pp. 109-124). London and New York: Routledge.
[29] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
[30] Orum, A. M., Feagin, J. R., & Sjoberg, G. (1991). Introduction. In J.R. Feagin, A.M. Orum, and G. Sjoberg (Eds.), A case for the case study (pp. 1-26). Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.
[31] Wisker, G. (2001). The postgraduate research handbooks. Great Britain: Palgrave.
[32] Hitchcock, G. & Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the teacher. London: Routledge.
[33] Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. London and New York: Continuum.
[34] Gay, L. R. (1996). Educational research: competencies for analysis and application. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[35] McDonough, J. & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. Great Britain: Arnold.
[36] Konishi, Ch. (2007). Learning English as a second language: A case study of a Chinese girl in an American preschool. Childhood Education, 83 (5), 267-273.
[37] Houghton, D. (1991). Mr. Chong: case study of a dependent learner of English for academic purposes. System, 19 (1-2), 75-90.
[38] Antonsen, E. A. (1988). Treatment of a boy of twelve: help with handwriting, play therapy and discussion of problems. Journal of Education Therapy, 2 (1), 2-32.
[39] Scholz, R. W., & Tietje, O. (2002). Embedded case study methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
[40] Lewis, J. & Ritchie, J. (2003). Generalising from qualitative research. In J. Ritchie and J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 263-286). Great Britain: Sage Publications.
[41] Balram, Sh. (2003). Sholz, Ronald W., and Olaf Tietje. Embedded case study methods: Integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 12, http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5006229422.
[42] Ritchie, J. (2003). The applications of qualitative methods to social research. In J. Ritchie and J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 24-46). Great Britain: Sage Publications.