Commenced in January 2007
Paper Count: 30836
Projectification: Using Project Management Methodology to Manage the Academic Program Review
Abstract:While research is rich with what criteria could be included in the academic program review processes, there is rarely any mention of how this significant and complex process should be managed. This paper proposes using project management methodology in alignment with the program review criteria of the Dickeson’s Prioritizing Academic Programs model. Project management and academic program review share two distinct characteristics; one is their life cycle, and the second is the core knowledge areas they use. This aligned and structured approach offers academic administrators a step-by-step guide that can help them manage this process and effectively assess academic programs.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1340546Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 389
 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). http://www.abet.org. Retrieved on 23 April, 2017.
 Ahiaga-Dagbui, D, Love, P, Smith, S., and Ackermann, F. (2017) Toward a Systemic View to Cost Overrun Causation in Infrastructure Projects: A Review and Implications for Research. Project Management Journal, May, 2017.
 Alliger, G. M., Janak, E. A. “Kirkpatrick’s Levels of Training Criteria: Thirty Years Later,” Personnel Psychology, 42 (2), 1989. 331–342; Wick, C. W., Pollock, R. V. H., Jefferson, A. K., Flanagan, R. D. The Six Disciplines of Breakthrough Learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2006.
 Anderson, S. B., & Ball, S. The profession and practice of program evaluation. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1978.
 Barak, R. (1982). Program Review in Higher Education: Within and Without. National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
 Barak, R. J. & Breier, B.E. (1990). Successful program review: A practical guide to evaluating programs in academic settings. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Barak, R. J. & Sweeney, J. D. (1995).
 Brady, T., & Davies, A. (2004). Building project capabilities: From exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1601–1621.
 Chroneer, D., and Backlund, F. (2015). A Holistic View on Learning in Project-Based Organizations. Project Management Journal. July, 2015.
 Collins, J. (2001). Good to great: Why some companies make the leap and others don’t. New York, NY: Collins Business
 The Commission for Academic Accreditation (CAA). http://www.caa.ae. Retrieved on 15 March, 2017.
 The Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs (ACBSP). http://www.acbsp.org/ Retrieved on 23 April, 2017.
 Comstock, J. and Booker, C. “Self-Study Leveraging: The QPC Model for Comprehensive Academic Program Review,” p. 1. A Collection of Papers on Self-Study and Institutional Improvement, Volume 1, Chapter 4, 2009.
 Creamer, D. G. & Janosik, S. M. (1999). Academic program approval and review practices in the United States and Selected foreign countries. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(23).
[Also available online] Web-site: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n23/.
 Dickeson, Robert. Prioritizing Academic Programs and Services: Reallocating Resources to Achieve Strategic Balance. Revised & Updated. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
 Dressel, P. L. Handbook of academic evaluation. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1976.
 Frye, Randy L. (1997). Academic program reviews in collegiate business education: How do they contribute to continuous improvement? Ed.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
 Glenn, D. and Schimdt, P. “Disappearing Disciplines: Degree Programs Fight for Their Lives.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, March 28, 2010, http://chronicle.com/article/Disappearing-Disciplines-/64850/
 Koskinen, K. U. (2012). Organizational learning in project-based companies: A process thinking approach. Project Management Journal, 43(3), 40–49.
 The Hanover Research Council (HRC) (2009). “Models Used to Determine Academic Program Costs and Viability”. Retrieved on December 4, 2016 from http://www.planning.salford.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/20765/Models-Used-to-Determine-Academic-Program-Costs-and-Viability-Membership.pdf. Retrieved on 23 April, 2017.
 Hoey, J. (1995). Organizational factors in program review. New Directions for Institutional Research No 86 summer.
 Ika, L. (2009). Project Success as a Topic in Project Management Journals. Project Management Journal. December, 2009.
 Kozak-Holland, M., (2011), The History of Project Management, Multi-Media Publications, Ontario.
 Lee, Moon-Hee. (1991). A comparative analysis of academic program review by state governing boards, state coordinating boards, and regional accrediting agencies in American higher education. Ed.D. dissertation, University of Virginia.
 Lundin, R. (2016). Project Society: Paths and Challenges. Project Management Journal. September, 2016.
 Majdalawieh, M. Marks, A. (2017). Assessing the effectiveness and viability of an Academic Program: a holistic Conceptual Framework. Lambert Academic Publishing: ISBN: 978-3-330-06152-1.
 Massy, W. F. Honoring the Trust: Quality and Cost Containment in Higher Education, p. 6. Figure contents quoted from source. Bolton MA: Anker Publishing, 2003.
 Mets, L. (1995). Program review in academic departments. New Directions for Institutional Research No 86 Summer.
 Mets, L. (1997). Planning change through program review. In M. Peterson, D. Dill, L. Mets & Associates (Eds.). Planning and management for a changing environment, pp. 340-359. San Fransico: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
 Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE). http://www.msche.org/ Retrieved on 15 March, 2017.
 Munns, A. K., & Bjeirmi, B. F. (1996). The role of project management in achieving project success. International Journal of Project Management, 14, 81–87.
 The National Association of Schools of Arts and Design (NASAD). http://nasad.arts-accredit.org/.
 Nieto-Rodriguez, A., Manager, A. S., Evrard, D., & Partner, A. (2004) Boosting business performance through programme and project management. London, England: PwC.
 Nokes, S. (2007). The Definitive Guide to Project Management. 2nd Ed.n. London (Financial Times / Prentice Hall): 2007. ISBN 978-0-273-71097-4.
 Olson, G. “Why Universities are Streamlining Their Curricula.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, Dec. 1, 2010. http://chronicle.com/article/article-content/125556/.
 Project Management Institute (PMI). http://www.pmi.org/ Retrieved on 23 April, 2017.
 Rosenzweig, P. The Halo Effect. New York: Free Press, 2007.
 Slimmer, Virginia McKinley, "Evaluating a program in higher education: a conceptual process and its application " (1981). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 6854. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/6854.
 Schwalbe, K. (2009). Introduction to Project Management. 2nd Edition. Boston: Cengage Learning.
 Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges (SACS). http://www.sacs.org/ Retrieved on 23 April, 2017.
 Turner, J. R., & Keegan, A. (2000). The management of operations in the project-based organisation. Journal of Change Management, 1(2), 131–148.
 University of Cincinnati (UOC) Self-Study, 2009: Report to the Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools.” http://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/hlcaccreditation/docs/self_study.pdf; Retrieved on 23 April, 2017.
 Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A., Peck, S., Fenton, E., & Conyon, M. (1999). Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: A European panel study, 1992–1996. Organization Science, 10(5), 583–600.
 Williams, T. (2003). Learning from projects. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(5), 443–451.
 Yeo, K. T. (1993). Systems thinking and project management: Time to reunite. International Journal of Project Management, 11(2), 111–117.
 Zinovieff, M. (2008). “Review and Analysis of Training Impact Evaluation Methods, and Proposed Measures to Support a United Nations System Fellowships Evaluation Framework,” prepared for the WHO’s Department of Human Resources for Health on behalf of the UN Task Force on Impact Assessment of Fellowships, July 2008. 23-4.