Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 30127
Comparison between Post- and Oxy-Combustion Systems in a Petroleum Refinery Unit Using Modeling and Optimization

Authors: Farooq A. Al-Sheikh, Ali Elkamel, William A. Anderson

Abstract:

A fluidized catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) is one of the effective units in many refineries. Modeling and optimization of FCCU were done by many researchers in past decades, but in this research, comparison between post- and oxy-combustion was studied in the regenerator-FCCU. Therefore, a simplified mathematical model was derived by doing mass/heat balances around both reactor and regenerator. A state space analysis was employed to show effects of the flow rates variables such as air, feed, spent catalyst, regenerated catalyst and flue gas on the output variables. The main aim of studying dynamic responses is to figure out the most influencing variables that affect both reactor/regenerator temperatures; also, finding the upper/lower limits of the influencing variables to ensure that temperatures of the reactors and regenerator work within normal operating conditions. Therefore, those values will be used as side constraints in the optimization technique to find appropriate operating regimes. The objective functions were modeled to be maximizing the energy in the reactor while minimizing the energy consumption in the regenerator. In conclusion, an oxy-combustion process can be used instead of a post-combustion one.

Keywords: FCCU modeling, optimization, oxy-combustion post-combustion.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1314494

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 463

References:


[1] Lieberman, N. P. (2009). Troubleshooting process operations (4th Edition). PennWell.
[2] Gary, J. H., Handwerk, G. E., & Kaiser, M. J. (2007). Petroleum Refining: technology and economics (5th Edition). CRC press.
[3] Lecomte, Fabrice Broutin, Paul Lebas, Etienne. (2010). CO2 Capture - Technologies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Editions Technip.
[4] Perregaard, J. (1993). Model simplification and reduction for simulation and optimization of chemical processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 17(5-6), 465–483.
[5] Brendel, M., Bonvin, D., & Marquardt, W. (2006). Incremental identification of kinetic models for homogeneous reaction systems. Chemical Engineering Science, 61(16), 5404-5420.
[6] Brooks, R. J., & Tobias, A. M. (1996). Choosing the best model: Level of detail, complexity, and model performance. Mathematical and computer modeling, 24(4), 1-14.
[7] Wang, F. Y., Zhu, Z. H., Massarotto, P., & Rudolph, V. (2007). A simplified dynamic model for accelerated methane residual recovery from coals. Chemical engineering science, 62(12), 3268-3275.
[8] Coughanowr, D. R., & LeBlanc, S. E. (2009). Process systems analysis and control (3rd Edition). McGraw-Hill.
[9] Edgar F., Himmelblau, D., & Lasdon, L. (2001). Optimization of chemical processes (2nd Edition). McGraw-Hill Book Company.
[10] Venkataraman, P. (2009). Applied optimization with MATLAB programming (1st Edition). John Wiley & Sons.
[11] Jones, D., & Pujado, P. (2006). Handbook of petroleum processing. Dordrecht, NLD: Springer.
[12] McFarlane, R. C., Reineman, R. C., Bartee, J. F., & Georgakis, C. (1993). Dynamic simulator for a Model IV fluid catalytic cracking unit. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 17(3), 275–300.
[13] Shinnar, R., Huang, Z., Rinard, I. H., Arbel, A., & Sapre, A. V. (1995). Dynamic and control of fluidized catalytic crackers. 1. Modeling of the current generation of FCC's. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 34(4), 1228-1243.
[14] Bollas, G. M., Vasalos, I. A., Lappas, A. A., Iatridis, D. K., Voutetakis, S. S., & Papadopoulou, S. A. (2007). Integrated FCC riser—regenerator dynamics studied in a fluid catalytic cracking pilot plant. Chemical engineering science, 62(7), 1887-1904.
[15] Fahim, M. A., Alsahhaf, T. A. & Elkilani, A. (2010). Fundamentals of petroleum refining (1st Edition). Elsevier.
[16] Sadeghbeigi, R. (2012). Fluid Catalytic Cracking Handbook - An Expert Guide to the Practical Operation, Design, and Optimization of FCC Units (3rd Edition). Elsevier.
[17] De Mello, L. F., Gobbo, R., Moure, G. T., & Miracca, I. (2013). Oxy-combustion technology development for Fluid Catalytic Crackers (FCC)–large pilot scale demonstration. Energy procedia, 37, 7815-7824.
[18] Ellis, R. C., Li, X., & Riggs, J. B. (1998). Modeling and optimization of a model IV fluidized catalytic cracking unit. AIChE Journal, 44(9), 2068-2079.