Permeable Asphalt Pavement as a Measure of Urban Green Infrastructure in the Extreme Events Mitigation
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Permeable Asphalt Pavement as a Measure of Urban Green Infrastructure in the Extreme Events Mitigation

Authors: Márcia Afonso, Cristina Fael, Marisa Dinis-Almeida

Abstract:

Population growth in cities has led to an increase in the infrastructures construction, including buildings and roadways. This aspect leads directly to the soils waterproofing. In turn, changes in precipitation patterns are developing into higher and more frequent intensities. Thus, these two conjugated aspects decrease the rainwater infiltration into soils and increase the volume of surface runoff. The practice of green and sustainable urban solutions has encouraged research in these areas. The porous asphalt pavement, as a green infrastructure, is part of practical solutions set to address urban challenges related to land use and adaptation to climate change. In this field, permeable pavements with porous asphalt mixtures (PA) have several advantages in terms of reducing the runoff generated by the floods. The porous structure of these pavements, compared to a conventional asphalt pavement, allows the rainwater infiltration in the subsoil, and consequently, the water quality improvement. This green infrastructure solution can be applied in cities, particularly in streets or parking lots to mitigate the floods effects. Over the years, the pores of these pavements can be filled by sediment, reducing their function in the rainwater infiltration. Thus, double layer porous asphalt (DLPA) was developed to mitigate the clogging effect and facilitate the water infiltration into the lower layers. This study intends to deepen the knowledge of the performance of DLPA when subjected to clogging. The experimental methodology consisted on four evaluation phases of the DLPA infiltration capacity submitted to three precipitation events (100, 200 and 300 mm/h) in each phase. The evaluation first phase determined the behavior after DLPA construction. In phases two and three, two 500 g/m2 clogging cycles were performed, totaling a 1000 g/m2 final simulation. Sand with gradation accented in fine particles was used as clogging material. In the last phase, the DLPA was subjected to simple sweeping and vacuuming maintenance. A precipitation simulator, type sprinkler, capable of simulating the real precipitation was developed for this purpose. The main conclusions show that the DLPA has the capacity to drain the water, even after two clogging cycles. The infiltration results of flows lead to an efficient performance of the DPLA in the surface runoff attenuation, since this was not observed in any of the evaluation phases, even at intensities of 200 and 300 mm/h, simulating intense precipitation events. The infiltration capacity under clogging conditions decreased about 7% on average in the three intensities relative to the initial performance that is after construction. However, this was restored when subjected to simple maintenance, recovering the DLPA hydraulic functionality. In summary, the study proved the efficacy of using a DLPA when it retains thicker surface sediments and limits the fine sediments entry to the remaining layers. At the same time, it is guaranteed the rainwater infiltration and the surface runoff reduction and is therefore a viable solution to put into practice in permeable pavements.

Keywords: Clogging, double layer porous asphalt, infiltration capacity, rainfall intensity.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132609

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 967

References:


[1] W. Nie, Y. Yuan, W. Kepner, M. S. Nash, M. Jackson, C. Erickson, Assessing impacts of Landuse and Landcover changes on hydrology for the upper San Pedro watershed, J. Hydrol. 407 (2011) 105–114. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.07.012.
[2] M. Alsubih, S. Arthur, G. Wright, D. Allen, Experimental study on the hydrological performance of a permeable pavement, Urban Water J. 14 (2017) 427–434. doi:10.1080/1573062X.2016.1176221.
[3] J. Foster, A. Lowe, S. Winkelman, The Center for Clean Air Policy. The Value of Green Infrastructure for Urban Adaptation, Cent. Clean Air Policy. (2011) February 2011.
[4] M. L. Derkzen, A. J. A. van Teeffelen, P. H. Verburg, Green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation: How do residents’ views on climate impacts and green infrastructure shape adaptation preferences?, Landsc. Urban Plan. 157 (2017) 106–130. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.027.
[5] J. B. Ellis, Sustainable surface water management and green infrastructure in UK urban catchment planning, J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 56 (2013) 24–41. doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.648752.
[6] WAPA, Porous Asphalt Pavements, Wisconsin Asph. Pavement Assoc. (2015) 1–12.
[7] C. T. Andersen, I. D. L. Foster, C. J. Pratt, The role of urban surfaces ( permeable pavements ) in regulating drainage and evaporation : development of a laboratory simulation experiment, Hydrol. Process. 609 (1999) 597–609. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199903)13:4<597::AID-HYP756>3.3.CO;2-H.
[8] M. Legret, V. Colandini, C. L. Marc, Effects of a porous pavement with reservoir structure on the quality of runoff water and soil, Sci. Total Environ. 189/190 (1996) 335–340. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(96)05228-X.
[9] J. Stempihar, T. Pourshams-Manzouri, K. Kaloush, M. Rodezno, Porous Asphalt Pavement Temperature Effects for Urban Heat Island Analysis, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2293 (2012) 123–130. doi:10.3141/2293-15.
[10] W. James, H. Von Langsdorff, The use of permeable concrete block pavement in controlling environmental stressors in urban areas, 7th Int. Conf. Concr. Block Paving. (2003) 1–8. http://www.environmental-expert.com/Files/11067/articles/4871/027.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.icpi.org/sites/default/files/techpapers/1054.pdf.
[11] M. Scholz, P. Grabowiecki, Review of permeable pavement systems, Build. Environ. 42 (2007) 3830–3836. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.016.
[12] D. Pezzaniti, S. Beecham, J. Kandasamy, Influence of clogging on the effective life of permeable pavements, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. - Water Manag. 162 (2009) 211–220. doi:10.1680/wama.2009.00034.
[13] M. Kamali, M. Delkash, M. Tajrishy, Evaluation of permeable pavement responses to urban surface runoff, J. Environ. Manage. 187 (2017) 43–53. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.027.
[14] M. Kayhanian, D. Anderson, J. T. Harvey, D. Jones, B. Muhunthan, Permeability measurement and scan imaging to assess clogging of pervious concrete pavements in parking lots, J. Environ. Manage. 95 (2012) 114–123. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.021.
[15] E. Coleri, M. Kayhanian, J. T. Harvey, K. Yang, J. M. Boone, Clogging evaluation of open graded friction course pavements tested under rainfall and heavy vehicle simulators, J. Environ. Manage. 129 (2013) 164–172. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.005.
[16] C. F. Yong, A. Deletic, T. D. Fletcher, M. R. Grace, The clogging behaviour and treatment efficiency of a range of porous pavements, 11th Int. Conf. Urban Drain. (2008) 1–12.
[17] N. Abdul Hassan, N. A. Mohamed Abdullah, N. A. Mohd Shukry, M. Z. H. Mahmud, N. Z. Mohd Yunus, R. Putrajaya, M. R. Hainin, H. Yaacob, Laboratory evaluation on the effect of clogging on permeability of porous asphalt mixtures, J. Teknol. 76 (2015) 77–84. doi:10.11113/jt.v76.5846.
[18] F. G. Praticò, R. Vaiana, Improving infrastructure sustainability in suburban and urban areas: Is porous asphalt the right answer? And how?, WIT Trans. Built Environ. 128 (2012) 673–684. doi:10.2495/UT120571.
[19] M. Liu, X. Huang, G. Xue, Effects of double layer porous asphalt pavement of urban streets on noise reduction, Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 5 (2016) 183–196. doi:10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.02.001.
[20] J.-D. Baladès, M. Legret, H. Madiec, Permeable pavements: Pollution management tools, Water Sci. Technol. 32 (1995) 49–56. doi:10.1016/0273-1223(95)00537-W.
[21] M. L. Afonso, M. Dinis-Almeida, C. S. Fael, Study of the porous asphalt performance with cellulosic fibres, Constr. Build. Mater. 135 (2017) 104–111. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.222.
[22] T. D. Fletcher, H. Andrieu, P. Hamel, Understanding, management and modelling of urban hydrology and its consequences for receiving waters: A state of the art, Adv. Water Resour. 51 (2013) 261–279. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.09.001.
[23] N. R. Siriwardene, A. Deletic, T. D. Fletcher, Clogging of stormwater gravel infiltration systems and filters: Insights from a laboratory study, Water Res. 41 (2007) 1433–1440. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.12.040.
[24] D. Castro, N. González-Angullo, J. Rodríguez, M. A. Calzada, The influence of paving-block shape on the infiltration capacity of permeable paving, L. Contam. Reclam. 15 (2007) 335–344. doi:10.2462/09670513.855.
[25] T. Iserloh, J. B. Ries, J. Arnáez, C. Boix-Fayos, V. Butzen, A. Cerdà, M. T. Echeverría, J. Fernández-Gálvez, W. Fister, C. Geißler, J.A. Gómez, H. Gómez-Macpherson, N. J. Kuhn, R. Lázaro, F. J. León, M. Martínez-Mena, J.F. Martínez-Murillo, M. Marzen, M.D. Mingorance, L. Ortigosa, P. Peters, D. Regüés, J. D. Ruiz-Sinoga, T. Scholten, M. Seeger, A. Solé-Benet, R. Wengel, S. Wirtz, European small portable rainfall simulators: A comparison of rainfall characteristics, Catena. 110 (2013) 100–112. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2013.05.013.
[26] M. Lora, M. Camporese, P. Salandin, Design and performance of a nozzle-type rainfall simulator for landslide triggering experiments, Catena. 140 (2016) 77–89. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2016.01.018.
[27] J. L. Merriam, J. Keller, Farm irrigation system evaluation: A guide for management, 3rd ed., United States of America, Logan, Utah, 1978. http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/29886468.