Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32731
Reduction in Population Growth under Various Contraceptive Strategies in Uttar Pradesh, India

Authors: Prashant Verma, K. K. Singh, Anjali Singh, Ujjaval Srivastava


Contraceptive policies have been derived to achieve desired reductions in the growth rate and also, applied to the data of Uttar-Pradesh, India for illustration. Using the Lotka’s integral equation for the stable population, expressions for the proportion of contraceptive users at different ages have been obtained. At the age of 20 years, 42% of contraceptive users is imperative to reduce the present annual growth rate of 0.036 to 0.02, assuming that 40% of the contraceptive users discontinue at the age of 25 years and 30% again continue contraceptive use at age 30 years. Further, presuming that 75% of women start using contraceptives at the age of 23 years, and 50% of the remaining women start using contraceptives at the age of 28 years, while the rest of them start using it at the age of 32 years. If we set a minimum age of marriage as 20 years, a reduction of 0.019 in growth rate will be obtained. This study describes how the level of contraceptive use at different age groups of women reduces the growth rate in the state of Uttar Pradesh. The article also promotes delayed marriage in the region.

Keywords: Child bearing, contraceptive devices, contraceptive policies, population growth, stable population.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI):

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 599


[1] Kulkarni, P., &Alagarajan, M. (2005). “PopulationGrowth, Fertility, andReligioninIndia." EconomicandPoliticalWeekly, 40(5), 403-410.
[2] National Population Policy (2000), India.
[3] Statistical reports, published by “Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India”.
[4] Elder, R. (1974). “Targets Versus Extension Education: The Family Planning Programme in Uttar Pradesh, India." Population Studies, 28(2), 249-261.
[5] Stephenson, R., Koenig, M., & Ahmed, S. (2006). “Domestic Violence and Contraceptive Adoption in UttarPradesh, India." Studies in Family Planning, 37(2), 75-86.
[6] Das, M, & Mohanty, S.K. (2012). “Spatial pattern of fertility transition in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar: A district level analysis." Genus, 68(2), 81-106.
[7] Srinivasan K. (1977). “Impact in Measuring the Impact of FamilyPlanning, A Short Guide." Development Centre of the Organisation for Economic: Cooperation and Development, Paras, Pp. 41-73.
[8] Potter, R.G. & Parker, M.P. (1964). Population Studies(London), 18, 99.
[9] Singh, S.N. (1964). Sankhya, B26, 95.
[10] Keyfitz, N. (1971). “Migration as a means of population control”, Population Studies, Vol. 25, Iss. 1.
[11] Keyfitz, N. (1975). “Reproductive value: with applications to migration, contraception, and zero population growth”, Quantitative Sociology, (SanFrancisco, London: AcademicPress, P 587, eBook - ISBN: 978148328818).
[12] Singh, S.N., &Yadava, K.N.S. (1979). “Reduction in Population Growth Under Different Contraceptive Policies”, Journal of Biosciences, 1(2), 215-222.
[13] Coale AJ & Demeny P (1966). “Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Population”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
[14] National Family Health Servey-3, India (2005-06).
[15] Coale AJ (1972). “The Growth and Structure of Human Population”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
[16] Agarwal, B. L. (2003). “Programmed Statistics”, Book: New Age International P. Ltd, Publishers. ISBN: 81-224-1458-3.