Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32722
Innovating and Disrupting Higher Education: The Evolution of Massive Open Online Courses

Authors: Nabil Sultan


A great deal has been written on Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) since 2012 (considered by some as the year of the MOOCs). The emergence of MOOCs caused a great deal of interest amongst academics and technology experts as well as ordinary people. Some of the authors who wrote on MOOCs perceived it as the next big thing that will disrupt education. Other authors saw it as another fad that will go away once it ran its course (as most fads often do). But MOOCs did not turn out to be a fad and it is still around. Most importantly, they evolved into something that is beginning to look like a viable business model. This paper explores this phenomenon within the theoretical frameworks of disruptive innovations and jobs to be done as developed by Clayton Christensen and his colleagues and its implications for the future of higher education (HE).

Keywords: MOOCs, disruptive innovations, higher education, jobs theory.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 687


[1] J. McGregor, “Clayton Christensen's innovation brain. Business Week”, June 2007;
[2] Fini, “The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools”, November 2009;
[3] Anders (2015, November). Theories and Applications of Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs): The Case for Hybrid Design”, International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16 (6), (Online).
[4] J. Kennedy, “Characteristics of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): A Research Review, 2009-2012”, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, Vol. 13 (1). pp. 1-16, 2014.
[5] Milligan, A. Littlejohn and A. Margaryan, (2013, June). Patterns of Engagement in Connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9 (2). pp. 149–159 (Online). Available:
[6] M. Christensen, The innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
[7] B. Melville, The Big Book of Senior Moments, Skyhorse Publishing, 2015.
[8] M. Raynor, “Of waves and ripples: Disruption theory’s newest critic tries to make a splash”, July 2014;
[9] M, Christensen, T. Hall, K. Dillon and D. S. Duncan, Competing Against Luck: The Theiry of Innovation and Customer Choice, New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2016.
[10] M. Christensen, M. B Horn and C. W. Johnson, Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns, 2nd Edition, McGraw Hill, 2010.
[11] K. Clark, “Online Education Offers Access and Affordability”, April 2009,
[12] L. Bridgestock, “How Much Does it Cost to Study in the US?”, December 2012;
[13] M. B. Horn and C. M. Christensen, “Beyond the Buzz, Where Are MOOCs Really Going?”, February 2013;
[14] S. Murray, “Why Employers From Google To Goldman Sachs Are Warming To MOOCs”, February 2016;
[15] Dillow, “Want a high-paying job? Get a 'nanodegree'”, February 2016;
[16] M. R. Weise, “MOOCs ain’t over”, January 2014;
[17] C. M, Christensen and M. R. Weise, “MOOCs’ disruption is only beginning”; May 2014;
[18] M. B. Horn, “The audacity of Udacity”, December 2013;
[19] Watters, “A Future with Only 10 Universities (Minding the Future, #OpenVA)”, October 2013;
[20] R. Y. Bayeck, “Exploratory study of MOOC learners’ demographics and motivation: The case of students involved in groups”. Open Praxis, Vol. 8 (3), 2016, pp. 223 – 233.
[21] C. Shirky, “Napster, Udacity, and the Academy”; November 2012;