Key Issues in Transfer Stage of BOT Project: Experience from China

Authors: Wang Liguang, Zhang Xueqing

Abstract:

The build-operate-transfer (BOT) project delivery system has provided effective routes to mobilize private sector funds, innovative technologies, management skills and operational efficiencies for public infrastructure development and have been widely used in China during the last 20 years. Many BOT projects in China will be smoothly transferred to the government soon and the transfer stage, which is considered as the last stage, must be studied carefully and handled well to achieve the overall success of BOT projects. There will be many issues faced by both the public sector and private sector in the transfer stage of BOT projects, including project post-assessment, technology and documents transfer, personal training and staff transition, etc. and sometimes additional legislation is needed for future operation and management of facilities. However, most previous studies focused on the bidding, financing, and building and operation stages instead of transfer stage. This research identifies nine key issues in the transfer stage of BOT projects through a comprehensive study on three cases in China, and the expert interview and expert discussion meetings are held to validate the key issues and give detail analysis. A proposed framework of transfer management is prepared based on the experiences derived and lessons drawn from the case studies and expert interview and discussions, which is expected to improve the transfer management of BOT projects in practice.

Keywords: BOT project, key issues, transfer management transfer stage.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132339

References:

[1] Castro, D. De, Cruz, C. O., Rodrigues, F., and Silva, P. (2016). “Bibliometric Analysis of PPP and PFI Literature: Overview of 25 Years of Research.” 142(2004), 1–8.
[2] Kumaraswamy, M. M., and Zhang, X. Q. (2001). “Governmental role in BOT-led infrastructure development.” International Journal of Project Management, 19(4), 195–205.
[3] Tiong, R. L. K. (1990). “BOT projects: Risks and securities.” Construction Management and Economics, 8(3), 315–328.
[4] Zhang, X. Q., and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2001). “Hong Kong Experience in Managing BOT Projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, March/Apri(April), 154–162.
[5] Li, G. (2011). “Risk Analysis for Transfer Stage of BOT Projects.” Co-operative Economy & Science, 12, 60–61.
[6] Yuan, J., Chan, A. P. C., Xiong, W., Skibniewski, M. J., and Li, Q. (2009). “Perception of Residual Value Risk in Public Private Partnership Projects: Critical Review.” Journal of Management in Engineering, 31(Hall 1998), 1–15.
[7] Zhang, J. S., Peng, J. A., and Wang, Q. (2003). “Issues and Preventive Measures in Transfer Stage of BOT Projects in China.” China Opening Herald, 7, 44–45.
[8] Chen, C., and Doloi, H. (2008). “BOT application in China: Driving and impeding factors.” International Journal of Project Management, 26(4), 388–398.
[9] Qiao, L., Wang, S., Tiong, R. L. K., and Chan, T.-S. (2002). “Critical success factors for tendering BOT infrastructure projects in China.” Journal of Structured and Project Finance.
[10] Schaufelberger, J. E., and Wipadapisut, I. (2003). “Alternate Financing Strategies for Build-Operate-Transfer Projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(2), 205–213.
[11] Wang, S. Q., Tiong, R. L. K., Ting, S. K., Chew, D., and Ashley, D. (1998). “Evaluation and competitive tendering of BOT power plant project in China.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-Asce, 124(4), 333–341.