Latent Factors of Severity in Truck-Involved and Non-Truck-Involved Crashes on Freeways
Truck-involved crashes have higher crash severity than non-truck-involved crashes. There have been many studies about the frequency of crashes and the development of severity models, but those studies only analyzed the relationship between observed variables. To identify why more people are injured or killed when trucks are involved in the crash, we must examine to quantify the complex causal relationship between severity of the crash and risk factors by adopting the latent factors of crashes. The aim of this study was to develop a structural equation or model based on truck-involved and non-truck-involved crashes, including five latent variables, i.e. a crash factor, environmental factor, road factor, driver’s factor, and severity factor. To clarify the unique characteristics of truck-involved crashes compared to non-truck-involved crashes, a confirmatory analysis method was used. To develop the model, we extracted crash data from 10,083 crashes on Korean freeways from 2008 through 2014. The results showed that the most significant variable affecting the severity of a crash is the crash factor, which can be expressed by the location, cause, and type of the crash. For non-truck-involved crashes, the crash and environment factors increase severity of the crash; conversely, the road and driver factors tend to reduce severity of the crash. For truck-involved crashes, the driver factor has a significant effect on severity of the crash although its effect is slightly less than the crash factor. The multiple group analysis employed to analyze the differences between the heterogeneous groups of drivers.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1131423Procedia APA BibTeX Chicago EndNote Harvard JSON MLA RIS XML ISO 690 PDF Downloads 932
 Kim, K., P. Pant, and E. Yamashita. Measuring Influence of Accessibility on Accident Severity with Structural Equation Modeling. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2236, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, pp. 1-10.
 Hassan, H. M., and M. A. Abdel-Aty. Analysis of Drivers’ Behavior under Reduced Visibility Conditions Using a Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Transportation Research Part F: Psychology Behavior, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2011, pp. 614–625.
 Zhu, X., and S. Srinivasan. A Comprehensive Analysis of Factors Influencing the Injury Severity of Large-truck Accident. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No.1, 2011, pp. 49-57.
 Lee, J. Y., J. H. Chung, and B. Son. Analysis of Traffic Accident Size for Korean Highway Using Structural Equation Models. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No.6, 2008, pp. 1955–1963.
 U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics (2014), Transportation Statistics Annual Report (2013), available at http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/TSAR_2013.pdf, Accessed July 20, 2015.
 The Road Traffic Authority. Statistical Yearbook of Traffic Accident. 2015.
 Miaou, S. P. The Relationship between Truck Accidents and Geometric Design of Road Sections: Poisson versus Negative Binomial Regression. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 26, No.4, 1994, pp. 471-182.
 Charbotel, B., J. L. Martin, B. Gadegbeku, and M. Chiron, Severity Factors for Truck Drivers’ Injuries. American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol.158, No. 8, 2003, pp. 753-759.
 Häkkänen, H. and H. Summala. Fatal Traffic Accidents among Trailer Truck Drivers and Accident Caused as Viewed by Other Truck Drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 33, No.2, 2001, pp. 187-196.
 Park, S., K. Jang, S. H. Park, D.-K. Kim, and K. S. Chon. Analysis of Injury Severity in Traffic Crashes: A Case Study of Korean Expressways. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 7, 2012, pp. 1280-1288.
 Khattak, A. J. Risk Factors in Large Truck Rollovers and Injury Severity: Analysis of Single-vehicle Collisions. Presented at 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2003.
 Cantor, D. E., T. M. Corsi, C. M. Grimm, and K. Ozpolat. A Driver Focused Truck Crash Prediction Model. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 46, No. 5, 2010, pp. 683-692.
 Bunn, T. L., S. Slavova, T. W. Struttmann, and S. R. Browning. Sleepiness/fatigue and Distraction/inattention as Factors for Fatal versus Nonfatal Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Injuries. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 5, 2005, pp. 862-869.
 Xu, C., W. Wang, P. Liu, R. Guo, Z. Li, and F. Zhang. Real-time Freeway Crash Risk Assessment Using Structural Equation Modeling and Segmentation Analysis Approach, Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
 Chang, L. Y., and F. Mannering. Analysis of Injury Severity and Vehicle Occupancy in Truck- and Non-truck-involved Crashes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 31, No. 5, 1999, pp. 579-592.
 Khorashadi, A., D. Niemeier, V. Shankar, and F. Mannering. (2005), Differences in Rural and Urban Driver-injury Severities in Accidents Involving Large-trucks: an Exploratory Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No.5, 2005, pp. 910-921.
 Chen, F., and S. Chen. Injury Severities of Truck Drivers in Single-and Multi-vehicle Accidents on Rural Highways. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2011, pp. 1677-1688.
 Korean Statistical Information Service, Statistics Korea, Korea. http://kosis.kr/. Accesed July 20, 2015.
 Schumacker, R. E., and R. G. Lomax, A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd ed. Routledge, New York. 2010.
 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Highway Safety Manual, 1st edition. Washington, D.C., July 2010.
 Lomax, R. G. A Structural Model of Public and Private Schools. Jounal of Experimental Education, Vol. 53, No. 4, 1985, pp. 216-226.
 Arbuckle, J. L., and W. Wothke. Amos 5.0 user’s guide. Smallwaters Corporation, Chicago, Illinois, 2003.