Wet Sliding Wear and Frictional Behavior of Commercially Available Perspex
Authors: S. Reaz Ahmed, M. S. Kaiser
Abstract:
The tribological behavior of commercially used Perspex was evaluated under dry and wet sliding condition using a pin-on-disc wear tester with different applied loads ranging from 2.5 to 20 N. Experiments were conducted with varying sliding distance from 0.2 km to 4.6 km, wherein the sliding velocity was kept constant, 0.64 ms-1. The results reveal that the weight loss increases with applied load and the sliding distance. The nature of the wear rate was very similar in both the sliding environments in which initially the wear rate increased very rapidly with increasing sliding distance and then progressed to a slower rate. Moreover, the wear rate in wet sliding environment was significantly lower than that under dry sliding condition. The worn surfaces were characterized by optical microscope and SEM. It is found that surface modification has significant effect on sliding wear performance of Perspex.
Keywords: Perspex, wear, friction, SEM.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132631
Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1196References:
[1] B. Aldousiri, A. Shalwan and C. W. Chin, “A review on tribological behaviour of polymeric composites and future reinforcements,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2013, no. 1-4, pp. 1-8, 2013.
[2] A. Madhanagopala and S. Gopalakannanb, “Dry slide wear behavior of graphite and SiC, TiO2 filled the unidirectional glass-epoxy composites,” Polymers and Polymer Composites, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 193-198, 2017.
[3] D. H. Buckley, “Investigation of wear phenomena by microscopy,” Journal of Microscopy, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 119-138, 1984.
[4] C. M. Pooley and D. Tabor, “Friction and molecular structure: the behaviour of some thermoplastics,” Proc. Roy. Soc., London, Series A, vol. 329, pp. 251-274, 1972.
[5] N. Koottathape, H. Takahashi, N. Iwasaki, M. Kanehira and W. J. Finger, “Morphological features of composite resin surfaces after two- and three-body wear simulation,” World Journal of Dentistry, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 221-228, 2012.
[6] A. Zmitrowicz, “Wear debris: a review of properties and constitutive model,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 3-35, 2005.
[7] J. F. Archard, Wear theory and mechanisms. Wear Control Handbook, ASME, New York, 1980.
[8] M. A. Chowdhury and M. M. Helali, “The effect of frequency of vibration and humidity on the coefficient of friction,” Tribology International, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 958-962, 2006.
[9] C. Suryanarayana, “Mechanical behavior of emerging materials,” materialstoday, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 486–498, 2012.
[10] C. Deo and S. H. Acharya, “Effects of fiber contenton abrasive wear of lantana camara fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite,” Indian Journal of Engineering Materials Sciences, vol.17, pp. 219-223, 2010.
[11] M. Singh, D. P. Mondal, R. Dasgupta, B. K. Prasad, A. K. Jha and A. H. Yegneswaran, “Effect of sillimanite particle reinforcement on dry sliding wear behaviour of aluminium alloy composite,” Materials Science and Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 303-312, 2003.
[12] A. R. Annappa, S. Basavarajappa and H. N. Ashoka, “Effect of soapstone filler on dry sliding wear behaviour of fiber reinforced polymeric composite,” International Journal of Plastics Technology, vol. 18, no.1, pp 146–156, 2014.
[13] D. M. Nuruzzaman and M. A. Chowdhury "Composites and Their Properties", book edited by Ning Hu, Publisher: InTech, 2012, Croatia, European Union
[14] K. Umanath, S.T. Selvamani, K. Palanikumar, T. Raphael and K. Prashanth, “Effect of sliding distance on dry sliding wear behaviour of Al6061/SiC/Al2O3 hybrid composite,” Proc. of Int. Conf. on Advances in Mechanical Engineering, AETAME, pp. 749-756, 2013.
[15] C. Zhu, O. Jacobs, R. Jaskulka, W. Koller and W. Wu, “Effect ofcounterpart material and water lubrication on the sliding wear performance of crosslinked and non-crosslinked ultra high molecular weight polyethylene,” Polymer Testing, vol. 23, pp. 665–673, 2004.
[16] B. N. J. Persson,1 U. Tartaglino,1,2,3 O. Albohr,4 and E. Tosatti, “Rubber friction on wet and dry road surfaces: The sealing effect,” Physical Review B, vol. 71, pp. 1-8, 2005.
[17] V. Bharathi, M. Ramachandra, and S. Srinivas, “Comparison of dry and wet sliding wear behavior of squeeze cast aluminum alloy,” Indian Journal of Advances in Chemical Science, Special Issue on Advanced Materials and Technology, pp. 101-106, 2016.
[18] L. McKeen, The Effect of UV light and weather on plastics and elastomers, 3rd Edition, 2013, Wilmington, DE, USA