Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30127
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Use of Scharmer’s Theory-U Model in Action-Learning-Based Leadership Development Program

Authors: Donald C. Lantu, Henndy Ginting, M. Yorga Permana, Dany M. A. Ramdlany

Abstract:

We constructed a training program for top-talents of a Bank with Scharmer Theory-U as the model. In this training program, we implemented the action learning perspective, as it is claimed to be the most effective one currently available. In the process, participants were encouraged to be more involved, especially compared to traditional lecturing. The goal of this study is to assess the effectiveness of this particular training. The program consists of six days non-residential workshop within two months. Between each workshop, the participants were involved in the works of action learning group. They were challenged by dealing with the real problem related to their tasks at work. The participants of the program were 30 best talents who were chosen according to their yearly performance. Using paired difference statistical test in the behavioral assessment, we found that the training was not effective to increase participants’ leadership competencies. For the future development program, we suggested to modify the goals of the program toward the next stage of development.

Keywords: Action learning, behaviour, leadership development, Theory-U.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1317412

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 390

References:


[1] Clinton, J. R. (2017). The making of a leader: Recognizing the lessons and stages of leadership development. Two Words Publishing, LLC.
[2] Conger, J. (1988). Charismatic leadership. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[3] Campbell, C. R. (2007). On the journey toward wholeness in leader theories. Leadership & organization development journal, 28(2), 137-153.
[4] Hannah, S. T., & Avolio, B. J. (2011). The locus of leader character. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 979-983.
[5] Bandura, A. (1974). Behavior theory and the models of man. American psychologist, 29(12), 859.
[6] Dansereau, F. (1995). A dyadic approach to leadership: Creating and nurturing this approach under fire. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), 479-490.
[7] McGoldrick, T. B., Menschner, E. F., & Pollock, M. L. (2001). Nurturing the transformation from staff nurse to leader. Holistic nursing practice, 16(1), 16-20.
[8] Morrel-Samuels, P. (1998). U.S. Patent No. 5,795,155. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
[9] Camburn, E. M., Huff, J. T., Goldring, E. B., & May, H. (2010). Assessing the validity of an annual survey for measuring principal leadership practice. The Elementary School Journal, 111(2), 314-335.
[10] Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader—member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational behavior and human performance, 30(1), 109-131.
[11] Chiok Foong Loke, J. (2001). Leadership behaviours: effects on job satisfaction, productivity and organizational commitment. Journal of nursing management, 9(4), 191-204.
[12] Revans, R. W. (1982). The origins and growth of action learning. Studentlitteratur.
[13] Revans, R. (2017). ABC of action learning. Routledge.
[14] McGill, I., & Brockbank, A. (2003). Action learning handbook. Kogan Page.
[15] Pedler, M. (2010). Action learning for managers. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 24(2).
[16] Scharmer, C. O. (2007). Theory U: Leading from the emerging future. A Social Technology of Freedom (working title).
[17] Scharmer, C. O. (2009). Theory U: Learning from the future as it emerges. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
[18] Austin, P. C., & Brunner, L. J. (2003). Type I error inflation in the presence of a ceiling effect. The American Statistician, 57(2), 97-104.
[19] Aron, A., Coups, E., & Aron, E. N. (2013). Statistics for The Behavioral and Social Sciences: Pearson New International Edition: A Brief Course. Pearson Higher Ed.
[20] Graziano, A. M., & Raulin, M. L. (1993). Research methods: A process of inquiry. HarperCollins College Publishers.
[21] Ehlers, L. (2017). Regression Toward the Mean.
[22] Wicklund, R. A., & Duval, S. (1971). Opinion change and performance facilitation as a result of objective self-awareness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(3), 319-342.
[23] Higgs, M., & Rowland, D. (2010). Emperors with clothes on: The role of self-awareness in developing effective change leadership. Journal of Change Management, 10(4), 369-385.
[24] Kim, S. 2003. An examination of action learning as a method for developing transformational leadership behaviors and characteristics. Unpublished doctoral diss., George Washington University.
[25] Kim, U. 2003. An examination and key success factors of practical learning methods in businesses: Focusing on the case of company T. Unpublished master thesis. Yonsei University.
[26] Waddill, D.O. 2006. Action e-learning: An exploratory case study of action learning applied online. Human Resource Development lnremarional 9. no. 2: 157-7 1.
[27] Leonard, H.S., Marquardt, M.J. (2010). The evidence for the effectiveness of action learning. Action Learning: Research and Practice Vol.7, No.2, p121-136.