Introduction of an Approach of Complex Virtual Devices to Achieve Device Interoperability in Smart Building Systems
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Introduction of an Approach of Complex Virtual Devices to Achieve Device Interoperability in Smart Building Systems

Authors: Thomas Meier

Abstract:

One of the major challenges for sustainable smart building systems is to support device interoperability, i.e. connecting sensor or actuator devices from different vendors, and present their functionality to the external applications. Furthermore, smart building systems are supposed to connect with devices that are not available yet, i.e. devices that become available on the market sometime later. It is of vital importance that a sustainable smart building platform provides an appropriate external interface that can be leveraged by external applications and smart services. An external platform interface must be stable and independent of specific devices and should support flexible and scalable usage scenarios. A typical approach applied in smart home systems is based on a generic device interface used within the smart building platform. Device functions, even of rather complex devices, are mapped to that generic base type interface by means of specific device drivers. Our new approach, presented in this work, extends that approach by using the smart building system’s rule engine to create complex virtual devices that can represent the most diverse properties of real devices. We examined and evaluated both approaches by means of a practical case study using a smart building system that we have developed. We show that the solution we present allows the highest degree of flexibility without affecting external application interface stability and scalability. In contrast to other systems our approach supports complex virtual device configuration on application layer (e.g. by administration users) instead of device configuration at platform layer (e.g. platform operators). Based on our work, we can show that our approach supports almost arbitrarily flexible use case scenarios without affecting the external application interface stability. However, the cost of this approach is additional appropriate configuration overhead and additional resource consumption at the IoT platform level that must be considered by platform operators. We conclude that the concept of complex virtual devices presented in this work can be applied to improve the usability and device interoperability of sustainable intelligent building systems significantly.

Keywords: Complex virtual devices, device integration, device interoperability, Internet of Things, smart building platform.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1317058

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 759

References:


[1] I. T. Union, “Overview of the Internet of Things,” I. T. Union, Recommendation ITU-T Y.2060, 2012.
[2] A. Gnther and T. Meier, “A modular system for building automation,” in Proceedings 55. International Scientific Colloquium, TU Ilmenau, 2010.
[3] Q. Zhu, R. Wang, Q. Chen, Y. Liu, and W. Qin, “IOT Gateway: Bridging Wireless Sensor Networks into Internet of Things,” in 2010 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, Dec 2010, pp. 347–352.
[4] A. Mynzhasova, C. Radojicic, C. Heinz, J. Klsch, C. Grimm, J. Rico, K. Dickerson, R. Garca-Castro, and V. Oravec, “Drivers, standards and platforms for the iot: Towards a digital vicinity,” in 2017 Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys), Sept 2017, pp. 170–176.
[5] S. K. Lee, M. Bae, and H. Kim, “Future of iot networks: A survey,” Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 10, 2017. (Online). Available: http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/7/10/1072.
[6] P. Masek, J. Hosek, K. Zeman, M. Stusek, D. Kovac, P. Cika, J. Masek, S. Andreev, and F. Kröpfl, “Implementation of true iot vision,” Int. J. Distrib. Sen. Netw., vol. 2016, Apr. 2016. (Online). Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8160282.
[7] R. T. Fielding, “REST: architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures,” Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine, 2000. (Online). Available: http://www.ics.uci.edu/ fielding/pubs/dissertation/top.htm.
[8] “Zigbee alliance,” http://www.zigbee.org/, accessed: 2018-04-18.
[9] “Mq telemetry transport,” http://mqtt.org/, accessed: 2018-04-18.
[10] D. Thangavel, X. Ma, A. Valera, H. X. Tan, and C. K. Y. Tan, “Performance evaluation of mqtt and coap via a common middleware,” in 2014 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP), April 2014, pp. 1–6.
[11] L. Reinfurt, U. Breitenb¨ucher, M. Falkenthal, F. Leymann, and A. Riegg, “Internet of things patterns,” in Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, ser. EuroPlop ’16. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2016, pp. 5:1–5:21. (Online). Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3011784.3011789.
[12] “Eclipse smarthome - a flexible framework for the smart home,” https://www.eclipse.org/smarthome/, accessed: 2018-03-21.
[13] F. Heimgaertner, S. Hettich, O. Kohlbacher, and M. Menth, “Scaling home automation to public buildings: A distributed multiuser setup for openhab 2,” in 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS), June 2017, pp. 1–6.
[14] “openhab - empowering the smart home,” https://www.openhab.org/, accessed: 2018-03-24.
[15] “Edgex foundry a linux foundation project,” https://www.edgexfoundry.org/, accessed: 2018-04-4.
[16] “Iotivity a linux foundation project,” https://www.iotivity.org/, accessed: 2018-02-24.
[17] “relayr iot middleware platfrom,” https://relayr.io/en/iot-middleware-platform/, accessed: 2018-04-17.
[18] Y. Sun, T. Y. Wu, G. Zhao, and M. Guizani, “Efficient rule engine for smart building systems,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1658–1669, June 2015.
[19] A. Salihbegovic, T. Eterovic, E. Kaljic, and S. Ribic, “Design of a domain specific language and ide for internet of things applications,” in 2015 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), May 2015, pp. 996–1001.
[20] “jquery write less, do more,” http://jquery.com/, accessed: 2018-04-21.
[21] “Sizzle a javascript selector engine,” https://sizzlejs.com/, accessed: 2018-04-21.
[22] A. Salihbegovic, T. Eterovic, E. Kaljic, and S. Ribic, “Design of a domain specific language and ide for internet of things applications,” in 2015 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), May 2015, pp. 996–1001.