Harmonizing Spatial Plans: A Methodology to Integrate Sustainable Mobility and Energy Plans to Promote Resilient City Planning
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33092
Harmonizing Spatial Plans: A Methodology to Integrate Sustainable Mobility and Energy Plans to Promote Resilient City Planning

Authors: B. Sanchez, D. Zambrana-Vasquez, J. Fresner, C. Krenn, F. Morea, L. Mercatelli

Abstract:

Local administrations are facing established targets on sustainable development from different disciplines at the heart of different city departments. Nevertheless, some of these targets, such as CO2 reduction, relate to two or more disciplines, as it is the case of sustainable mobility and energy plans (SUMP & SECAP/SEAP). This opens up the possibility to efficiently cooperate among different city departments and to create and develop harmonized spatial plans by using available resources and together achieving more ambitious goals in cities. The steps of the harmonization processes developed result in the identification of areas to achieve common strategic objectives. Harmonization, in other words, helps different departments in local authorities to work together and optimize the use or resources by sharing the same vision, involving key stakeholders, and promoting common data assessment to better optimize the resources. A methodology to promote resilient city planning via the harmonization of sustainable mobility and energy plans is presented in this paper. In order to validate the proposed methodology, a representative city engaged in an innovation process in efficient spatial planning is used as a case study. The harmonization process of sustainable mobility and energy plans covers identifying matching targets between different fields, developing different spatial plans with dual benefit and common indicators guaranteeing the continuous improvement of the harmonized plans. The proposed methodology supports local administrations in consistent spatial planning, considering both energy efficiency and sustainable mobility. Thus, municipalities can use their human and economic resources efficiently. This guarantees an efficient upgrade of land use plans integrating energy and mobility aspects in order to achieve sustainability targets, as well as to improve the wellbeing of its citizens.

Keywords: Harmonized planning, spatial planning, sustainable energy, sustainable mobility, SECAP, SUMP.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1474409

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 778

References:


[1] Quick Reference Guide Monitoring SECAP implementation. Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy
[2] Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Action Plan on Urban Mobility {SEC(2009) 1211} {SEC(2009) 1212} /* COM/2009/0490 final */
[3] WHITE PAPER Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system/* COM/2011/0144 final */
[4] Action Plan on Urban Mobility – State of Play. European Commission Directorate-General For Mobility And Transport. Brussels, February 2012.
[5] Giulia Melica, Paolo Bertoldi, Albana Kona, Andreea Iancu, Silvia Rivas, Paolo Zancanella. Multilevel governance of sustainable energy policies: The role of regions and provinces to support the participation of small local authorities in the Covenant of Mayors. Sustainable Cities and Society Volume 39, May 2018, Pages 729-739.
[6] Anthony D. May. Encouraging good practice in the development of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans. Case Studies on Transport Policy.
[7] Fresner J., Krenn C., Morea F., Mercatelli L., Alessandrini S., (2017). Guidelines for the harmonization of energy and mobility planning. (STENUM GmbH, Austria, AREA Science Park, Italy).
[8] Online Observatory of the H2020 SIMPLA project (http://www.simpla-project.eu/en/guidelines/).
[9] Eurico Vasco Amorim. Sustainable energy action plans: project management intercomparison. - Procedia Technology 16 ( 2014 ) 1183 – 1189
[10] Johansen, A., Eik-Andresen, P., & Ekambaram, A., 2014. Stakeholder Benefit Assessment – Project Success through Management of Stakeholders. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119 (1877), pp581–590.
[11] Oliver-Solà, J., Armero, M., de Foix, B. M., & Rieradevall, J. , 2013. Energy and environmental evaluation of municipal facilities: Case study in the province of Barcelona. Energy Policy, 61, pp920-930.