Humans as Enrichment: Human-Animal Interactions and the Perceived Benefit to the Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus), Human and Zoological Establishment

Authors: S. J. Higgs, E. Van Eck, K. Heynis, S. H. Broadberry

Abstract:

Engagement with non-human animals is a rapidly-growing field of study within the animal science and social science sectors, with human-interactions occurring in many forms; interactions, encounters and animal-assisted therapy. To our knowledge, there has been a wide array of research published on domestic and livestock human-animal interactions, however, there appear to be fewer publications relating to zoo animals and the effect these interactions have on the animal, human and establishment. The aim of this study was to identify if there were any perceivable benefits from the human-animal interaction for the cheetah, the human and the establishment. Behaviour data were collected before, during and after the interaction on the behaviour of the cheetah and the human participants to highlight any trends with nine interactions conducted. All 35 participants were asked to fill in a questionnaire prior to the interaction and immediately after to ascertain if their perceptions changed following an interaction with the cheetah. An online questionnaire was also distributed for three months to gain an understanding of the perceptions of human-animal interactions from members of the public, gaining 229 responses. Both questionnaires contained qualitative and quantitative questions to allow for specific definitive answers to be analysed, but also expansion on the participants perceived perception of human-animal interactions. In conclusion, it was found that participants’ perceptions of human-animal interactions saw a positive change, with 64% of participants altering their opinion and viewing the interaction as beneficial for the cheetah (reduction in stress assumed behaviours) following participation in a 15-minute interaction. However, it was noted that many participants felt the interaction lacked educational values and therefore this is an area in which zoological establishments can work to further improve upon. The results highlighted many positive benefits for the human, animal and establishment, however, the study does indicate further areas for research in order to promote positive perceptions of human-animal interactions and to further increase the welfare of the animal during these interactions, with recommendations to create and regulate legislation.

Keywords: Acinonyx jubatus, encounters, human-animal interactions, perceptions, zoological establishments.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1316209

References:

[1] T. Tyler, and M, S., Rossini, 2009, Animal Encounters, USA: Brill (vol. 6), pp. 1 – 10
[2] C. Bulbeck., 2012, Facing the wild: ecotourism, conservation and animal encounters, AU: Earthscan, pp. 1 – 213
[3] A. M., Claxton, 2011, The potential of the human-animal relationship as an environmental enrichment for the welfare of zoo-housed animals, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 133, pp. 1 – 10
[4] G. R., Hosey, 2000, Zoo animals and their human audiences: what is the visitor effect?, Animal Welfare, 9, pp. 343 - 357
[5] M, L., Gore, 2017, Conservation Criminology, Nature, pp. 133 – 138
[6] C. C. Wilson., and S. B. Barker, 2003, Challenges in designing human-animal interaction research, American Behavioural Scientist, 47(1), pp. 16 - 28
[7] S. Cook. and G. R., Hosey, 1995, Interaction sequences between chimpanzees and human visitors at the zoo, Zoo Biology, 14 (5), pp. 431 – 440
[8] G. Hosey, 2007, A preliminary model of human-animal relationships in the zoo, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 209, pp. 105 – 127
[9] T. Quirke., R. M. O’Riordian, and A. Zuur, 2012, Factors influencing the prevalence of stereotypical behaviours in captive cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 142(3), pp. 189 - 197
[10] B. Daly and L. L. Morton, 2006, An investigation of human-animal interactions and empathy as related to pet preference, ownership, attachment, and attitudes in children, Anthrozoos, 19(2), pp. 113 – 127
[11] J. Nimer and B. Lundahl, 2015, Animal-assisted therapy: a meta-analysis, Anthrozoos, 20(3), pp. 225 - 238
[12] K. B. Wright, 2005, Researching internet-based populations: advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), pp. 1 - 11
[13] J. R. Evans., and A. Mather, 2005, The value of online surveys, Internet Research, 15(2), pp. 195 - 219
[14] C. A. Davies, 2012, Reflexive ethnography: a guide to researching selves and others, UK: Routledge, pp. 1 - 272
[15] L. I. Meho., 2006, E-mail interviewing in qualitative research: a methodological discussion, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (10), pp. 1284 – 1295
[16] E. P. Lane, S. Miller, R. Lobetti, P. Caldwell, H. J. Bertschinger, R. Burroughs, A. Kotze and A. Van Dyk, 2011: Effect of diet on the incidence of and mortality owing to gastritis and renal disease in captive cheetahs in South Africa, Zoo Biology, 31(6), pp. 669 - 682
[17] K. M. Whitehouse- Tedd, S. L. Lefebvre and G. P. J. Janssens, 2015, Dietary factors associated with faecal consistency and other indicators of gastrointestinal health in captive cheetah, PLoS One, 10(4), pp. 1 - 12
[18] J. Topal, M. Gacsi, A. Miklose, Z. Viranyi, E. Kubinyl and V, Csanyi, 2005, Attachment to humans: a comparative study on hand-reared wolves and differently socialised dog puppies, Animal Behaviour, 70(6), pp. 1367 - 1375
[19] D. C. Turner and P. P. G. Bateson, 2010, The domestic cat: The biology of its behaviour, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1 – 244
[20] S. M. Shepherd, A. Mills and W. H. Shoff, 2014, Human attacks by large felid carnivores in captivity and in the wild, Wilderness and Environmental Medicine, 25(2), pp. 220 - 230
[21] P. A. Rees, 2011, An introduction to zoo biology and management, UK: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 1 – 393
[22] J. Richardson, 2015, The importance of zoos: a three-fold look at conservation, education and animal husbandry in AZA-accredited zoological facilities, pp. 1-38
[23] J, Flanagan, 2015, American women killed by lion, (online) Available at: (Accessed 28th August 2017)
[24] CITES, 2017, Appendices I, II and III: Valid 4th April 2017, (online) Available at: (Accessed 6th August 2017)
[25] S. P. Hill and D. M. Broom, 2009, Measuring zoo animal welfare: theory and practice, Zoo Biology, 28(6), pp. 531 - 544
[26] D. J. Mellor, 2016, Updating animal welfare thinking: moving beyond the five freedoms towards a life worth living, Animals, 6(3), pp. 21 - 31
[27] D. Ianuzzi and A. N. Rowan, 2015, Ethical issues in animal assisted therapy programs, Anthrozoos, 4(3), pp. 154 – 163
[28] L. S. Reade and N. K. Waran, 1996, The modern zoo: how do people perceive zoo animals?, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 47(1-2), pp. 109 – 118
[29] K. Markwell, 2015, Animals and tourism: understanding diverse relationships, USA: Channel View Publications, pp. 1 – 344