Geotechnical Design of Bridge Foundations and Approaches in Hilly Granite Formation
Commenced in January 2007
Frequency: Monthly
Edition: International
Paper Count: 33122
Geotechnical Design of Bridge Foundations and Approaches in Hilly Granite Formation

Authors: Q. J. Yang

Abstract:

This paper presents a case study of geotechnical design of bridge foundations and approaches in hilly granite formation in northern New South Wales of Australia. Firstly, the geological formation and existing cut slope conditions which have high risks of rock fall will be described. The bridge has three spans to be constructed using balanced cantilever method with a middle span of 150 m. After concept design option engineering, it was decided to change from pile foundation to pad footing with ground anchor system to optimize the bridge foundation design. The geotechnical design parameters were derived after two staged site investigations. The foundation design was carried out to satisfy both serviceability limit state and ultimate limit state during construction and in operation. It was found that the pad footing design was governed by serviceability limit state design loading cases. The design of bridge foundation also considered presence of weak rock layer intrusion and a layer of “no core” to ensure foundation stability. The precast mass concrete block system was considered for the retaining walls for the bridge approaches to resolve the constructability issue over hilly terrain. The design considered the retaining wall block sliding stability, while the overturning and internal stabilities are satisfied.

Keywords: Pad footing, hilly formation, stability, block works.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132114

Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 1618

References:


[1] Douglas Partners, “Report on Ground Investigation, Bolivia Hill Upgrade,” Report Ref. 81634.01. R.001. Rev 3, June 2016.
[2] Douglas Partners, “Data Report on Ground Investigation, Proposed Bolivia Hill Upgrade,” Report Ref. 81634.00. R.001. Rev 1, February 2015.
[3] Arcadis Australia Pacific, Geotechnical Interpretative Report, Bolivia Hill Upgrade, New England Highway, Design Report No. F0026-AA006996-AAR-01, June 2016.
[4] Arcadis Australia Pacific, Geotechnical Design Report, Bolivia Hill Upgrade, New England Highway, Design Report No. F0032-AA006996-AAR-02, September 2016.
[5] T. Y. Irfan and G. E. Powell, Foundation Design of Caissons on Granite and Volcanic Rocks, GEO Report No 8, Geotechnical Engineering Office, Hong Kong, Nov. 1991.
[6] Arcadis Australia Pacific, Design Drawing Sets ST1 for Bridge, ST2, ST3 and ST4 for Bolivia Hill Upgrade, September 2016.
[7] Arcadis Australia Pacific, Design Drawing Sets ST2, ST3 and ST4 Bridge Approaches and miscellaneous structures for Bolivia Hill Upgrade, September 2016.
[8] British Standard, Strengthened / reinforced soil and other fills. Code of Practice, the United Kingdom, Nov. 1995.
[9] G. S. Pettifer and P. G. Fookes, “A revision of graphical method for assessing the excavatability of rock”, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, Vol. 27, No. 2, May 1994, pp145-164.