Energy Loss Reduction in Oil Refineries through Flare Gas Recovery Approaches

Authors: Majid Amidpour, Parisa Karimi, Marzieh Joda

Abstract:

For the last few years, release of burned undesirable by-products has become a challenging issue in oil industries. Flaring, as one of the main sources of air contamination, involves detrimental and long-lasting effects on human health and is considered a substantial reason for energy losses worldwide. This research involves studying the implications of two main flare gas recovery methods at three oil refineries, all in Iran as the case I, case II, and case III in which the production capacities are increasing respectively. In the proposed methods, flare gases are converted into more valuable products, before combustion by the flare networks. The first approach involves collecting, compressing and converting the flare gas to smokeless fuel which can be used in the fuel gas system of the refineries. The other scenario includes utilizing the flare gas as a feed into liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) production unit already established in the refineries. The processes of these scenarios are simulated, and the capital investment is calculated for each procedure. The cumulative profits of the scenarios are evaluated using Net Present Value method. Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis based on total propane and butane mole fraction is carried out to make a rational comparison for LPG production approach, and the results are illustrated for different mole fractions of propane and butane. As the mole fraction of propane and butane contained in LPG differs in summer and winter seasons, the results corresponding to LPG scenario are demonstrated for each season. The results of the simulations show that cumulative profit in fuel gas production scenario and LPG production rate increase with the capacity of the refineries. Moreover, the investment return time in LPG production method experiences a decline, followed by a rising trend with an increase in C₃ and C₄ content. The minimum value of time return occurs at propane and butane sum concentration values of 0.7, 0.6, and 0.7 in case I, II, and III, respectively. Based on comparison of the time of investment return and cumulative profit, fuel gas production is the superior scenario for three case studies.

Keywords: Flare gas reduction, liquefied petroleum gas, fuel gas, net present value method, sensitivity analysis.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1317096

References:

[1] World Bank., 2004, Regulation of associated gas flaring and venting. A global overview and lessons from international experience Global gas flaring reduction. Report Number 29554.
[2] Tanna C., 2004. Worldwide Gas Flaring, Presentation pour la 2eme conference du GGFR, Banque Mondiale.
[3] Basu A, Akhtar J, Rahman MH, Islam MR., 2004. A review of separation of gases using membrane systems. J. Pet Sci Tech. 22,1343-1368.
[4] Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL., 2007. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Ch. 2, pp. 212
[5] World Bank Group., 2004, Global gas flaring reduction initiative, in collaboration with the government of Norway, Report on consultations with Stakeholders, Report Number: 27275.
[6] Shell Oil Products US, Martinez Refinery. 2007. Flare Minimization Plan. Submitted to: Bay Area Air Quality Management District NO. A0011.
[7] http://en.nioc.ir/Portal/Home/Default.aspx, Accessed on 12/06/2016.
[8] Abdulkareem AS, Odigure JO, Abenege S., 2009. Predictive Model for Pollutant Dispersion from Gas Flaring: A Case Study of Oil Producing Area of Nigeria. J. Energy Sources. 31, 1004–1015.
[9] Xu Q, Yang X, Liu C, Li K, H Lou, Gossage L., 2009, Chemical plants flare minimization via plant wide dynamic simulation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 3505-3512.
[10] Matthew R. Johnson and Adam R. Coderre, An Analysis of Flaring and Venting Activity in the Alberta Upstream Oil and Gas Industry, Pages 190-200, published online: 10 Oct 2011.
[11] Rahimpour MR, Jokar SM., 2012, Feasibility of flare gas reformation to practical energy in Farashband Gas Refinery. J Hazard Mater 209–210:204–217.
[12] Davoudi M, Rahimpour MR, Jokar SM, Nikbakht F, Abbasfard H., 2013. The major sources of gas flaring and air contamination in the natural gas processing plants: A case study. J. Nat Gas Sci Eng. 13, 7-19.
[13] Zadakbar O, Vatani A, Karimpour K., 2008. Flare gas recovery in oil and gas refineries. Oil and Gas Science and Technology. 63, 705-711.
[14] Engarnevis A, Amidpour M, Jafari H., 2013. Replacing of mechanical compressors by gas ejectors in flare gas recovery systems. J. Oil, Gas and Coal Technology. 6, NO. 4.
[15] http://www.baorco.ir/index.aspx?fkeyid=&siteid=1&fkeyid=&siteid=1&pageid=218, Accessed on 18/05/2016.
[16] Gouvea MT, Odloak D., 1998. One-layer real time optimization of LPG production in the FCC unit: procedure, advantages and disadvantages. J. Computers Chem Engng. 22, S191-S198.
[17] Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West RE., 2003. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
[18] Stanley M. Walas., 1988. Chemical Process Equipment Selection and Design, PP. 613-628.
[19] Turton R, Bailie. R.C., Whiting W.B., Shaeiwitz J. A., Bhattacharyya D., 2009. Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes, Forth ed. Prentice Hall.