Exploring the Situational Approach to Decision Making: User eConsent on a Health Social Network

Authors: W. Rowan, Y. O’Connor, L. Lynch, C. Heavin

Abstract:

Situation Awareness can offer the potential for conscious dynamic reflection. In an era of online health data sharing, it is becoming increasingly important that users of health social networks (HSNs) have the information necessary to make informed decisions as part of the registration process and in the provision of eConsent. This research aims to leverage an adapted Situation Awareness (SA) model to explore users’ decision making processes in the provision of eConsent. A HSN platform was used to investigate these behaviours. A mixed methods approach was taken. This involved the observation of registration behaviours followed by a questionnaire and focus group/s. Early results suggest that users are apt to automatically accept eConsent, and only later consider the long-term implications of sharing their personal health information. Further steps are required to continue developing knowledge and understanding of this important eConsent process. The next step in this research will be to develop a set of guidelines for the improved presentation of eConsent on the HSN platform.

Keywords: eConsent, health social network, mixed methods, situation awareness.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132597

References:

[1] Söller, A. Bröder, A & Hilbig, B.E. “Deliberation versus automaticity in decision making: Which presentation format features facilitate automatic decision making?” Judgement and Decision Making, Vol. 8. No.3. May 2013, pp. 278-298.
[2] Endsley, M.R. “Toward a theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems”. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomic Society, 37(1), 1995 pp. 32-64.
[3] Mangold, W.G. & Faulds, D.J. “Social Media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix”. Business Horizons, 52(4), 2009. Pp.357-365.
[4] Li, J. “Privacy policies for health social networking sites.” Journal of American Medical Informatics Association, 20(4), 2013. Pp.704-707.
[5] Singh, H. Peterson, L.A. & Thomas, E.J. “Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: A lesson from Aviation.” Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15(3), 2006, pp.159-164.
[6] Sarter, N.B. & Woods, D.D. “Situation awareness – a critical but ill-defined phenomenon.” International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 1, 1991, pp.45-57.
[7] Wicks, P. Massagli, M. Frost, J. Brownstein, C. Okun, S. Vaughan, T., … Heywood, J. “Sharing health data for better outcomes on PatientsLikeMe.” Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(2), e19, 2010.
[8] McKee, R. “Ethical issues in using social media for health and health care research.” Health Policy, 110(2), 2013. Pp.298-301.
[9] Barnes, S.B. “A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States.” First Monday, 11(9), 2006.
[10] O’Connor, Y. & Heavin, C. “Predicting Decision Autonomy through Situated Awareness: Towards a better understanding of Informed Consent on Health Social Networking Sites (HSNs). Unpublished.
[11] Angwin, J. 2014, “Dragnet Nation: A Quest for Privacy, Security and Freedom in a World of Relentless Surveillance”: Chapter1: Hacked. Colo. Tech. LJ, 12. 291.
[12] Asiri, E. Asiri, H. & Househ, M.S. “Exploring the concepts of privacy and the sharing of sensitive health information”. Paper presented at the ICIMTH, 2014.
[13] Li, J.S. Zhou, T.S. Chu, J. Araki, K. & Yoshihara, H. “Design and development on an international clinical data exchange system: The international layer function of the Dolphin Project.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 18(5), 2011. Pp.683-689.
[14] Faresi, A.A. Alazzawe, A. & Alazzawe, A. “Privacy leakage in Health Social Networks.” Computational Intelligence, 30(3), 2014. Pp.514-534.
[15] Cushman, R. Froomkin, A.M. Cava, A. Abril, P. & Goodman, K.W. “Ethical, legal and social issues for personal health records and applications.” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43(5), 2010. Pp S51-S55.
[16] Torabi, S. & Beznosov, K. “Sharing Health Information on Facebook: Practices, Preferences, and Risk Perceptions of North American Users”. Paper presented at the Twelfth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) 2016.
[17] Van Der Velden, M. & El Emam, K. “Not all my friends need to know: A qualitative study of teenage patients, privacy, and social media.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(1), 2013. Pp.16-24.
[18] Hochhauser, M. “EConsent: Ten usability issues.” Society of Clinical Research Associates, 68, May 2015.
[19] Kahneman, D. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
[20] Pool, M. M. “Personal Health Information Shared via Social Networking: The Gap between Reality and Protection”. Case W. Res. JL Tech. & Internet, 4, 411, 2012.
[21] Salovaara, A. Oulasvirta, A. & Jacucci, G. “The panopticon: A method for observing inter-group interactions.” In CHI’06 Workshop on Reality Testing, 2006.
[22] Hughes, C.T. & Gibson, M.L. “Students as surrogates for managers in a decision-making environment: An experimental study”. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8(2), 1991. Pp.153-166.
[23] Briggs, R. O. Balthazard, P.A. & Dennis, A.R. “Graduate business students as surrogates for executives in the evaluation of technology.” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC) 8(4) 1996. Pp.11-19.
[24] Guimond, M. Sole, M. & Salas, E. “TeamSTEPS – An educational program seeks to improve teamwork and ultimately patient safety.” American Journal of Nursing, 109(11), 2009. Pp.66-68.
[25] Salmon, P.M. Stanton, N.A. Walker, G.H. Barber, C. Jenkins, D.P. McMaster, R. & Young, M.S. “What is really going on? Review of Situation Awareness models for individuals and teams.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9:4, 2008. Pp.297-323.
[26] Braithwaite, J. Healy, J. & Dwan, K. The Governance of Health Safety and Quality. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. 2005.
[27] Smith, K. & Hancock, P.A. “Situation Awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness.” Human Factors, 37, 1995. Pp.137-148.