The Influence of Travel Experience within Perceived Public Transport Quality

Authors: Armando Cartenì, Ilaria Henke

Abstract:

The perceived public transport quality is an important driver that influences both customer satisfaction and mobility choices. The competition among transport operators needs to improve the quality of the services and identify which attributes are perceived as relevant by passengers. Among the “traditional” public transport quality attributes there are, for example: travel and waiting time, regularity of the services, and ticket price. By contrast, there are some “non-conventional” attributes that could significantly influence customer satisfaction jointly with the “traditional” ones. Among these, the beauty/aesthetics of the transport terminals (e.g. rail station and bus terminal) is probably one of the most impacting on user perception. Starting from these considerations, the point stressed in this paper was if (and how munch) the travel experience of the overall travel (e.g. how long is the travel, how many transport modes must be used) influences the perception of the public transport quality. The aim of this paper was to investigate the weight of the terminal quality (e.g. aesthetic, comfort and service offered) within the overall travel experience. The case study was the extra-urban Italian bus network. The passengers of the major Italian terminal bus were interviewed and the analysis of the results shows that about the 75% of the travelers, are available to pay up to 30% more for the ticket price for having a high quality terminal. A travel experience effect was observed: the average perceived transport quality varies with the characteristic of the overall trip. The passengers that have a “long trip” (travel time greater than 2 hours) perceived as “low” the overall quality of the trip even if they pass through a high quality terminal. The opposite occurs for the “short trip” passengers. This means that if a traveler passes through a high quality station, the overall perception of that terminal could be significantly reduced if he is tired from a long trip. This result is important and if confirmed through other case studies, will allow to conclude that the “travel experience impact" must be considered as an explicit design variable for public transport services and planning.

Keywords: Transportation planning, sustainable mobility, decision support system, discrete choice model, design problem.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1132082

References:

[1] E. Cascetta, A. Cartenì, A quality-based approach to public transportation planning: theory and a case study, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 8, 1, (2014).
[2] E. Cascetta, A. Cartenì, A. Carbone, The quality in public transportation. The campania regional metro system” “La progettazione quality-based nel trasporto pubblico locale. Il sistema di metropolitana regionale delia Campani, Ingegneria Ferroviaria, 68 (3), pp. 241-261, (2013).
[3] E. Cascetta, A. Cartenì, M. Montanino, A behavioral model of accessibility based on the number of available opportunities, Journal of Transport Geography 51, pp. 45–58, (2016).
[4] A. Cartenì, Accessibility indicators for freight transport terminals, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 39, 11, pp. 7647-7660, (2014).
[5] M. Bordagaray, L. dell'Olio, A. Ibeas, P. Cecín, P., Modelling user perception of bus transit quality considering user and service heterogeneity ,Transport Science, 10,8, (2014).
[6] A. Cartenì, Urban sustainable mobility Part 1, Transport Problems, 9, 4, (2014).
[7] A. Cartenì, Urban sustainable mobility. Part 2, Transport Problems, 10, 1; (2015)
[8] A. Cartenì, L. Pariota, I. Henke, Hedonic value of High-Speed Rail services: quantitative analysis of the domestic tourist attractiveness of the main Italian cities; Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 100, pp. 348-365, (2017).
[9] A. Cartenì, L. Pariota, I. Henke, Gli effetti dell'alta velocità ferroviaria sull'attrattività turistica delie principali città italiane, Ingegneria Ferroviaria, 71,3, (2016).
[10] C.-H. Wen, L.W. Lan, C.-H Chen, Passengers Perception on Service Quality and their Choice for Intercity Bus Services, Transportation Research Board, 84 (2005).
[11] L. dell’Olio, A. Ibeas, P. Cecín; Modelling User Perception of Bus Transit Quality, Transport Policy 17, 6, (2010).
[12] L. dell’Olio, A. Ibeas, P. Cecín, The Quality of Service Desired by Public Transport Users, Transport Policy 18, 1, (2011).
[13] L. Eboli, G. Mazzulla, An SP Experiment for Measuring Service Quality in Public Transport, Transportation Planning and Technology 31,5, (2008).
[14] A. Nkurunziza, M. Zuidgeest, M. Brussel, F. VandenBosch, Spatial Variation of Transit Service Quality Preferences in Dar-es-salaam, Journal of Transport Geography 24, (2012).
[15] D.A. Hensher, P. Prioni, A service quality index for area-wide contract performance assessment regime, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 36,1, (2002).
[16] E. Cascetta, A. Cartenì, I. Henke, Stations quality, aesthetics and attractiveness of rail transport: empirical evidence and mathematical models (Qualità delle stazioni, estetica e attrattività del trasporto ferroviario: evidenze empiriche e modelli matematici), Ingegneria Ferroviaria, 69 (4), pp. 307-32, (2014).
[17] A. Cartenì, G. Galante, I. Henke, The catchment area of high architectural railway stations: An application of the Graham scan algorithm, WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 135, pp. 463 – 474, (2014).
[18] E. Cascetta, A. Cartenì, The hedonic value of railways terminals. A quantitative analysis of the impact of stations quality on travellers behaviour, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 61, (2014).
[19] S. Hernandez, A. Monzon, R. de Oña, Urban transport interchanges: A methodology for evaluating perceived quality, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 84, (2016).
[20] http://www.panynj.gov/wtcprogress/transportation-hub.html, last access July 2017.
[21] https://www.ourvadodara.com, last access July 2017.
[22] http://www.designcurial.com/news/the-worlds-10-best-designed-bus-stations-2016-4823398/5, last access July 2017.
[23] http://blunck-morgen.de/zob_hh.html, last access July 2017.
[24] http://wikimapia.org/3856397/it/Gare-do-Oriente, last access July 2017.
[25] A. Cartenì, I. Henke, Public transport quality and travel experience: the Italian case study. European Scientific Journal (ESJ), (2017).
[26] http://walyou.com, last access July 2017.
[27] http://www.knstrct.com/home, last access July 2017.
[28] E. Cascetta, A. Cartenì, F. Pagliara, M. Montanino, A new look at planning and designing transportation systems as decision-making processes, Transport Policy 38, (2015).
[29] A. Cartenì, I. Henke: “External costs estimation in a cost-benefit analysis: the new Formia-Gaeta tourist railway line in Italy”, proceeding of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering, Milan, Italy, (2017).
[30] A. Cartenì, E. Cascetta, S. de Luca, A random utility model for park & carsharing services and the pure preference for electric vehicles, Transport Policy 48, (2016).