Spectral Mixture Model Applied to Cannabis Parcel Determination
Many research projects require accurate delineation of the different land cover type of the agricultural area. Especially it is critically important for the definition of specific plants like cannabis. However, the complexity of vegetation stands structure, abundant vegetation species, and the smooth transition between different seconder section stages make vegetation classification difficult when using traditional approaches such as the maximum likelihood classifier. Most of the time, classification distinguishes only between trees/annual or grain. It has been difficult to accurately determine the cannabis mixed with other plants. In this paper, a mixed distribution models approach is applied to classify pure and mix cannabis parcels using Worldview-2 imagery in the Lakes region of Turkey. Five different land use types (i.e. sunflower, maize, bare soil, and cannabis) were identified in the image. A constrained Gaussian mixture discriminant analysis (GMDA) was used to unmix the image. In the study, 255 reflectance ratios derived from spectral signatures of seven bands (Blue-Green-Yellow-Red-Rededge-NIR1-NIR2) were randomly arranged as 80% for training and 20% for test data. Gaussian mixed distribution model approach is proved to be an effective and convenient way to combine very high spatial resolution imagery for distinguishing cannabis vegetation. Based on the overall accuracies of the classification, the Gaussian mixed distribution model was found to be very successful to achieve image classification tasks. This approach is sensitive to capture the illegal cannabis planting areas in the large plain. This approach can also be used for monitoring and determination with spectral reflections in illegal cannabis planting areas.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1474555Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 384
 J. R. Anderson, E. E. Hardy, J. T. Roach, and R. E.Witmer, 1976. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remotely sensed data, U.S. Geol. Survey, Professional Paper 964, Reston, VA, 1976.
 EMCDDA, 2011. Europan Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction. National Report.
 United National Office on Drugs and Crime. 2009. World Drugs Report 2009. Vi- enna. url: https://www.unodc.org/ documents/wdr/WDR_2009/WDR2009_eng_ web.pdf.
 L. Basayigit S. Demir B. Kara and Y. Ucar, 2017. Monitoring Cannabis Cultivation with High-Resolution Images. ICGRS 2017: 19th International Conference on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Rome Italy Sep 18-19, 2017, 19 (9) Part XI.
 C. Heinz Daniel, 2011. Fully Constrained Least Squares Linear Spectral Mixture Analysis Method for Material Quantification in Hyperspectral Imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. 39, No. 3.
 H. M. Horwitz, R. F. Nalepka, P. D. Hyde, and J. P. Morganstern, 1971. “Estimating the proportion of objects within a single resolution element of a multispectral scanner,” Tech. Rep. NASA Contract NAS-9-9784, Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
 F. J. Garcia-Haro, M. A. Gilabert, and J. Melia, 1996. “Linear spectral mixture modelling to estimate vegetation amount from optical spectral data,” Int. J. Remote Sensing, vol. 17, no. 17, pp. 3373–3400, 1996.
 J. J. Settle and N. A. Drake, 1993. Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions, Int. J. Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1159–1177, 1993.
 E. J. van Koowijk, H. van der Voet, and J. J. M. Berdowski, 1995. Estimation of ground cover composition per pixel after matching image and ground data with subpixel accuracy, Int. J. Remote Sensing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 97–111, 1995.
 J. Junchang Eric D Kolaczykb. Sucharita G. 2003. Gaussian mixture discriminant analysis and sub-pixel land cover characterization in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 84, 550–560.
 J. A. Richards and J. Xiuping, 1999. Remote sensing digital image analysis. Springer.
 Digital Globe, 2013. Digitalglobe Constellation Worldview-2. WorldView-2 spacecraft information and specifications. www.digitalglobe.com.
 ESRI, 2010. ArcMap 9.3 Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Resource Institute.
 T. Hastie and R. Tibshirani, 1996. Discriminant analysis by Gaussian mixtures, J. R. Stat. Soc. 58, pp. 155–176.
 N. Çalış and H.Erol, 2012. A new per-field classification method using mixture discriminant analysis, Journal of Applied Statistics Vol. 39, No. 10, October 2012, 2129–2140.
 S. Deng, X. Yifei, L. Xiaoli, He. Yong, 2015. An infinite Gaussian mixture model with its application in hyperspectral unmixing, Expert Systems with Applications 42 (2015) 1987–1997.
 Reynolds D, 2015. Gaussian mixture models. Encyclopedia of biometrics, 827-832.
 Fraley and Raftery (2002) Fraley, C., & Raftery, A. E. (2002). Model based clustering, discriminant analysis and density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 611 – 631.
 Schwartz, G., 1979. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6, 461–464.
 Kass, R. E., Raftery, A. E., 1995. Bayes factors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90, 773–795.
 Halbe Z, and Aladjem M, 2007. Regularized mixture discriminant analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters 28 (2007) 2104–2115.