The Way Digitized Lectures and Film Presence Coaching Impact Academic Identity: An Expert Facilitated Participatory Action Research Case Study

Authors: Amanda Burrell, Tonia Gary, David Wright, Kumara Ward

Abstract:

This paper explores the concept of academic identity as it relates to the lecture, in particular, the digitized lecture delivered to a camera, in the absence of a student audience. Many academics have the performance aspect of the role thrust upon them with little or no training. For the purpose of this study, we look at the performance of the academic identity and examine tailored film presence coaching for its contributions toward academic identity, specifically in relation to feelings of self-confidence and diminishment of discomfort or stage fright. The case is articulated through the lens of scholar-practitioners, using expert facilitated participatory action research. It demonstrates in our sample of experienced academics, all reported some feelings of uncertainty about presenting lectures to camera prior to coaching. We share how power poses and reframing fear, produced improvements in the ease and competency of all participants. We share exactly how this insight could be adapted for self-coaching by any academic when called to present to a camera and consider the relationship between this and academic identity.

Keywords: Academic identity, embodied learning, digitized lecture, performance coaching.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1131113

References:

[1] Avgitidou, S., (2009). Participation, roles and processes in a collaborative action research project: a reflexive account of the facilitator, Educational Action Research, 17:4,585-600, DOI: 10.1080/09650790903309441
[2] Bevins, S. C., and G. Price. 2014. “Collaboration between Academics and Teachers: A Complex Relationship.” Educational Action Research 22 (2): 270–284.
[3] Billot, S., (2010) The imagined and the real: identifying the tensions for academic identity, Higher Education Research & Development, 29:6, 709-721, DOI:10.1080/07294360.2010.487201
[4] Blenkin, G., & Hutchin, V. (1998). Action research, child observations and professional development: some evidence from a research project. Early years, 19(1), 62-75.
[5] Briggs, A.R.J. (2007). Exploring professional identities: Middle leadership in further education colleges. School Leadership and Management, 27(5), 471–485.
[6] Brooks, A. W., (2014). Get excited: Reappraising pre-performance anxiety as excitement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1144
[7] Burrell,A.,(2016). Centre for Educational Research, Western Sydney University, https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/cer/postgraduate_study/ doctoral_researchers/amandaburrell., accessed on 22/02/2017
[8] Butterwick, S., & Selman, J. (2012). Embodied knowledge and decolonization: Walking with theater's powerful and risky pedagogy. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2012(134), 61-69.
[9] Callery, D. (2015). Through the body: a practical guide to physical theatre. Routledge.
[10] Churchman, D. (2006). Institutional commitments, individual compromises: Identity-related responses to compromise in an Australian university. Journal of Higher Education, 28(1), 3–15.
[11] Clifford, J., (1997). Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, United States of America
[12] Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary education and management, 11, 19-36, Springer
[13] Cuddy, A. (2016). Presence, Bringing your Boldest Self to your Biggest Challenges, Orion Publishing Group, London.
[14] Crannell, K, C., (2000). Voice and Articulation 4th Ed, Wadsworth Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA
[15] Day, C.W., and M. Hadfield. 2005. Harnessing action research: The power of network learning. In Network learning for educational change, ed. W. Veugelers and M.J. O’ Hair, 52–71. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
[16] Eraut, M. 1994. Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: The Falmer Press.
[17] Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 9(3), 558-565.
[18] Hall, S., (1989). Cultural Identity and Cinematic Representation. in Framework 36: 68-81
[19] Hall, S., (1990). Cultural Identity and Diaspora in J. Rutherford (ed.) Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. London: Lawrence and Wishart
[20] Harvey, W. S., (2011). Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research 11: 431–441.
[21] Humes, W. 2014. “The Possibilities and Limitations of Practitioner Enquiry.” Education Today 64 (4): 3–7.
[22] James, W., (1984). What is an emotion? Mind, 9, 188-205
[23] Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart, eds. 1988. The action research planner. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
[24] Kennedy, G., Krause, K. L., Gray, K., Judd, T., Bennett, S. J., K. A., ... & Bishop, A. (2006). Questioning the net generation: A collaborative project in Australian higher education. Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 413-417). Sydney University Press, Australia.
[25] Lazarus, R.S., (1993). Coping theory and research: past, present and future. Psychosomatic Medicine 55, 234-247
[26] Lightfoot, S., and D. Frost. 2015. “The Professional Identity of Early Years Educators in England: Implications for a Transformative Approach to Continuing Professional Development.” Professional Development in Education 41 (2): 401–418.
[27] Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by embodiment: Six precepts for research on embodied learning and mixed reality. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445-452.
[28] Lofthouse,. R., Flanagan. J., & Wigley. B., (2015): A new model of collaborative action research; theorising from inter-professional practice development, Educational Action Research, DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2015.1110038
[29] Meichenbaum, D., & Cameron, R. (1989). Stress inoculation training. In Stress reduction and prevention (pp. 115-154). Springer US.
[30] Nguyen, D. J., & Larson, J. B. (2015). Don’t forget about the body: Exploring the curricular possibilities of embodied pedagogy. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 331-344.
[31] Noffke, S. E and Somekh, B., (2009). The SAGE Handbook Educational Action Research, Sage, London
[32] Schon,D., (1983). Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books
[33] Schon,D., (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
[34] Shannon, D., P. Snyder, and T. McLaughlin. 2015. “Preschool Teachers’ Insights about Web-Based Self- Coaching versus on-Site Expert Coaching.” Professional Development in Education 41 (2): 290–309.
[35] Smeets, K., & Ponte, P. (2009). Action research and teacher leadership. Professional development in education, 35(2), 175-193.
[36] Winter, R. (2009). Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(22), 121–131.
[37] Winter, R., Taylor, T., & Sarros, J., (2000). Trouble at mill: Quality of academic worklife issues within a comprehensive Australian university. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 279-294
[38] Winters, A. F. (2008). Emotion, embodiment, and mirror neurons in dance/movement therapy: A connection across disciplines. American Journal of Dance/Movement Therapy, 30, 84–105.