The Role of Blended Modality in Enhancing Active Learning Strategies in Higher Education: A Case Study of a Hybrid Course of Oral Production and Listening of French
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
The Role of Blended Modality in Enhancing Active Learning Strategies in Higher Education: A Case Study of a Hybrid Course of Oral Production and Listening of French

Authors: Tharwat N. Hijjawi

Abstract:

Learning oral skills in an Arabic speaking environment is challenging. A blended course (material, activities, and individual/ group work tasks …) was implemented in a module of level B1 for undergraduate students of French as a foreign language in order to increase their opportunities to practice listening and speaking skills. This research investigates the influence of this modality on enhancing active learning and examines the effectiveness of provided strategies. Moreover, it aims at discovering how it allows teacher to flip the traditional classroom and create a learner-centered framework. Which approaches were integrated to motivate students and urge them to search, analyze, criticize, create and accomplish projects? What was the perception of students? This paper is based on the qualitative findings of a questionnaire and a focus group interview with learners. Despite the doubled time and effort both “teacher” and “student” needed, results revealed that the NTIC allowed a shift into a learning paradigm where learners were the “chiefs” of the process. Tasks and collaborative projects required higher intellectual capacities from them. Learners appreciated this experience and developed new life-long learning competencies at many levels: social, affective, ethical and cognitive. To conclude, they defined themselves as motivated young researchers, motivators and critical thinkers.

Keywords: Active learning, critical thinking, inverted classroom, learning paradigm, problem-based.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1317124

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 998

References:


[1] Jézégou A., (2005), Formation ouverte: libertés de choix et autodirection de l’apprenant, Paris: L’harmattan.
[2] Rivens Mompean, A., (2009), «Trajectoire institutionnel du CRL Lille 3: Les étapes clé du dispositif», in Rivens Mompean, A., et Barbot, M.-J. (édit), Dispositif médiatisés en langues et accompagnement tutorat, Lille: Université Lille 3.
[3] Berrett, D. (2012). “How 'flipping' the classroom can improve the traditional lecture”. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Washington, D.C. Available online, consulted on 30/11/2016: https://people.ok.ubc.ca/cstother/How_Flipping_the_Classroom_Can_Improve_the_Traditional_Lecture.pdf.
[4] Johnson, G. (2013). Student perception of the Flipped Classroom. Kelowna: The University of British Columbia.
[5] Bélisle, C., (2003), « Médiation humaines et médiations technologiques » Médiation, Médiatisation et Apprentissages, Journée NEQ, ENS Lettres et sciences Humaines à Lyon pp.21-34
[6] Grosjean, S., & Charrette, Y., (2000). «Vers une communauté apprenante: L’intégration d’une vision constructiviste à un dispositif de formation à distance ». IFLI 2000 (Institut de formation linguistique intégral).
[7] Kohonen, V. (1992): “Experiential learning: second language learning as cooperative learner education”. In David Nunan (Ed.) “Collaborative Language Learning and Teaching”, Cambridge University Press.
[8] Nash, R., (2014). The active classroom: Practical strategies for involving students in the learning process. USA: Corwin Press.
[9] Rivens Mompean, A., (2012) «Tutorat en ligne – Analyse des pratiques d'interaction et de feedback dans un blogue pour l'apprentissage de l'anglais », in Ciekansk, M., et Dejean-Thircuir, C., (dir.) Alsic, Vol. 15, n° 2 | 2012 Spécial Epal 2011.
[10] Pourtois, J.-P., & Desmet, H., (1999), L’éducation postmoderne, Paris: PUF.
[11] Poisson, Y., 1991. La recherche qualitative en éducation. Québec, PUQ.
[12] Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[13] Onwuegbuzie, A., J., & al., 2009. “A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and yzing DAnalata in Focus Group Research”, in IJQM 8, University of Alberata.
[14] Tardif, J., (1998), Intégrer les nouvelles technologies de l’information: Quel cadre pédagogique? Paris: ESF éditeur.
[15] Barbot, M., J., & Massou, L., (2011), TIC et métiers de l’enseignement supérieur. Émergence, transformation, Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.
[16] Hijjawi, T., (2012) ‘‘Towards the Autonomisation of University Student: Evaluation of Students’ Perception and Practice of ICT in Foreign languages Learning’’, in TOJDEL, Vol. 1, Issue 2. 2012.
[17] Hijjawi, T. (2013). Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for Foreign Language Teaching in Palestinian Universities… Yes, but How? Evaluation of policies and pedagogical innovation of ICT integration into the higher Palestinian educational system., Lille: University Lille 3 Charles de Gaulle.