Analysis and Design of Offshore Triceratops under Ultra-Deep Waters

Authors: Srinivasan Chandrasekaran, R. Nagavinothini

Abstract:

Offshore platforms for ultra-deep waters are form-dominant by design; hybrid systems with large flexibility in horizontal plane and high rigidity in vertical plane are preferred due to functional complexities. Offshore triceratops is relatively a new-generation offshore platform, whose deck is partially isolated from the supporting buoyant legs by ball joints. They allow transfer of partial displacements of buoyant legs to the deck but restrain transfer of rotational response. Buoyant legs are in turn taut-moored to the sea bed using pre-tension tethers. Present study will discuss detailed dynamic analysis and preliminary design of the chosen geometric, which is necessary as a proof of validation for such design applications. A detailed numeric analysis of triceratops at 2400 m water depth under random waves is presented. Preliminary design confirms member-level design requirements under various modes of failure. Tether configuration, proposed in the study confirms no pull-out of tethers as stress variation is comparatively lesser than the yield value. Presented study shall aid offshore engineers and contractors to understand suitability of triceratops, in terms of design and dynamic response behaviour.

Keywords: Buoyant legs, dynamic analysis, offshore structures, preliminary design, random waves, triceratops.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1314540

References:

[1] Capanoglu, C.C., Shaver, C.B., Hirayama, H. and Sao, K., 2002, January. Comparison of model test results and analytical motion analyses for a buoyant leg structure. In The Twelfth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
[2] Chandrasekaran, S., Sundaravadivelu, R., Pannerselvam, R., Madhuri, S. and Varthini, D.S., 2011, January. Experimental investigations of offshore triceratops under regular waves. In Proc. 30th International Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engg, OMAE.
[3] Chandrasekaran, S. and Seeram, M., 2012. Stability studies on offshore triceratops. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 1(10), pp.398-404.
[4] Chandrasekaran, S., Madhuri, S. and Jain, A.K., 2013. Aerodynamic response of offshore triceratops. Ships and Offshore Structures, 8(2), pp.123-140.
[5] Chandrasekaran, S. and Nannaware, M., 2014. Response analyses of offshore triceratops to seismic activities. Ships and Offshore Structures, 9(6), pp.633-642.
[6] Chandrasekaran, S., Mayank, S. and Jain, A., 2015, May. Dynamic response behavior of stiffened triceratops under regular waves: experimental investigations. In Paper presented at: Thirty Fourth International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering.
[7] Chandrasekaran S, Madhuri S. 2015. Dynamic response of offshore triceratops: Numerical and experimental investigations. Ocean Engineering. 109:401-409.
[8] Chandrasekaran S and Jamshed Nassery. 2015. Springing and ringing response of offshore triceratops. In: ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, St. Johns, Newfoundland, Canda; May31-June 5. p.1-6.
[9] Chandrasekaran S, Mayank S. 2017. Dynamic analyses of stiffened triceratops under regular waves: experimental investigations. Ships and Offshore Structures. 12(5):697-705.
[10] Chen Y, Zimmer RA, de Oliveira JG, Jan HY. 1985. Buckling and Ultimate Strength of Stiffened Cylinders: Model Experiments and Strength Formulations. In: Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas; May 6-9. p. 113-124.
[11] Copple, R.W. and Capanoglu, C.C., 1995, January. A buoyant leg structure for the development of marginal fields in deep water. In The Fifth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
[12] DNV DN. 2005. Fatigue design of offshore steel structures. Recommended practice DNV-RP-C203.
[13] Liapis, S., Bhat, S., Caracostis, C., Webb, C. and Lohr, C., 2010. Global performance of the Perdido spar in waves, wind and current–numerical predictions and comparison with experiments. OMAE2010-2116.
[14] Reddy, D.V. and Swamidas, A.S.J., 2013. Essentials of offshore structures: framed and gravity platforms. CRC press.
[15] Shaver, C.B., Capanoglu, C.C. and Serrahn, C.S., 2001, January. Buoyant leg structure preliminary design, constructed cost and model test results. In The Eleventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
[16] Srinivasan Chandrasekaran. 2015. Dynamic analysis and design of ocean structures. Springer, India, ISBN: 978-81-322-2276-7.
[17] Srinivasan Chandrasekaran. 2017. Dynamic analysis and design of ocean structures, Springer, 2nd Ed., Singapore.
[18] Tabeshpour, M.R., Golafshani, A.A. and Seif, M.S., 2006. Comprehensive study on the results of tension leg platform responses in random sea. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A, 7(8), pp.1305-1317.
[19] Veritas, D.N., 2010. Buckling Strength of Shells, Recommended Practice DNV-RP-C202. Det. Nor. Ver. Class. AS, Veritasveien, 1.
[20] White CN, Copple RW, Capanoglu C. 2005. Triceratops: an effective platform for developing oil and gas fields in deep and ultra-deep water. In: The Fifteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Seoul, Korea; June 19-24. p. 133-139.