Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Settlement of Environmental Disputes in South Africa
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 32795
Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Settlement of Environmental Disputes in South Africa

Authors: M. van der Bank, C. M. van der Bank

Abstract:

Alternative Dispute Resolution denotes all forms of dispute resolution other than litigation or adjudication through the courts. This definition of Alternative Dispute Resolution, however, makes no mention of a vital consideration. ADR is the generally accepted acronym for alternative dispute resolution. Despite the choice not to proceed before a court or statutory tribunal, ADR will still be regulated by law and by the Constitution. Fairness is one of the core values of the South African constitutional order. Environmental disputes occur frequently, but due to delays and costs, ADR is a mechanism to resolve this kind of disputes which is a resolution of non-judicial mechanism. ADR can be used as a mechanism in environmental disputes that are less expensive and also more expeditious than formal litigation. ADR covers a broad range of mechanisms and processes designed to assist parties in resolving disputes creatively and effectively. In so far as this may involve the selection or design of mechanisms and processes other than formal litigation, these mechanisms and processes are not intended to supplant court adjudication, but rather to supplement it. A variety of ADR methods have been developed to deal with numerous problems encountered during environmental disputes. The research questions are: How can ADR facilitate environmental disputes in South Africa? Are they appropriate? And what improvements should be made?

Keywords: Alternative dispute, environmental disputes, non-judicial, resolution and settlement.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132693

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 2272

References:


[1] Amy, D. J. (1987) The Politics of Environmental Mediation, New York: Columbia University Press. pp 165-166.
[2] Holy Bible Kings James Version 2014.
[3] Bingham, G and Haygood, L. V. Environmental Dispute Resolution: The first Ten Years, the Arbitration Journal, December 1986, Vol 41 No 4, pp 3-14. (Electronic) Available: Business Source Complete (2008 May 9).
[4] Bryan, A Garner. (2017) Black’s Law Dictionary 10th Abridged 10th edition.
[5] Casals, M. M. (2005) Divorce Mediation in Europe- An Introductory Outline University of Girona Spain.
[6] Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.
[7] Crowfoot, J. E. and Wondolleck, J. M. (1990) Environmental dispute settlement Washington, DC; Island Press p 19.
[8] De Jong, M. (2014) Arbitration of Family Separation Issues - A useful adjunct to Mediation and the Court Process PER/PELJ 2356.
[9] Edwards, P. (1990) Into the Abyss: How Party Autonomy Supports Overreaching through the Exercise of Unequal Bargaining Power. CUNY.
[10] Hichange Investments (Pty) Ltd v Cape Produce (2004) (2) SA 393.
[11] Joubert, J. (2014) Mediation Rules Finally Signed by Minister of Justice but Require Judicial Activism to get the System Going Legal Brief Today 28 January 2014.
[12] Lyster, R, (1993) Environmental Dispute Resolution, in Pretorius P (Ed), Dispute Resolution, Cape Town Wetton & Johannesburg: JUTA & Co Ltd pp145.
[13] Lyster, R, (1998) Should we Mediates Environmental Conflict: Justification for Negotiated Rulemaking, Sydney Law Review, Vol 25 (Electronic) Available: Westlaw 2017, May 10.
[14] Macfarlane J (1997) Rethinking Disputes: The mediation alternative. E Montgomery Publications pp. 392.
[15] Moore, S Defining “Successful’ Environmental Dispute Resolution; Case Studies from public land planning in the United States and Australia, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol 16 (1996) pp151-169 (Electronic} available: www.elsevier.com/locte/eiar (2017, May 09).
[16] National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998.
[17] O’Leary, R. and Bingham, L. (2003) The Promise and Performance of Environmental Conflict Resolution Washington, DC; Resources for the Future.
[18] Ryan, M. (1997) Alternative Dispute Resolution in Environmental Cases: Friend or Foe Tulane Environmental Journal Vol 10, Summer 1997 pp 397-415.
[19] Strukenborg, C. (1994) The Proper Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Environmental conflicts, University of Dayton Law Review, Vol 19 (1994) pp 1305-1339 (Electronic) 2017, 15 May.
[20] Thorpe, M. (1994) Statutory Arbitration in Ancillary Relief. CILSA 122.
[21] Tripp, T. B. J. and Alley, N. G. Streamlining NEPA’s Environmental Review Process: Suggestions For Agency Reform New York University Environmental Journal, Vol 12 pp 74-110 (Electronic) Available Westlaw, 2017, May 10.
[22] Tropill, A. T. (1991) Alternative dispute resolution in a contemporary South African context.
[23] Western Cape Minister of Education v Governing Body of Mikro Primary School (2005) ZASCA 60.