Study on the Impact of Size and Position of the Shear Field in Determining the Shear Modulus of Glulam Beam Using Photogrammetry Approach
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32804
Study on the Impact of Size and Position of the Shear Field in Determining the Shear Modulus of Glulam Beam Using Photogrammetry Approach

Authors: Niaz Gharavi, Hexin Zhang

Abstract:

The shear modulus of a timber beam can be determined using torsion test or shear field test method. The shear field test method is based on shear distortion measurement of the beam at the zone with the constant transverse load in the standardized four-point bending test. The current code of practice advises using two metallic arms act as an instrument to measure the diagonal displacement of the constructing square. The size and the position of the constructing square might influence the shear modulus determination. This study aimed to investigate the size and the position effect of the square in the shear field test method. A binocular stereo vision system has been employed to determine the 3D displacement of a grid of target points. Six glue laminated beams were produced and tested. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed on the acquired data to evaluate the significance of the size effect and the position effect of the square. The results have shown that the size of the square has a noticeable influence on the value of shear modulus, while, the position of the square within the area with the constant shear force does not affect the measured mean shear modulus.

Keywords: Shear field test method, structural-sized test, shear modulus of Glulam beam, photogrammetry approach.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1315953

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 946

References:


[1] BSI, BS EN 408:2010+A1:2012: Timber structures - Structural Timber and Glued Laminated Timber - Determination of Some Physical and Mechanical Properties. London, UK: The British Standards Institution, 2010.
[2] D. S. Riyanto and R. Gupta, “A Comparison of Test Methods for Evaluating Shear Strength of Structural Lumber,” Forest Products Journal, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 83–90, 1998.
[3] R. Brandner, B. Freytag, and G. Schickhofer, “Determination of shear modulus by means of standardized four-point bending tests,” in CIB W18, no. August, St. Andrews, Canada, 2008, pp. 41–21–1.
[4] R. Brandner, E. Gehri, T. Bogensperger, and G. Schickhofer, “Determination of modulus of shear and elasticity of glued laminated timber and related examinations,” in CIB-W18, Bled, Slovenia, 2007, pp. 40–12–2.
[5] BSI, BS EN 338:2016: BSI, Structural Timber Strength Classes. London, UK: The British Standards Institution, 2016.
[6] C. Wohler, 3D computer vision: efficient methods and applications, 2nd ed. London, UK: Springer, 2013.
[7] A. Valsaraj, A. Barik, P. Vishak, and K. Midhun, “Stereo Vision System Implemented on FPGA,” Procedia Technology, vol. 24, pp. 1105–1112, 2016.
[8] N. Gharavi, H. Zhang, Y. Xie, and T. He, “End effect on determining shear modulus of timber beams in torsion tests,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 164, pp. 442–450, 2018.