Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30121
Psychometric Examination of the QUEST-25: An Online Assessment of Intellectual Curiosity and Scientific Epistemology

Authors: Matthew J. Zagumny

Abstract:

The current study reports an examination of the QUEST-25 (Q-Assessment of Undergraduate Epistemology and Scientific Thinking) online version for assessing the dispositional attitudes toward scientific thinking and intellectual curiosity among undergraduate students. The QUEST-25 consists of scientific thinking (SIQ-25) and intellectual curiosity (ICIQ-25), which were correlated in hypothesized directions with the Religious Commitment Inventory, Curiosity and Exploration Inventory, Belief in Science scale, and measures of academic self-efficacy. Additionally, concurrent validity was established by the resulting significant differences between those identifying the centrality of religious belief in their lives and those who do not self-identify as being guided daily by religious beliefs. This study demonstrates the utility of the QUEST-25 for research, evaluation, and theory development.

Keywords: Guided-inquiry learning, intellectual curiosity, psychometric assessment, scientific thinking.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1317376

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 328

References:


[1] Berlyne, D. E., “A theory of human curiosity.” British Journal of Psychology, vol. 45, no. 3, 1954, pp. 180-191.
[2] Kazanas, S. A., Zagumny, M. J., & Clabo, K. “Inquiry-based coursework enhances students’ scientific thinking and confidence in using the scientific method.” Poster session presented at 30th Convention of the Association for Psychological Science, Mat 2018, San Francisco, CA.
[3] Osterhaus, C., Koerber, S., Sodian, B., “Scientific thinking in elementary school: Children’s social cognition and their epistemological understanding promote experimentation skills.” Developmental Psychology, vol. 53, no. 3, 2017, pp. 450-462.
[4] Zagumny, M. J. “Q-Test of Undergraduate Epistemology and Scientific Thinking: Development and testing of an assessment of scientific epistemology.” International Journal of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 10, no. 5, 2016, pp. 1563-1569.
[5] W. Stephenson, “Introduction to Q-Methodology.” Operant Subjectivity, vol. 17, nos. 1/2, 1993/1994, pp. 1-13.
[6] “Disposition,” In Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disposition.
[7] T. Barrett, "The problem‐based learning process as finding and being in flow". Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Vol. 47, no. 2, 2010, pp. 165–174. doi:10.1080/14703291003718901.
[8] S. H. Wells, P. J. Warelow, K. L. Jackson, "Problem based learning (PBL): A conundrum". Contemporary Nurse. Vol. 33, no. 2, 2009, pp. 191–201. doi:10.5172/conu.2009.33.2.191 PMID 19929163.
[9] W. Antepohl, S. Herzig, S. "Problem-based learning versus lecture-based learning in a course of basic pharmacology: A controlled, randomized study". Medical education, vol. 33, 1991, pp. 106–113. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00289.x.
[10] Kashdan et al. “The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics.” Journal of Research in Personality, vol. 43, no. 6, 2009, pp. 967-998.
[11] M. Farias, A. K. Newheiser, G. Kahane, & Z. de Toledo, “Scientific faith: Belief in science increases in the face of stress and existential anxiety.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 49, no. 6, 2013, pp. 1210-1213.
[12] E. L. Worthington et al, “The Religious Commitment Inventory-10: Development, refinement, and validation of a brief scale for research and counseling,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 50, no. 1, 2003, pp. 84-96.
[13] A. Zajacova, S. M. Lynch, & T. J. Espenshade, “Self-efficacy, stress, and academic success in college.” Research in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 6, 2005, pp. 677-706.
[14] D. T. Cambell, & D. W. Fisk, “Convergent and divergent validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 56, no. 2, 1959, pp. 81-105.
[15] R. H. Hoyle, M. J. Harris, & C. M. Judd, “Research Methods in Social Relations (8th ed),” 2009, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
[16] M. J. Zagumny, 2017, “Loose the lectures: Using creative-inquiry in the social sciences,” Keynote Address at the MacroTrend Conference on Social Sciences, December 21-22, 2017, Paris, FR.