Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30075
Risk and Uncertainty in Aviation: A Thorough Analysis of System Vulnerabilities

Authors: C. V. Pietreanu, S. E. Zaharia, C. Dinu

Abstract:

Hazard assessment and risks quantification are key components for estimating the impact of existing regulations. But since regulatory compliance cannot cover all risks in aviation, the authors point out that by studying causal factors and eliminating uncertainty, an accurate analysis can be outlined. The research debuts by making delimitations on notions, as confusion on the terms over time has reflected in less rigorous analysis. Throughout this paper, it will be emphasized the fact that the variation in human performance and organizational factors represent the biggest threat from an operational perspective. Therefore, advanced risk assessment methods analyzed by the authors aim to understand vulnerabilities of the system given by a nonlinear behavior. Ultimately, the mathematical modeling of existing hazards and risks by eliminating uncertainty implies establishing an optimal solution (i.e. risk minimization).

Keywords: Control, human factor, optimization, risk management, uncertainty.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1315717

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 871

References:


[1] C. V. Pietreanu, Contribuţii la dezvoltarea metodelor de analiză a accidentelor de zbor, PhD Thesis, Bucharest, July 2016, pp. 10-29, pp. 55-56.
[2] T. Bedford, R. Cooke, Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 2001.
[3] I. Slavici, Rezolvarea numerică a problemelor de optimizare, Matematici asistate de calculator, Note de Curs.
[4] T. J. Mavin, G. Dall'alba, Understanding Complex Assessment: A Lesson From Aviation, Proceedings of ICERI 2011 Conference, Madrid, Spain, pp. 2-8, 14-16 November 2011.
[5] Guide to Risk Assessment & Response, Enterprise Risk Management Program, University of Vermont, pp. 1-26, August C. J. Kaufman, Rocky Mountain Research Lab., Boulder, CO, private communication, May 1995.
[6] R. Wipple, LOSA (Line Operations Safety Audit), Basic error management concepts, pp.1-10M. Young, The Techincal Writers Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University Science, 1989.
[7] Risk management handbook, U.S. Department of Transport, Federal Aviation Administration, pp. 1-5, 2009.
[8] http://ebooks.unibuc.ro/StiinteADM/cornescu/cap5.htm
[9] EASA Annual Safety Recommendations Review Overview of key safety issues processed and actions carried out in 2015.
[10] ICAO Doc 9422, Accident Prevention Programme.
[11] ICAO Doc 9806, Human Factors Guidelines for Safety Audits Manual
[12] https://aviation-safety.net (Accessed 3 November 2017).
[13] http://www.icao.int/safety/iStars/Pages/Accident-Statistics.aspx (Accessed 7 March 2017).
[14] https://www.iata.org/IATA/Controlled/Flight/Into/Terrain/Accident/Analysis (Accessed 7 March 2017).
[15] A. Roelen, Causal risk models of air transport-Comparison of user needs and model capabilities, Delft University Press, pp.115-116, 2008
[16] J. Reason, An analysis of 122 quality lapses in aircraft engineering, Manchester, UK: University of Manchester, Department of Psychology, pp. 3-4, 1992.
[17] https://www.icao.int/safety/Pages/USOAP-Results.aspx (Accessed 19 March 2017).
[18] http://www.automation.ucv.ro/Romana/cursuri/optimizari42.pdf, pp. 7-8 (Accessed 12 November 2015).
[19] C. V. Pietreanu, S. E. Zaharia, Perspectives on accident modeling in aviation, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Air Transport “INAIR”, 14-16 October 2017, Prague, Czech Republic, pp 36-44, ISBN 978-80-554-1387-7