An Efficiency Measurement of E-Government Performance for United Nation Ranking Index
In order to serve the society in an electronic manner, many developing countries have launched tremendous e-government projects. The strategies of development and implementation e-government system have reached different levels, and to ensure consistency of development, the governments need to evaluate e-government performance. The United nation has design e-government development ranking index (EGDI) that rely on three indexes, Online service index (OSI), Telecommunication Infrastructure index (TII), and human capital index( HCI) which are not reflecting the interaction between a government and their citizens. Based on data envelopment analyses (DEA) technique, we are using E-participating index (EPI) as an output of government effort to evaluate the performance of e-government system. Therefore, the ranking index can be achieved in efficiency manner.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1131697Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 866
 UNPAN 2008: Global E-government Survey: From E-government to connected Governance.
 Janssen, M., Hjort-Madsen, K.: Analyzing Enterprise Architecture in National Governments: The Cases of Denmark and the Netherlands. In: Sprague, R. (ed.) 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2007), IEEE, Big Island (2007)
 Alshawi, S., Alahmary, A., Alalwany, and H.: E-government Evaluation Factors: Citizen’s Perspective. Information Technology for Development e-Government Initiatives in theDeveloping World: Challenges and Opportunities 15(3), 193–208 (2009).
 Syamsuddin, I.: Evaluation of e-government initiatives in developing countries: an ITPOSMO approach. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences2(12),439–446 (2011)
 Kunstelj, M., Vintar, M.: Evaluating the progress of e-government development: Acritical analysis. Information Polity 9, 131–148 (2004)
 Gil-Garcia, J., & Pardo, T. (2005). E-Government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187–216.
 Hsieh, P.H., C.S., Yen, D.C., 2013. Assessing web services of emerging economies in an Eastern country-Taiwan’s e-government. Gov
 Jie Wu, Dong Guo. Measuring E-government performance of provincial government website in china with slacks-based efficiency measurement
 Shan, S., Wang, L., Wang, J., Hao, Y., & Hua, F. (2011). Research on e-government evaluation model based on the principal component analysis. Information Technology and Management, 12(2), 173–185.
 The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) report. Tunis November 2005.
 Layne, K, Lee, Jungwoo (2001), Developing Fully Functional E-government: A four-stage model, Government information quarterly 18(2): 122-136.
 UNE Centre of efficiency and productivity analysis (CEPA, University of New England.
 Sangkyu Rho, Jungnam An (2006), Evaluating the efficiency of a two-stage production process using data envelopment analysis. International transactions in operational research.
 Farelle M.J. and Fieldhouse M. (1962) Estimating efficient production functions under increasing returns to scale, J.R. Statis. Soc. Series A 125, 252-267.
 Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of DMUs, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, p. 429-444.
 Dyson, R.G., Allen, R., Camanho, A.S., Podinovski, V.V., Sarrico, C.S., Shale, E.A., 2001.Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 132 (2),245–259.
 Chen, Y., Liang, L., 2011. Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility: one model approach. European Journal of Operational Research 213 (1), 359–360.
 Kaoru Tone (1999) A slack-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, 2-2 Wakamatsu-cho, Shijuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8677, Japan
 Kaoru Tone (2001) A slack-based measure of supper-efficiency in data envelopment analysis. National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, 2-2 Wakamatsu-cho, Shijuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8677, Japan.