Criteria Analysis of Residential Location Preferences: An Urban Dwellers’ Perspective

Authors: Arati Siddharth Petkar, Joel E. M. Macwan

Abstract:

Preferences for residential location are of a diverse nature. Primarily they are based on the socio-economic, socio-cultural, socio-demographic characteristics of the household. It also depends on character, and the growth potential of different areas in a city. In the present study, various criteria affecting residential location preferences from the Urban Dwellers’ perspective have been analyzed. The household survey has been conducted in two parts: Existing Buyers’ survey and Future Buyers’ survey. The analysis reveals that workplace location is the most governing criterion in deciding residential location from the majority of the urban dwellers perspective. For analyzing the importance of varied criteria, Analytical Hierarchy Process approach has been explored. The suggested approach will be helpful for urban planners, decision makers and developers, while designating a new residential area or redeveloping an existing one.

Keywords: Analytical hierarchy process, household, preferences, residential location preferences, residential land use, urban dwellers.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1315675

References:

[1] Government of India, “Census of India 2011” 2011.
[2] A. S. Petkar and J. E. M. Macwan, “Urban Housing and Policies in India: Review and Research Challenges,” J. Indian Inst. Archit., vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 26–31, 2014.
[3] A. S. Petkar and J. E. M. Macwan, “Framework of Analytical Hierarchy Process based on Residential Location Preferences,” in Proceeding of the Neo-International Conference on Habitable Environments, 2014, pp. 513–518.
[4] A. Patil, A. Das, and T. Mazumder, “Residential Location Choice: A Study of Household Preferences for the City of Nagpur,” no. September, pp. 1–19, 2010.
[5] A. S. Petkar and J. E. M. Macwan, “Residential Location Preferences: Approaches and Research Avenues,” in Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Advances in Civil Engineering, 2013, pp. 903–909.
[6] T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” Int. J. Serv. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 83, 2008.
[7] R. Bhatt, D. Bhatt, and V. Patel, “Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach for Criteria Ranking of Sustainable Building Assessment: A Case Study,” World Appl. Sci., vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 881–888, 2010.
[8] M. Velasquez and P. T. Hester, “An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods,” Int. J. Operarations Res., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 56–66, 2013.
[9] T. L. Saaty, “How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 1990.