Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30840
Understanding Workplace Behavior through Organizational Culture and Complex Adaptive Systems Theory

Authors: Péter Restás, Andrea Czibor, Zsolt Péter Szabó


Purpose: This article aims to rethink the phenomena of employee behavior as a product of a system. Both organizational culture and Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) theory emphasize that individual behavior depends on the specific system and the unique organizational culture. These two major theories are both represented in the field of organizational studies; however, they are rarely used together for the comprehensive understanding of workplace behavior. Methodology: By reviewing the literature we use key concepts stemming from organizational culture and CAS theory in order to show the similarities between these theories and create an enriched understanding of employee behavior. Findings: a) Workplace behavior is defined here as social cognition issue. b) Organizations are discussed here as complex systems, and cultures which drive and dictate the cognitive processes of agents in the system. c) Culture gives CAS theory a context which lets us see organizations not just as ever-changing and unpredictable, but as such systems that aim to create and maintain stability by recurring behavior. Conclusion: Applying the knowledge from culture and CAS theory sheds light on our present understanding of employee behavior, also emphasizes the importance of novel ways in organizational research and management.

Keywords: Stability, Organizational Culture, complex adaptive systems theory, employee behavior

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 664


[1] Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006). Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of complexity theory for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 351-365.
[2] Schein, E. H. (2006). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 356). John Wiley & Sons.
[3] Morgan, G., Gregory, F., & Roach, C. (1997). Images of organization.
[4] Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding Organizational Culture.
[5] Anderson, P. (1999). Perspective: Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216-232.
[6] Seel, R. (2003). Emergence in organisations. Retrieved November, 29, 2006.
[7] Stacey, R. D., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management: fad or radical challenge to systems thinking?. Psychology Press.
[8] Dooley, K. J. (1997). A complex adaptive systems model of organizational change. Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences, 1(1), 69-97.
[9] Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations. Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. The software of the mind. London: Mc Graw-Hill.
[10] Sinha, J. B. (2009). Culture and organizational behavior. SAGE Publications India.
[11] Harris, S. G. (1994). Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema-based perspective. Organization Science, 5(3), 309-321.
[12] Tenkasi, R. V., & Boland, R. J. (1993). Locating meaning-making in organizational learning: The narrative basis of cognition. Research in organizational change and development, 7, 77-103.
[13] Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. Sage.
[14] Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. CUP Archive.
[15] Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society (Vol. 111). University of Chicago Press.: Chicago.
[16] Ackerman, J. M., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2012). Evolutionary perspectives on social cognition. The handbook of social cognition, 451-473.
[17] Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative science quarterly, 339-358.
[18] Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567-582.
[19] Kunda, G. (2009). Engineering Culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Temple University Press.
[20] Anthony Giddens. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Univ of California Press.
[21] Schabracq, M. J. (2003). Organisational culture, stress, and change. The handbook of work and health psychology, 37.
[22] Mihata, K. (1997). The persistence of emergence. Chaos, Complexity & Sociology: Myths, Models & Theories, 30-38.
[23] Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard business review, 85(11), 68.
[24] Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). A Stupidity‐Based theory of organizations. Journal of management studies, 49(7), 1194-1220.
[25] Tsoukas, H., & Hatch, M. J. (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human relations, 54(8), 979-1013.
[26] Casti, J. L. (1986). On system complexity: Identification, measurement, and management. In Complexity, language, and life: Mathematical approaches (pp. 146-173). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
[27] Martin, J., Feldman, M. S., Hatch, M. J., & Sitkin, S. B. (1983). The uniqueness paradox in organizational stories. Administrative Science Quarterly, 438-453.
[28] Boje, D. M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational & communication research. Sage.