Persuasive Communication on Social Egg Freezing in California from a Framing Theory Perspective

Authors: Leila Mohammadi

Abstract:

This paper presents the impact of persuasive communication implemented by fertility clinics websites, and how this information influences women at their decision-making for undertaking this procedure. The influential factors for women decisions to do social egg freezing (SEF) are analyzed from a framing theory perspective, with a specific focus on the impact of persuasive information on women’s decision making. This study follows a quantitative approach. A two-phase survey has been conducted to examine the interest rate to undertake SEF. In the first phase, a questionnaire was available during a month (May 2015) to women to answer whether or not they knew enough information of this process, with a total of 230 answers. The second phase took place in the two last weeks of July 2015. All the respondents were invited to a seminars called ‘All about egg freezing’ and afretwards they were requested to answer the second questionnaire. After the seminar, in which they were given an extensive amount of information about egg freezing, a total of 115 women replied the questionnaire. The collected data during this process were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Most of the respondents changed their opinion in the second questionaire which was after receiving information. Although in the first questionnaire their self-evaluation of having knowledge about this process and the implemented technologies was very high, they realized that they still need to access more information from different sources in order to be able to make a decision. The study reached the conclusion that persuasive and framed information by clinics would affect the decisions of these women. Despite the reasons women have to do egg freezing and their motivations behind it, providing people necessary information and unprejudiced data about this process (such as its positive and negative aspects, requirements, suppositions, possibilities and consequences) would help them to make a more precise and reasonable decision about what they are buying.

Keywords: Decision making, fertility clinics, framing theory, persuasive information, social egg freezing.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1131872

References:

[1] Baldwin, K., Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Mitchell, H. (2014). Reproductive technology and the life course: current debates and research in social egg freezing. Human Fertility, 17(3), 170-179.
[2] Inhorn, M. C., & Patrizio, P. (2015). Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Human reproduction update, dmv016.
[3] Martin, J., Hamilton, B., Osterman, M., Driscoll, A., Mathews, T., (2017, January 5) National Vital Statistics Reports. Births: final data for 2015. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr66/nvsr66_01.pdf, Accessed April/ 25/2017
[4] Mertes, H., Pennings, G., Dondorp, W., & Wert, G. d. (2012). Implications of oocyte cryostorage for the practice of oocyte donation. Human reproduction, 27(10), 2886-2893. doi:10.1093/humrep/des250
[5] Noyes, N., Porcu, E., & Borini, A. (2009). Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reproductive biomedicine online, 18(6), 769-776. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60025-9
[6] Rudick, B., Opper, N., Paulson, R., Bendikson, K., & Chung, K. (2010). The status of oocyte cryopreservation in the United States. Fertility and sterility, 94(7), 2642-2646. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.079
[7] Moss , B . (2011) . The annual Red Magazine Fertility Report 2011 .Available at: /news/editor-s. Retrieved March 14,2013 from http://www.redonline.co.uk
[8] Martinez, G. M., Chandra, A., Abma, J. C., Jones, J., & Mosher, W. D. (2006). Fertility, contraception, and fatherhood: data on men and women from cycle 6 (2002) of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (Vol. 23). National Center for Health Statistics.
[9] Proudfoot, S., Wellings, K., & Glasier, A. (2009). Analysis why nulliparous women over age 33 wish to use contraception. Contraception, 79(2), 98-104. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.09.005
[10] Cooke, A., Mills, T. A., & Lavender, T. (2010). ‘Informed and uninformed decision making’—Women's reasoning, experiences and perceptions with regard to advanced maternal age and delayed childbearing: A meta-synthesis. International journal of nursing studies, 47(10), 1317-1329. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.001
[11] Mills, M., Rindfuss, R. R., McDonald, P., & Velde, E. T. (2011). Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Human reproduction update, 17(6), 848-860. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr026
[12] Baldwin, K., Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Mitchell, H. (2014). Reproductive technology and the life course: current debates and research in social egg freezing. Human Fertility, 17(3), 170-179. doi:10.3109/14647273.2014.939723
[13] Bernstein, S., & Wiesemann, C. (2014). Should Postponing Motherhood via “Social Freezing” Be Legally Banned? An Ethical Analysis. Laws, 3(2), 282-300. doi:10.3390/laws3020282
[14] Goold, I. & Savulescu, J. (2009). In Favour of Freezing Eggs for Non‐Medical Reasons. Bioethics, 23(1), 47-58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00679.x
[15] Mertes, H., & Pennings, G. (2011). Social egg freezing: for better, not for worse. Reproductive biomedicine online, 23(7), 824-829. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.09.010
[16] Office for National Statistics. (2013). Statistical bulletin: Live Births in England and Wales by Characteristics of Mother 1 2012. ONS. Retrieved February 2, 2016, from http://www.ons.gov.uk
[17] Rendall, M., Couer, C., Lappegard, T., Robert-Bobée, I., Ronsen, M., & Smallwood, S. (2005). First births by age and education in Britain, France and Norway. POPULATION TRENDS-LONDON-, 121(27).
[18] Ní Bhrolcháin, M., & Toulemon, L. (2005). Does postponement explain the trend to later childbearing in France? Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 83-107.
[19] Harwood, K. (2009). Egg freezing: a breakthrough for reproductive autonomy? Bioethics, 23(1), 39-46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00680.x
[20] Myrskylä, M., & Margolis, R. (2014). Happiness: Before and after the kids. Demography, 51(5), 1843-1866. doi:10.1007/s13524-014-0321-x
[21] Dondorp, W. J., & De Wert., G. M. (2009). Fertility preservation for healthy women: ethical aspects. Human Reproduction, 24(8), 1779-1785. doi:10.1093/humrep/dep102
[22] Benzies, K., Tough, S., Tofflemire, K., Frick, C., Faber, A., & Newburn‐Cook, C. (2006). Factors influencing women’s decisions about timing of motherhood. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 35(5), 625-633. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00079.x
[23] Schuman, L., Witkin, G., Copperman, K., & Greca, M. A.-L. (2011). Psychology of egg freezing patients: would they consider single motherhood? Fertility and Sterility, 96(3), S206. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.07.799
[24] Bunting, L., & Boivin, J. (2008). Knowledge about infertility risk factors, fertility myths and illusory benefits of healthy habits in young people. Human Reproduction, 23(8), 1858-1864. doi:10.1093/humrep/den168
[25] Maheshwari, A., Hamilton, M., & Bhattacharya., S. (2008). Effect of female age on the diagnostic categories of infertility. Human reproduction, 23(3), 538-542. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem431
[26] Bretherick, K. L., Fairbrother, N., Avila, L., Harbord, S. H., & Robinson, W. P. (2010). Fertility and aging: do reproductive-aged Canadian women know what they need to know? Fertility and sterility, 93(7), 2162-2168. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.064
[27] Daniluk, J. C., & Koert, E. (2013). The other side of the fertility coin: a comparison of childless men’s and women’s knowledge of fertility and assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and sterility, 99(3), 839-846. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.10.033
[28] Daniluk, J. C., & Koert., E. (2015). Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Human Reproduction, 30(2), 353-363. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu328
[29] Gammeltoft, T. M., & Wahlberg, A. (2014). Selective reproductive technologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 43, 201-216. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030424
[30] Moll, T. (2015). Biological relatives: IVF, stem cells, and the future of kinship. Anthropology Southern Africa, 38(1-2), 149-151. doi:10.1080/23323256.2015.1030435
[31] Van Loendersloot, L. L., Moolenaar, L. M., Mol, B. W., Repping, S., Veen, F. v., & Goddijn, M. (2011). Expanding reproductive lifespan: a cost-effectiveness study on oocyte freezing. Human reproduction, der284. doi:10.1093/humrep/der284
[32] Devine, K., Mumford, S., Hodes-Wertz, B., Druckenmiller, S., Propst, A., & Noyes, N. N. (2012). Baby budgeting: a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of elective oocyte cryopreservation (EOC) as a means to increase live birth rates (LBR) in women delayingreproduction. Fertility and Sterility, 98(3), S7-S8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.028
[33] Hirshfeld-Cytron, J., Grobman, W. A., & Milad, M. P. (2012). Fertility preservation for social indications: a cost-based decision analysis. Fertility and sterility, 97(3), 665-670. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.029
[34] Mertes, H., & Pennings, G. (2012). Elective oocyte cryopreservation: who should pay? Human reproduction, 27(1), 9-13. doi:10.1093/humrep/der364
[35] Bittner, U. (2009). A reply to Karey Harwood. Bioethics, 23(9), 525-525. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01751.x
[36] Petropanagos, A. (2010). Reproductive ‘choice’and egg freezing. In In Oncofertility (Vol. 156, pp. 223-235). Springer US.
[37] Rybak, E. A., & Lieman, H. J. (2009). Egg freezing, procreative liberty, and ICSI: the double standards confronting elective self-donation of oocytes. Fertility and sterility, 92(5), 1509-1512. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.008
[38] Homburg, R., Veen, F. v., & Silber, S. J. (2009). Oocyte vitrification—women's emancipation set in stone. Fertility and sterility, 91(4), 1319-1320. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.127
[39] Soliman, H. H., Khaki, A. A., Al-Azawi, T., & Al-Hasani, S. (2012). Oocyte cryopreservation, will it be a real social choice and family solution? Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 17(1), 8-11. doi:10.1016/j.mefs.2012.01.003
[40] Shkedi-Rafid, S., & Hashiloni-Dolev, Y. (2011). Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion. Journal of medical ethics (2011), medethics-2011.
[41] De Sutter, P., Gerris, J., & Dhont, M. (2008). Assisted reproductive technologies: how to minimize the risks and complications in developing countries?. ESHRE Monographs 2008, 2008(1), 73-76. doi:10.1093/humrep/den160
[42] Grynberg, M. (2013). Is Oocyte Cryopreservation for Social Reasons Ethically Defendable. Against. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Social Egg Freezing, (pp. 60-5). Barcelona.
[43] Delvigne, A. (2009). Epidemiology of OHSS. Reproductive biomedicine online, 19(1), 8-13. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60040-5
[44] Wang, C. T., Liang, L., Witz, C., Williams, D., Griffith, J., Skorupski, J., . . . Wang, W. (2013). Optimized protocol for cryopreservation of human eggs improves developmental competence and implantation of resulting embryos. Journal of ovarian research, 6(1), 1. doi:10.1186/1757-2215-6-15
[45] Cobo, A., Kuwayama, M., Pérez, S., Ruiz, A., Pellicer, A., & Remohí, J. (2008). Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertility and sterility, 89(6), 1657-1664. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.050
[46] Rienzi, L., Cobo, A., Paffoni, A., Scarduelli, C., Capalbo, A., Vajta, G., . . . Ubaldi, F. M. (2012). Consistent and predictable delivery rates after oocyte vitrification: an observational longitudinal cohort multicentric study. Human reproduction, 27(6), 1606-1612. doi:10.1093/humrep/des088
[47] Dobrzykowski, T., & Noerager Stern, P (2003). Out of sync: A generation of first-time mothers over 30. Health Care for Women International, 24(3), 242-253. doi:10.1080/07399330390183552
[48] Klein, J., Howard, M., Grunfeld, L., Mukherjee, T., Sandler, B., & Copperman, a. A. (2006). "P-486: preliminary experience of an oocyte cryopreservation program: are patients presenting too late? Fertility and Sterility, 86(3), S315. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.849
[49] Gold, E., Copperman, K., Witkin, G., Jones, C., & Copperman, A. B. (2006). P-187: a motivational assessment of women undergoing elective egg freezing for fertility preservation. Fertility and Sterility, 86(3), S201. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.537
[50] Nekkebroeck, J., Stoop, D., & Devroey, P. (2010). A preliminary profile of women opting for oocyte cryopreservation for non-medical reasons. Human Reproduction, 25, 14-17.
[51] Schuman, L., Witkin, G., Copperman, K., Acosta, M., Barritt, J., & Copperman, A. B. (2012). Women Pursuing Non-Medical Oocyte Cryopreservation Share Information About Their Treatment With Family and Friends. Fertility and Sterility, 97(3), S12-S13. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.01.029
[52] Lockwood, G. M. (2011). Social egg freezing: the prospect of reproductive ‘immortality’or a dangerous delusion? Reproductive biomedicine online, 23(3), 334-340. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.05.010
[53] Tydén, T., Svanberg, A. S., Karlström, P.-O., Lihoff, L., & Lampic, C. (2006). Female university students' attitudes to future motherhood and their understanding about fertility. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 11(3), 181-189. doi:10.1080/13625180600557803
[54] Tough, S., Benzies, K., Fraser-Lee, N., & Newburn-Cook, C. (2007). Factors influencing childbearing decisions and knowledge of perinatal risks among Canadian men and women. Maternal and child health journal, 11(2), 189-198.
[55] Daniluk, J. C., & des190., E. K. (2012). Childless Canadian men's and women's childbearing intentions, attitudes towards and willingness to use assisted human reproduction. Human reproduction. doi:10.1093/humrep/des190
[56] McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York: Mentor in Levinson, Paul (2000),“McLuhan and Media Ecology”. Proceedings of Media Ecology Association, 1.
[57] Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. University of California Press.
[58] Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
[59] Schramm, W. (1971). The nature of communication between humans. The process and effects of mass communication, 3-53.
[60] Wicks, R. H. (2005). Message framing and constructing meaning: An emerging paradigm in mass communication research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 29(1), 335-362.
[61] Maher, T. M. (2001). Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting. Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, 83-94.
[62] Entman, R. (1993). Framing - toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
[63] Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). McGraw-Hill series in social psychology. Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
[64] Zhou, Y., & Moy, P. (2007). Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 79-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00330.x
[65] Peng, W., & Tang, L. (2010). Health content in Chinese newspapers. Journal of Health Communication, 15(7), 695-711. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.514028
[66] Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149-188. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
[67] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. (pp. 99-127).
[68] Avraham, S., Machtinger, R., Cahan, T., Sokolov, A., Racowsky, C., & Seidman, D. (2014). What is the quality of information on social oocyte cryopreservation provided by websites of society for assisted reproductive technology member fertility clinics? Fertility and Sterility, 101(1), 222-226. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.008
[69] Jain, T., & Barbieri, R. L. (2005). Website quality assessment: Mistaking apples for oranges. Fertility and Sterility, 83(3), 545-547. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.09.030
[70] Huang, J. Y. J., Discepola, F., & Tulandi, T. (2005). A call for standardization of fertility clinic websites. Fertility and Sterility, 83(3), 556-557. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.024
[71] Huang, J. Y. J., Discepola, F., Al-Fozan, H., & Tulandi, T. (2005). Quality of fertility clinic websites. Fertility and Sterility, 83(3), 538-544. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.08.036
[72] Abusief, M. E., Hornstein, M. D., & Jain, T. (2007). Assessment of united states fertility clinic websitesaccording to the american society for reproductive medicine guidelines. Fertility and Sterility, 87(1), 88. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.073
[73] Omurtag, K., Jimenez, P., Ratts, V., Odem, R., & Cooper, A. (2012). The ART of social networking: How SART member clinics are connecting with patients online. Fertility and Sterility, 97(1), 88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.001.