The Problem of Reconciling the Principle of Confidentiality in Foreign Investment Arbitration with the Public Interest

Authors: Bárbara Magalhães Bravo, Cláudia Figueiras

Abstract:

The economical globalization through the liberalization of the markets and capitals boosted the economical development of the nations and the needs for sorting out the disputes arising from the foreign investment. The arbitration, for all the inherent advantages, such as swiftness, arbitrators’ specialise skills and impartiality sets a pacifier tool for the interest in account. Safeguarded the public interest, we face the problem of the confidentiality in the arbitration. The urgent development of impelling mechanisms concerning transparency, guaranty and protection of the interest in account, reveals itself urgent. Through a bibliography review, we will dense the state of art, by going through the several solutions concerning, and pointing out the most suitable. Through the jurisprudential analysis we will point out the solution for the conflict confidentiality/public interest. The transparency, inextricable from the public interest, imposes the arbitration process can be open to all citizens. Transparency rules have been considered at the UNCITRAL in attempting to conciliate the necessity of publicity and the public interest, however still insufficient. The arbitration of foreign investment carries consequences to the citizens of the State. Articulating mechanisms between the arbitral procedures secrecy and the public interest should be adopted. The arbitration of foreign investment, being a tertius genius between the international arbitration and the administrative arbitration would claim its own regulation in each and every States where the confidentiality rules and its exceptions could be identified. One should enquiry where the limit of the citizens’ individual rights protection and the public interest should give way to the principle of transparency

Keywords: Arbitration, foreign investment, transparency, confidentiality, international centre for settlement of investment disputes UNCITRAL.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1340581

References:

[1] Antunes, Luis Filipe Colaço, “Mito e Realidade da Transparência Administrativa”, Estudos em Homenagem ao Professor Doutor Afonso Rodrigues Queiró, vol. II, Boletim da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, 1993, p.9.
[2] Correia, Sérvulo, A resolução de litígios sobre investimento estrangeiro no direito arbitral comparado, Separata de Estudos em Homenagem ao Prof. Doutor Martim de Albuquerque, Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa, Coimbra, Coimbra editora, 2010, p. 826.
[3] DolzeR, Rudolf, SCHEURER, Cristoph, Principles of International Investment Law, Oxford, 2012, p.85.
[4] Duarte, Tiago, “Arbitragem ICSID e Desenvolvimento Económico dos Estados”, Estudos em Homenagem ao Prof. Doutor José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho, Coimbra, Coimbra Editora, 2012, p.273.
[5] Duarte, Tiago, “O Consentimento nas arbitragens internacionais (ICSID)”, separata de Estudos em Homenagem ao Prof. Doutor Sérvulo Correia, Coimbra, Coimbra Editora, 2010, p.546.
[6] Duarte, Tiago, As fronteiras do Direito Público e a Arbitragem Internacional de Protecção de Investimentos, Scientia Iuridica, Tomo LX, 2011.
[7] Dugan Christopher F, Investor- State, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011, p. 710.
[8] Gaillard Emannuel, “Identify or Define? Reflections on the Evolution of the Concept of Investment in IID Practice”, Essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer, P. 403.
[9] Gonçalves, Pedro Costa, Notificação dos Actos Administrativos (Notas sobre a Génese, âmbito, Sentido e Consequências de uma Imposição Constitucional, in AB VNO AD OMNES — 75 Anos da Coimbra Editora, Coimbra, Coimbra Editora, 1998, p.1091.
[10] Johnson Lise, et al, “New UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules on Transparency: application, contente, and next steps”, ICSID, Vale Columbis Center, 2013.
[11] http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2014/04/UNCITRAL_Rules_on_Transparency_commentary_FINAL.pdf.
[12] Kant Immanuel, “Da harmonia da Política com a Moral Segundo o Conceito Transcendental no Direito Público” (Apêndice II), in A Paz Perpétua — um Projecto Filosófico, trad. Artur Morão, Covilhã, Universidade da Beira Interior, 2008: [13] Sabater, Aníbal, Towards Transparency in arbitration (A cautious approach): http:bjil.typepad.com/sabater_final.pdf, p.5.
[14] Schlee, Paula,” Transparência em Arbitragens Internacionais Investidor – Estado”, Revista Secr. Perm., Año 3, nº5, março 2015, p.101.
[15] Scheurer Crhristoph, Commentary on the ICSID Convention, ICSID Review, vol 11, 1996, p. P.372.
[16] Sornarajah M., the International Law on Foreign Investment, Cambridge, 2010, p.299.
[17] Van Harten Gus, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007, p.73.